为新诊断前列腺癌患者的泌尿生殖功能定制语言,以促进不同人群的讨论并克服健康知识障碍

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancer Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1002/cncr.35498
Kerry L. Kilbridge MD, MSc, Dattatraya Patil MBBS, MPH, Christopher Paul Filson MD, MS, Joseph W. Shelton MD, Sierra Williams Thomson BS, Cecilia H. Rosenbaum MD, Emily C. Rothmann BA, William Martin-Doyle MD, Quoc-Dien Trinh MD, MBA, Vikram M. Narayan MD, Viraj A. Master MD, PhD
{"title":"为新诊断前列腺癌患者的泌尿生殖功能定制语言,以促进不同人群的讨论并克服健康知识障碍","authors":"Kerry L. Kilbridge MD, MSc,&nbsp;Dattatraya Patil MBBS, MPH,&nbsp;Christopher Paul Filson MD, MS,&nbsp;Joseph W. Shelton MD,&nbsp;Sierra Williams Thomson BS,&nbsp;Cecilia H. Rosenbaum MD,&nbsp;Emily C. Rothmann BA,&nbsp;William Martin-Doyle MD,&nbsp;Quoc-Dien Trinh MD, MBA,&nbsp;Vikram M. Narayan MD,&nbsp;Viraj A. Master MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Poor comprehension of prostate cancer (PCa) medical terms can create barriers to PCa treatment discussions. The authors measured comprehension of PCa terms and its relationship to health literacy in a group of Black men who were newly diagnosed with PCa. They examined whether tailoring communication with alternative colloquial words would be helpful and acceptable.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients were recruited from urology clinics (<i>N</i> = 152). After they met with their providers to discuss PCa treatment options, they participated in an educational supplement delivered as a structured interview. The supplement tailored PCa treatment information by allowing men to choose between colloquial and medical terms for genitourinary (GU) function. Health literacy was measured using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine, and comprehension of common PCa terms was assessed using published methods. Pearson correlation was used to estimate the association between health literacy and comprehension of PCa terms. Spearman rank correlation (<i>r</i>) was used to assess the relation between the total number of medical terms preferred (range, 0–10) and Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine scores (range, 0–66).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Most patients (62%) had low health literacy, which was strongly correlated with their understanding of PCa terms (<i>r</i> = 0.526; <i>p</i> &lt; .001). Poor comprehension of many PCa terms established the need to use alternative language for GU function (only 20% knew the word <i>incontinence</i>). There was a statistically significant positive association between the number of medical terms preferred and health literacy (<i>r</i> = 0.358; <i>p</i> &lt; .001). A majority of patients (91%) preferred a mixture of medical and colloquial terms.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Tailoring communications with colloquial terms for GU function was preferred by most patients regardless of health literacy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"130 S20","pages":"3602-3611"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cncr.35498","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tailoring language for genitourinary function in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer to facilitate discussions in diverse populations and overcome health literacy barriers\",\"authors\":\"Kerry L. Kilbridge MD, MSc,&nbsp;Dattatraya Patil MBBS, MPH,&nbsp;Christopher Paul Filson MD, MS,&nbsp;Joseph W. Shelton MD,&nbsp;Sierra Williams Thomson BS,&nbsp;Cecilia H. Rosenbaum MD,&nbsp;Emily C. Rothmann BA,&nbsp;William Martin-Doyle MD,&nbsp;Quoc-Dien Trinh MD, MBA,&nbsp;Vikram M. Narayan MD,&nbsp;Viraj A. Master MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cncr.35498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Poor comprehension of prostate cancer (PCa) medical terms can create barriers to PCa treatment discussions. The authors measured comprehension of PCa terms and its relationship to health literacy in a group of Black men who were newly diagnosed with PCa. They examined whether tailoring communication with alternative colloquial words would be helpful and acceptable.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients were recruited from urology clinics (<i>N</i> = 152). After they met with their providers to discuss PCa treatment options, they participated in an educational supplement delivered as a structured interview. The supplement tailored PCa treatment information by allowing men to choose between colloquial and medical terms for genitourinary (GU) function. Health literacy was measured using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine, and comprehension of common PCa terms was assessed using published methods. Pearson correlation was used to estimate the association between health literacy and comprehension of PCa terms. Spearman rank correlation (<i>r</i>) was used to assess the relation between the total number of medical terms preferred (range, 0–10) and Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine scores (range, 0–66).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Most patients (62%) had low health literacy, which was strongly correlated with their understanding of PCa terms (<i>r</i> = 0.526; <i>p</i> &lt; .001). Poor comprehension of many PCa terms established the need to use alternative language for GU function (only 20% knew the word <i>incontinence</i>). There was a statistically significant positive association between the number of medical terms preferred and health literacy (<i>r</i> = 0.358; <i>p</i> &lt; .001). A majority of patients (91%) preferred a mixture of medical and colloquial terms.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Tailoring communications with colloquial terms for GU function was preferred by most patients regardless of health literacy.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer\",\"volume\":\"130 S20\",\"pages\":\"3602-3611\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cncr.35498\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35498\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35498","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景对前列腺癌(PCa)医学术语的理解能力较差会对讨论 PCa 治疗造成障碍。作者测量了一组新诊断出患有 PCa 的黑人男性对 PCa 术语的理解能力及其与健康素养的关系。他们研究了使用替代性口语词汇进行有针对性的交流是否会有所帮助并为人们所接受。他们与医生会面讨论 PCa 治疗方案后,参加了以结构化访谈形式提供的教育补充材料。该补充材料允许男性在泌尿生殖系统(GU)功能的口语和医学术语之间进行选择,从而为他们量身定制了 PCa 治疗信息。健康素养采用成人医学素养快速评估法进行测量,常见 PCa 术语的理解能力采用已公布的方法进行评估。Pearson相关性用于估算健康素养与PCa术语理解力之间的关系。结果大多数患者(62%)的健康素养较低,这与他们对 PCa 术语的理解能力密切相关(r = 0.526; p <.001)。由于对许多 PCa 术语的理解能力较差,因此有必要使用其他语言来描述 GU 功能(只有 20% 的患者知道大小便失禁一词)。在统计学上,首选医学术语的数量与健康素养之间存在明显的正相关(r = 0.358; p <.001)。大多数患者(91%)倾向于混合使用医学术语和口语化术语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tailoring language for genitourinary function in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer to facilitate discussions in diverse populations and overcome health literacy barriers

