A. David Redish, Henri Scott Chastain, Carlisle Ford Runge, Brian M. Sweis, Scott E. Allen, Antara Haldar
{"title":"新神经经济框架的政策后果","authors":"A. David Redish, Henri Scott Chastain, Carlisle Ford Runge, Brian M. Sweis, Scott E. Allen, Antara Haldar","doi":"arxiv-2409.07373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current theories of decision making suggest that the neural circuits in\nmammalian brains (including humans) computationally combine representations of\nthe past (memory), present (perception), and future (agentic goals) to take\nactions that achieve the needs of the agent. How information is represented\nwithin those neural circuits changes what computations are available to that\nsystem which changes how agents interact with their world to take those\nactions. We argue that the computational neuroscience of decision making\nprovides a new microeconomic framework (neuroeconomics) that offers new\nopportunities to construct policies that interact with those decision-making\nsystems to improve outcomes. After laying out the computational processes\nunderlying decision making in mammalian brains, we present four applications of\nthis logic with policy consequences: (1) contingency management as a treatment\nfor addiction, (2) precommitment and the sensitivity to sunk costs, (3) media\nconsequences for changes in housing prices after a disaster, and (4) how social\ninteractions underlie the success (and failure) of microfinance institutions.","PeriodicalId":501273,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - General Economics","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policy consequences of the new neuroeconomic framework\",\"authors\":\"A. David Redish, Henri Scott Chastain, Carlisle Ford Runge, Brian M. Sweis, Scott E. Allen, Antara Haldar\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.07373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Current theories of decision making suggest that the neural circuits in\\nmammalian brains (including humans) computationally combine representations of\\nthe past (memory), present (perception), and future (agentic goals) to take\\nactions that achieve the needs of the agent. How information is represented\\nwithin those neural circuits changes what computations are available to that\\nsystem which changes how agents interact with their world to take those\\nactions. We argue that the computational neuroscience of decision making\\nprovides a new microeconomic framework (neuroeconomics) that offers new\\nopportunities to construct policies that interact with those decision-making\\nsystems to improve outcomes. After laying out the computational processes\\nunderlying decision making in mammalian brains, we present four applications of\\nthis logic with policy consequences: (1) contingency management as a treatment\\nfor addiction, (2) precommitment and the sensitivity to sunk costs, (3) media\\nconsequences for changes in housing prices after a disaster, and (4) how social\\ninteractions underlie the success (and failure) of microfinance institutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - General Economics\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - General Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07373\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - General Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Policy consequences of the new neuroeconomic framework
Current theories of decision making suggest that the neural circuits in
mammalian brains (including humans) computationally combine representations of
the past (memory), present (perception), and future (agentic goals) to take
actions that achieve the needs of the agent. How information is represented
within those neural circuits changes what computations are available to that
system which changes how agents interact with their world to take those
actions. We argue that the computational neuroscience of decision making
provides a new microeconomic framework (neuroeconomics) that offers new
opportunities to construct policies that interact with those decision-making
systems to improve outcomes. After laying out the computational processes
underlying decision making in mammalian brains, we present four applications of
this logic with policy consequences: (1) contingency management as a treatment
for addiction, (2) precommitment and the sensitivity to sunk costs, (3) media
consequences for changes in housing prices after a disaster, and (4) how social
interactions underlie the success (and failure) of microfinance institutions.