循环和动态荷载下非平面钢筋混凝土墙体整体和局部行为模拟的修正压缩场理论和扰动应力场模型

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1007/s10518-024-01982-1
Ryan D.Hoult, João Pacheco de Almeida
{"title":"循环和动态荷载下非平面钢筋混凝土墙体整体和局部行为模拟的修正压缩场理论和扰动应力场模型","authors":"Ryan D.Hoult, João Pacheco de Almeida","doi":"10.1007/s10518-024-01982-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Modified Compression Field Theory (MCFT) offers an improved understanding of concrete behaviour by considering it as an orthotropic material and incorporating comprehensive rotating, smeared crack models. Despite its widespread applicability and reliability, shortcomings have been identified, particularly in scenarios involving substantial reinforcement, high biaxial compressive loads, and minimal transverse reinforcement. The introduction of the Disturbed Stress Field Model (DSFM), an extension of MCFT, addresses some of these limitations by incorporating discrete slip on crack surfaces, thus refining the alignment between principal stress and strain fields. This paper explores the implementation and suitability of MCFT and DSFM within the VecTor suite of finite element software for simulating the response of non-planar RC U-shaped core walls in quasi-static and dynamic tests. Blind prediction and postdiction analyses underscore the significance of modelling assumptions and emphasize the necessity of certain modelling approaches. Reducing the fourth mode Rayleigh damping from 10 to 2% significantly improved the simulated pre-yield displacement time-histories. Introducing strain penetration effects into the model enhanced local behaviour. For GM5, the maximum measured tensile base strain was 5.7%, compared to the simulated 5.3%. Peak displacements for the largest unidirectional ground motion were significantly underestimated at -79 mm compared to the measured -116 mm. Factors like base shear sliding likely contributed to the peak displacements, which the current model could not simulate. The study underscores the importance of MCFT/DSFM in accurately capturing structural behaviour and offers insights for future modelling endeavours in complex RC structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modified compression field theory and disturbed stress field model on the simulation of the global and local behaviour of non-planar reinforced concrete walls under cyclic and dynamic loading\",\"authors\":\"Ryan D.Hoult, João Pacheco de Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10518-024-01982-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Modified Compression Field Theory (MCFT) offers an improved understanding of concrete behaviour by considering it as an orthotropic material and incorporating comprehensive rotating, smeared crack models. Despite its widespread applicability and reliability, shortcomings have been identified, particularly in scenarios involving substantial reinforcement, high biaxial compressive loads, and minimal transverse reinforcement. The introduction of the Disturbed Stress Field Model (DSFM), an extension of MCFT, addresses some of these limitations by incorporating discrete slip on crack surfaces, thus refining the alignment between principal stress and strain fields. This paper explores the implementation and suitability of MCFT and DSFM within the VecTor suite of finite element software for simulating the response of non-planar RC U-shaped core walls in quasi-static and dynamic tests. Blind prediction and postdiction analyses underscore the significance of modelling assumptions and emphasize the necessity of certain modelling approaches. Reducing the fourth mode Rayleigh damping from 10 to 2% significantly improved the simulated pre-yield displacement time-histories. Introducing strain penetration effects into the model enhanced local behaviour. For GM5, the maximum measured tensile base strain was 5.7%, compared to the simulated 5.3%. Peak displacements for the largest unidirectional ground motion were significantly underestimated at -79 mm compared to the measured -116 mm. Factors like base shear sliding likely contributed to the peak displacements, which the current model could not simulate. The study underscores the importance of MCFT/DSFM in accurately capturing structural behaviour and offers insights for future modelling endeavours in complex RC structures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-024-01982-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-024-01982-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

修正压缩场理论(MCFT)将混凝土视为各向同性材料,并结合了全面的旋转、模糊裂缝模型,从而提高了对混凝土行为的理解。尽管该理论具有广泛的适用性和可靠性,但仍存在不足之处,特别是在涉及大量钢筋、高双向压缩荷载和最小横向钢筋的情况下。扰动应力场模型(DSFM)是 MCFT 的扩展,通过在裂缝表面加入离散滑移,从而完善主应力和应变场之间的配准,解决了其中的一些局限性。本文探讨了 MCFT 和 DSFM 在 VecTor 套装有限元软件中的实施和适用性,以模拟非平面 RC U 型芯墙在准静态和动态测试中的响应。盲预测和后预测分析强调了建模假设的重要性,并强调了某些建模方法的必要性。将第四模态瑞利阻尼从 10% 降低到 2%,可显著改善模拟的预屈服位移时间序列。在模型中引入应变渗透效应增强了局部行为。对于 GM5,测得的最大拉伸基底应变为 5.7%,而模拟应变为 5.3%。最大单向地动的峰值位移被严重低估,为-79 毫米,而实测值为-116 毫米。基底剪切滑动等因素可能导致了峰值位移,而目前的模型无法模拟这些因素。这项研究强调了 MCFT/DSFM 在准确捕捉结构行为方面的重要性,并为未来复杂 RC 结构的建模工作提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modified compression field theory and disturbed stress field model on the simulation of the global and local behaviour of non-planar reinforced concrete walls under cyclic and dynamic loading

The Modified Compression Field Theory (MCFT) offers an improved understanding of concrete behaviour by considering it as an orthotropic material and incorporating comprehensive rotating, smeared crack models. Despite its widespread applicability and reliability, shortcomings have been identified, particularly in scenarios involving substantial reinforcement, high biaxial compressive loads, and minimal transverse reinforcement. The introduction of the Disturbed Stress Field Model (DSFM), an extension of MCFT, addresses some of these limitations by incorporating discrete slip on crack surfaces, thus refining the alignment between principal stress and strain fields. This paper explores the implementation and suitability of MCFT and DSFM within the VecTor suite of finite element software for simulating the response of non-planar RC U-shaped core walls in quasi-static and dynamic tests. Blind prediction and postdiction analyses underscore the significance of modelling assumptions and emphasize the necessity of certain modelling approaches. Reducing the fourth mode Rayleigh damping from 10 to 2% significantly improved the simulated pre-yield displacement time-histories. Introducing strain penetration effects into the model enhanced local behaviour. For GM5, the maximum measured tensile base strain was 5.7%, compared to the simulated 5.3%. Peak displacements for the largest unidirectional ground motion were significantly underestimated at -79 mm compared to the measured -116 mm. Factors like base shear sliding likely contributed to the peak displacements, which the current model could not simulate. The study underscores the importance of MCFT/DSFM in accurately capturing structural behaviour and offers insights for future modelling endeavours in complex RC structures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
期刊最新文献
Does seismic isolation reduce the seismic vulnerability and the variability of the inelastic seismic response? Large-scale experimental investigation Advanced nonlinear soil-structure interaction model for the seismic analysis of safety-related nuclear structures Experimental investigation on the seismic performance of reinforced concrete frames with decoupled masonry infills: considering in-plane and out-of-plane load interaction effects Seismicity in Central America (1520–2020) and Earthquake catalog compilation for seismic hazard assessments Extended Bouc-Wen model identification using shaking table test data of ageing RC bridge piers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1