Background

Poor comprehension of prostate cancer (PCa) medical terms can create barriers to PCa treatment discussions. The authors measured comprehension of PCa terms and its relationship to health literacy in a group of Black men who were newly diagnosed with PCa. They examined whether tailoring communication with alternative colloquial words would be helpful and acceptable.

Methods

Patients were recruited from urology clinics (N = 152). After they met with their providers to discuss PCa treatment options, they participated in an educational supplement delivered as a structured interview. The supplement tailored PCa treatment information by allowing men to choose between colloquial and medical terms for genitourinary (GU) function. Health literacy was measured using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine, and comprehension of common PCa terms was assessed using published methods. Pearson correlation was used to estimate the association between health literacy and comprehension of PCa terms. Spearman rank correlation (r) was used to assess the relation between the total number of medical terms preferred (range, 0–10) and Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine scores (range, 0–66).

Results

Most patients (62%) had low health literacy, which was strongly correlated with their understanding of PCa terms (r = 0.526; p < .001). Poor comprehension of many PCa terms established the need to use alternative language for GU function (only 20% knew the word incontinence). There was a statistically significant positive association between the number of medical terms preferred and health literacy (r = 0.358; p < .001). A majority of patients (91%) preferred a mixture of medical and colloquial terms.

Conclusions

Tailoring communications with colloquial terms for GU function was preferred by most patients regardless of health literacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer
Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
480
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society. CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research
期刊最新文献
Disparities in cancer incidence by sexual orientation. Considering screening for hereditary cancer syndromes at the time of obstetrical prenatal carrier screening. Clinical outcomes of ruxolitinib treatment in 595 intermediate-1 risk patients with myelofibrosis: The RUX-MF Real-World Study. Changes in Merkel cell oncoprotein antibodies after radiation therapy in curatively treated Merkel cell carcinoma and association with recurrence. Association between racial residential segregation and screening uptake for colorectal and cervical cancer among Black and White patients in five US health care systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1