熔盐法和浸渍法生产污水污泥活性炭的生命周期比较评估

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1007/s10163-024-02052-z
En Shi, Shuai Zhang, Miao Zhang, Shasha Liu, Yuliang Zou, Xiangzhi Zhang
{"title":"熔盐法和浸渍法生产污水污泥活性炭的生命周期比较评估","authors":"En Shi,&nbsp;Shuai Zhang,&nbsp;Miao Zhang,&nbsp;Shasha Liu,&nbsp;Yuliang Zou,&nbsp;Xiangzhi Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10163-024-02052-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The implementation of life-cycle assessment (LCA) was to quantify the potential environmental impact of activated carbon production from sewage sludge by the molten salt and impregnation methods. Based on the experiments of the molten salt and impregnation methods, a flowchart was developed and the environmental impact was determined. The results showed that the environmental impacts dominated by roasting, followed by grinding or impregnating and finally by washing and drying. The uses of electricity and ZnCl<sub>2</sub> in the production of activated carbon were the main factors causing environmental impact. The energy consumptions of the molten salt and impregnation methods were 56.16 and 73.44 MJ/kg activated carbon, respectively. The global warming potential of the molten salt and impregnation methods was found to be 14.68 and 17.15 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq/kg activated carbon, respectively. The impregnation method had higher energy consumption and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions than those for the molten salt method. The LCA showed that the molten salt method offered environmental advantages in most impact categories in comparison with the impregnation method.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":"26 6","pages":"3460 - 3469"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10163-024-02052-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative life-cycle assessment of molten salt and impregnation methods for producing activated carbon from sewage sludge\",\"authors\":\"En Shi,&nbsp;Shuai Zhang,&nbsp;Miao Zhang,&nbsp;Shasha Liu,&nbsp;Yuliang Zou,&nbsp;Xiangzhi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10163-024-02052-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The implementation of life-cycle assessment (LCA) was to quantify the potential environmental impact of activated carbon production from sewage sludge by the molten salt and impregnation methods. Based on the experiments of the molten salt and impregnation methods, a flowchart was developed and the environmental impact was determined. The results showed that the environmental impacts dominated by roasting, followed by grinding or impregnating and finally by washing and drying. The uses of electricity and ZnCl<sub>2</sub> in the production of activated carbon were the main factors causing environmental impact. The energy consumptions of the molten salt and impregnation methods were 56.16 and 73.44 MJ/kg activated carbon, respectively. The global warming potential of the molten salt and impregnation methods was found to be 14.68 and 17.15 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq/kg activated carbon, respectively. The impregnation method had higher energy consumption and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions than those for the molten salt method. The LCA showed that the molten salt method offered environmental advantages in most impact categories in comparison with the impregnation method.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management\",\"volume\":\"26 6\",\"pages\":\"3460 - 3469\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10163-024-02052-z.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-024-02052-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-024-02052-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实施生命周期评估(LCA)的目的是量化熔盐法和浸渍法利用污水污泥生产活性炭对环境的潜在影响。在熔盐法和浸渍法实验的基础上,绘制了流程图并确定了对环境的影响。结果表明,对环境影响最大的是焙烧,其次是研磨或浸渍,最后是洗涤和干燥。活性炭生产过程中使用的电力和氯化锌是造成环境影响的主要因素。熔盐法和浸渍法的能耗分别为 56.16 兆焦耳/千克活性炭和 73.44 兆焦耳/千克活性炭。熔盐法和浸渍法的全球升温潜能值分别为 14.68 千克二氧化碳当量/千克活性炭和 17.15 千克二氧化碳当量/千克活性炭。浸渍法的能耗和二氧化碳排放量高于熔盐法。生命周期评估表明,与浸渍法相比,熔盐法在大多数影响类别中都具有环境优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative life-cycle assessment of molten salt and impregnation methods for producing activated carbon from sewage sludge

The implementation of life-cycle assessment (LCA) was to quantify the potential environmental impact of activated carbon production from sewage sludge by the molten salt and impregnation methods. Based on the experiments of the molten salt and impregnation methods, a flowchart was developed and the environmental impact was determined. The results showed that the environmental impacts dominated by roasting, followed by grinding or impregnating and finally by washing and drying. The uses of electricity and ZnCl2 in the production of activated carbon were the main factors causing environmental impact. The energy consumptions of the molten salt and impregnation methods were 56.16 and 73.44 MJ/kg activated carbon, respectively. The global warming potential of the molten salt and impregnation methods was found to be 14.68 and 17.15 kg CO2 eq/kg activated carbon, respectively. The impregnation method had higher energy consumption and CO2 emissions than those for the molten salt method. The LCA showed that the molten salt method offered environmental advantages in most impact categories in comparison with the impregnation method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
16.10%
发文量
205
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management has a twofold focus: research in technical, political, and environmental problems of material cycles and waste management; and information that contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary science of material cycles and waste management. Its aim is to develop solutions and prescriptions for material cycles. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, and invited papers from a wide range of disciplines related to material cycles and waste management. The journal is published in cooperation with the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management (JSMCWM) and the Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM).
期刊最新文献
Recovery of samarium and cobalt/iron oxide from SmCo magnets through acid baking and water leaching Lactic acid-fermented by-product of Shochu distillery reduces anxiety behavior in Neuropeptide Y knockout zebrafish by the regulation of isotoin neuron Circular economy in fashion: consumer awareness and lifestyle, and environmental impact on second-hand clothes Simulating the trajectory of conductive particles in positive high-voltage electrostatic separators and optimizing parameters Sustainable solution selection for solid waste incineration fly ash: a multicriteria framework based on objective weights and fusion ranks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1