税收减免与家庭行为:模拟经济中近视决策和流动性的作用

Jialin Dong, Kshama Dwarakanath, Svitlana Vyetrenko
{"title":"税收减免与家庭行为:模拟经济中近视决策和流动性的作用","authors":"Jialin Dong, Kshama Dwarakanath, Svitlana Vyetrenko","doi":"arxiv-2408.10391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been a growing interest in multi-agent simulators in the domain of\neconomic modeling. However, contemporary research often involves developing\nreinforcement learning (RL) based models that focus solely on a single type of\nagents, such as households, firms, or the government. Such an approach\noverlooks the adaptation of interacting agents thereby failing to capture the\ncomplexity of real-world economic systems. In this work, we consider a\nmulti-agent simulator comprised of RL agents of numerous types, including\nheterogeneous households, firm, central bank and government. In particular, we\nfocus on the crucial role of the government in distributing tax credits to\nhouseholds. We conduct two broad categories of comprehensive experiments\ndealing with the impact of tax credits on 1) households with varied degrees of\nmyopia (short-sightedness in spending and saving decisions), and 2) households\nwith diverse liquidity profiles. The first category of experiments examines the\nimpact of the frequency of tax credits (e.g. annual vs quarterly) on\nconsumption patterns of myopic households. The second category of experiments\nfocuses on the impact of varying tax credit distribution strategies on\nhouseholds with differing liquidities. We validate our simulation model by\nreproducing trends observed in real households upon receipt of unforeseen,\nuniform tax credits, as documented in a JPMorgan Chase report. Based on the\nresults of the latter, we propose an innovative tax credit distribution\nstrategy for the government to reduce inequality among households. We\ndemonstrate the efficacy of this strategy in improving social welfare in our\nsimulation results.","PeriodicalId":501273,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - General Economics","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tax Credits and Household Behavior: The Roles of Myopic Decision-Making and Liquidity in a Simulated Economy\",\"authors\":\"Jialin Dong, Kshama Dwarakanath, Svitlana Vyetrenko\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.10391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There has been a growing interest in multi-agent simulators in the domain of\\neconomic modeling. However, contemporary research often involves developing\\nreinforcement learning (RL) based models that focus solely on a single type of\\nagents, such as households, firms, or the government. Such an approach\\noverlooks the adaptation of interacting agents thereby failing to capture the\\ncomplexity of real-world economic systems. In this work, we consider a\\nmulti-agent simulator comprised of RL agents of numerous types, including\\nheterogeneous households, firm, central bank and government. In particular, we\\nfocus on the crucial role of the government in distributing tax credits to\\nhouseholds. We conduct two broad categories of comprehensive experiments\\ndealing with the impact of tax credits on 1) households with varied degrees of\\nmyopia (short-sightedness in spending and saving decisions), and 2) households\\nwith diverse liquidity profiles. The first category of experiments examines the\\nimpact of the frequency of tax credits (e.g. annual vs quarterly) on\\nconsumption patterns of myopic households. The second category of experiments\\nfocuses on the impact of varying tax credit distribution strategies on\\nhouseholds with differing liquidities. We validate our simulation model by\\nreproducing trends observed in real households upon receipt of unforeseen,\\nuniform tax credits, as documented in a JPMorgan Chase report. Based on the\\nresults of the latter, we propose an innovative tax credit distribution\\nstrategy for the government to reduce inequality among households. We\\ndemonstrate the efficacy of this strategy in improving social welfare in our\\nsimulation results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - General Economics\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - General Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.10391\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - General Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.10391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在经济建模领域,人们对多代理模拟器的兴趣与日俱增。然而,当代的研究往往涉及开发基于强化学习(RL)的模型,这些模型只关注单一类型的代理,如家庭、企业或政府。这种方法忽视了互动代理的适应性,因而无法捕捉现实世界经济系统的复杂性。在这项工作中,我们考虑了由多种类型的 RL 代理组成的多代理模拟器,包括异质家庭、企业、中央银行和政府。我们尤其关注政府在向家庭分配税收抵免方面的关键作用。我们进行了两大类综合实验,研究税收抵免对以下两类家庭的影响:1)具有不同程度近视(在支出和储蓄决策中的短视)的家庭;2)具有不同流动性特征的家庭。第一类实验研究税收抵免的频率(如年度与季度)对近视家庭消费模式的影响。第二类实验侧重于不同税收抵免分配策略对不同流动性家庭的影响。我们通过再现摩根大通报告中记录的实际家庭在收到不可预见的统一税收抵免时的趋势来验证我们的模拟模型。基于后者的结果,我们为政府提出了一种创新的税收抵免分配策略,以减少家庭间的不平等。我们在模拟结果中证明了这一策略在改善社会福利方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tax Credits and Household Behavior: The Roles of Myopic Decision-Making and Liquidity in a Simulated Economy
There has been a growing interest in multi-agent simulators in the domain of economic modeling. However, contemporary research often involves developing reinforcement learning (RL) based models that focus solely on a single type of agents, such as households, firms, or the government. Such an approach overlooks the adaptation of interacting agents thereby failing to capture the complexity of real-world economic systems. In this work, we consider a multi-agent simulator comprised of RL agents of numerous types, including heterogeneous households, firm, central bank and government. In particular, we focus on the crucial role of the government in distributing tax credits to households. We conduct two broad categories of comprehensive experiments dealing with the impact of tax credits on 1) households with varied degrees of myopia (short-sightedness in spending and saving decisions), and 2) households with diverse liquidity profiles. The first category of experiments examines the impact of the frequency of tax credits (e.g. annual vs quarterly) on consumption patterns of myopic households. The second category of experiments focuses on the impact of varying tax credit distribution strategies on households with differing liquidities. We validate our simulation model by reproducing trends observed in real households upon receipt of unforeseen, uniform tax credits, as documented in a JPMorgan Chase report. Based on the results of the latter, we propose an innovative tax credit distribution strategy for the government to reduce inequality among households. We demonstrate the efficacy of this strategy in improving social welfare in our simulation results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
It depends: Varieties of defining growth dependence Experimental Evidence That Conversational Artificial Intelligence Can Steer Consumer Behavior Without Detection Cognitive Hierarchy in Day-to-day Network Flow Dynamics The long-term human capital and health impacts of a pollution reduction programme What Does ChatGPT Make of Historical Stock Returns? Extrapolation and Miscalibration in LLM Stock Return Forecasts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1