公共利益还是个人利益:对中国再分配政策的认识偏差

IF 2.5 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS Kybernetes Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1108/k-05-2024-1303
Tian Liu, Meng Shen
{"title":"公共利益还是个人利益:对中国再分配政策的认识偏差","authors":"Tian Liu, Meng Shen","doi":"10.1108/k-05-2024-1303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Redistributive policies aim to reduce income disparities and improve social equity. This study investigates whether redistributive effects that successfully diminish objective income inequality also effectively alter people’s perceptions of inequality.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Utilizing data from the 2018 China Household Income Survey (CHIP), comprising 56,167 individuals, this study applies ordered probability regression (Oprobit) and ordinary least squares (OLS) for analysis. To address potential biases in estimates, we employed the generalized propensity score matching (GPSM) method to estimate the treatment effect of transfer income on perceptions of inequality.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results indicate that while China’s redistribution policies effectively reduce income disparities, they do not improve perceptions of inequality. Individuals exhibit biased attitudes toward redistributive policies. Specifically, perceptions of inequality are insensitive to the overall redistributive effect; the relationship is negative among the poor but positive among the rich. This contradictory pattern may be attributed to perceived income losses among the rich and gains among the poor.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>The findings have important implications for policy development. Redistribution policies should not only aim to mitigate income disparities but also address and improve people’s perceptions of inequality.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Existing literature has largely overlooked the impact of redistribution on perceived income inequality. This study represents an early effort to explore whether redistributive policies that reduce income inequality also influence people’s perceptions of inequality.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":49930,"journal":{"name":"Kybernetes","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public interest or individual benefit: biased perception toward Chinese redistributive policies\",\"authors\":\"Tian Liu, Meng Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/k-05-2024-1303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Redistributive policies aim to reduce income disparities and improve social equity. This study investigates whether redistributive effects that successfully diminish objective income inequality also effectively alter people’s perceptions of inequality.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>Utilizing data from the 2018 China Household Income Survey (CHIP), comprising 56,167 individuals, this study applies ordered probability regression (Oprobit) and ordinary least squares (OLS) for analysis. To address potential biases in estimates, we employed the generalized propensity score matching (GPSM) method to estimate the treatment effect of transfer income on perceptions of inequality.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The results indicate that while China’s redistribution policies effectively reduce income disparities, they do not improve perceptions of inequality. Individuals exhibit biased attitudes toward redistributive policies. Specifically, perceptions of inequality are insensitive to the overall redistributive effect; the relationship is negative among the poor but positive among the rich. This contradictory pattern may be attributed to perceived income losses among the rich and gains among the poor.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\\n<p>The findings have important implications for policy development. Redistribution policies should not only aim to mitigate income disparities but also address and improve people’s perceptions of inequality.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>Existing literature has largely overlooked the impact of redistribution on perceived income inequality. This study represents an early effort to explore whether redistributive policies that reduce income inequality also influence people’s perceptions of inequality.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":49930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kybernetes\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kybernetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/k-05-2024-1303\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kybernetes","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/k-05-2024-1303","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的再分配政策旨在缩小收入差距,改善社会公平。本研究探讨了成功缩小客观收入不平等的再分配效应是否也能有效改变人们对不平等的认知。设计/方法/途径本研究利用 2018 年中国居民收入调查(CHIP)的数据(共 56167 人),采用有序概率回归(Oprobit)和普通最小二乘法(OLS)进行分析。为了解决估计中可能存在的偏差,我们采用了广义倾向得分匹配法(GPSM)来估计转移性收入对不平等感的处理效果。研究结果表明,虽然中国的再分配政策有效地缩小了收入差距,但并没有改善人们对不平等的看法。个人对再分配政策的态度存在偏差。具体而言,对不平等的看法对总体再分配效果并不敏感;在穷人中这种关系是负的,而在富人中则是正的。这一矛盾模式可能是由于富人认为收入减少,而穷人认为收入增加。现有文献在很大程度上忽视了再分配对收入不平等感的影响。本研究是探索减少收入不平等的再分配政策是否也会影响人们对不平等的看法的早期尝试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Public interest or individual benefit: biased perception toward Chinese redistributive policies

Purpose

Redistributive policies aim to reduce income disparities and improve social equity. This study investigates whether redistributive effects that successfully diminish objective income inequality also effectively alter people’s perceptions of inequality.

Design/methodology/approach

Utilizing data from the 2018 China Household Income Survey (CHIP), comprising 56,167 individuals, this study applies ordered probability regression (Oprobit) and ordinary least squares (OLS) for analysis. To address potential biases in estimates, we employed the generalized propensity score matching (GPSM) method to estimate the treatment effect of transfer income on perceptions of inequality.

Findings

The results indicate that while China’s redistribution policies effectively reduce income disparities, they do not improve perceptions of inequality. Individuals exhibit biased attitudes toward redistributive policies. Specifically, perceptions of inequality are insensitive to the overall redistributive effect; the relationship is negative among the poor but positive among the rich. This contradictory pattern may be attributed to perceived income losses among the rich and gains among the poor.

Social implications

The findings have important implications for policy development. Redistribution policies should not only aim to mitigate income disparities but also address and improve people’s perceptions of inequality.

Originality/value

Existing literature has largely overlooked the impact of redistribution on perceived income inequality. This study represents an early effort to explore whether redistributive policies that reduce income inequality also influence people’s perceptions of inequality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kybernetes
Kybernetes 工程技术-计算机:控制论
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.00%
发文量
237
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: Kybernetes is the official journal of the UNESCO recognized World Organisation of Systems and Cybernetics (WOSC), and The Cybernetics Society. The journal is an important forum for the exchange of knowledge and information among all those who are interested in cybernetics and systems thinking. It is devoted to improvement in the understanding of human, social, organizational, technological and sustainable aspects of society and their interdependencies. It encourages consideration of a range of theories, methodologies and approaches, and their transdisciplinary links. The spirit of the journal comes from Norbert Wiener''s understanding of cybernetics as "The Human Use of Human Beings." Hence, Kybernetes strives for examination and analysis, based on a systemic frame of reference, of burning issues of ecosystems, society, organizations, businesses and human behavior.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the effect of collaboration modes on firms’ breakthrough technological innovation: a perspective from the innovation ecosystem Dynamic game research of food agricultural products supply chain based on blockchain traceability technology Parallels between the Physical Vacuum and concept of Qi in Medical Qigong: comprehending oneness Risk transmission and diversification strategies between US real estate investment trusts (REITs) and green finance indices Urban carrying capacity of industrial cities to typhoon-induced Natechs: a cloud Bayesian model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1