了解地基模型:我们是否回到了 1924 年?

Alan F. Smeaton
{"title":"了解地基模型:我们是否回到了 1924 年?","authors":"Alan F. Smeaton","doi":"arxiv-2409.07618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This position paper explores the rapid development of Foundation Models (FMs)\nin AI and their implications for intelligence and reasoning. It examines the\ncharacteristics of FMs, including their training on vast datasets and use of\nembedding spaces to capture semantic relationships. The paper discusses recent\nadvancements in FMs' reasoning abilities which we argue cannot be attributed to\nincreased model size but to novel training techniques which yield learning\nphenomena like grokking. It also addresses the challenges in benchmarking FMs\nand compares their structure to the human brain. We argue that while FMs show\npromising developments in reasoning and knowledge representation, understanding\ntheir inner workings remains a significant challenge, similar to ongoing\nefforts in neuroscience to comprehend human brain function. Despite having some\nsimilarities, fundamental differences between FMs and the structure of human\nbrain warn us against making direct comparisons or expecting neuroscience to\nprovide immediate insights into FM function.","PeriodicalId":501479,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Artificial Intelligence","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Foundation Models: Are We Back in 1924?\",\"authors\":\"Alan F. Smeaton\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.07618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This position paper explores the rapid development of Foundation Models (FMs)\\nin AI and their implications for intelligence and reasoning. It examines the\\ncharacteristics of FMs, including their training on vast datasets and use of\\nembedding spaces to capture semantic relationships. The paper discusses recent\\nadvancements in FMs' reasoning abilities which we argue cannot be attributed to\\nincreased model size but to novel training techniques which yield learning\\nphenomena like grokking. It also addresses the challenges in benchmarking FMs\\nand compares their structure to the human brain. We argue that while FMs show\\npromising developments in reasoning and knowledge representation, understanding\\ntheir inner workings remains a significant challenge, similar to ongoing\\nefforts in neuroscience to comprehend human brain function. Despite having some\\nsimilarities, fundamental differences between FMs and the structure of human\\nbrain warn us against making direct comparisons or expecting neuroscience to\\nprovide immediate insights into FM function.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07618\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本立场文件探讨了人工智能中基础模型(FMs)的快速发展及其对智能和推理的影响。它探讨了基础模型的特点,包括在庞大的数据集上进行训练,以及使用嵌入空间来捕捉语义关系。论文讨论了 FMs 最近在推理能力方面取得的进展,我们认为这不能归因于模型规模的扩大,而是因为新颖的训练技术产生了摸索等学习现象。此外,我们还讨论了为调频装置设定基准所面临的挑战,并将调频装置的结构与人脑进行了比较。我们认为,虽然调频模型在推理和知识表示方面取得了可喜的发展,但理解其内部运作仍然是一项重大挑战,这与神经科学为理解人脑功能所做的努力相似。尽管调频有一些相似之处,但调频与人脑结构之间的根本差异告诫我们不要进行直接比较,也不要指望神经科学能立即提供有关调频功能的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding Foundation Models: Are We Back in 1924?
This position paper explores the rapid development of Foundation Models (FMs) in AI and their implications for intelligence and reasoning. It examines the characteristics of FMs, including their training on vast datasets and use of embedding spaces to capture semantic relationships. The paper discusses recent advancements in FMs' reasoning abilities which we argue cannot be attributed to increased model size but to novel training techniques which yield learning phenomena like grokking. It also addresses the challenges in benchmarking FMs and compares their structure to the human brain. We argue that while FMs show promising developments in reasoning and knowledge representation, understanding their inner workings remains a significant challenge, similar to ongoing efforts in neuroscience to comprehend human brain function. Despite having some similarities, fundamental differences between FMs and the structure of human brain warn us against making direct comparisons or expecting neuroscience to provide immediate insights into FM function.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abductive explanations of classifiers under constraints: Complexity and properties Explaining Non-monotonic Normative Reasoning using Argumentation Theory with Deontic Logic Towards Explainable Goal Recognition Using Weight of Evidence (WoE): A Human-Centered Approach A Metric Hybrid Planning Approach to Solving Pandemic Planning Problems with Simple SIR Models Neural Networks for Vehicle Routing Problem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1