口服抗凝剂与口服二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂同时使用与严重出血事件

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1002/cpt.3442
Thanh Phuong Pham Nguyen, Charles E. Leonard, Colleen M. Brensinger, Warren B. Bilker, Sophie P. Chung, John R. Horn, Kacie Bogar, Todd A. Miano, Sean Hennessy
{"title":"口服抗凝剂与口服二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂同时使用与严重出血事件","authors":"Thanh Phuong Pham Nguyen, Charles E. Leonard, Colleen M. Brensinger, Warren B. Bilker, Sophie P. Chung, John R. Horn, Kacie Bogar, Todd A. Miano, Sean Hennessy","doi":"10.1002/cpt.3442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a prior screening study, saxagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor (DPP‐4i), was found to have an increased rate of serious bleeding when used concomitantly with several oral anticoagulants (OACs). We aimed to confirm or refute the associations between concomitant use of individual OACs and DPP‐4is and serious bleeding in a large US database, using self‐controlled case series (SCCS) and case‐crossover (CCO) designs. The study population was eligible Medicare beneficiaries co‐exposed to a DPP‐4i (precipitant) and either an OAC (object drug) or lisinopril (negative control object drug) in 2016–2020. For the SCCS, we used conditional Poisson regression to estimate adjusted rate ratios (RRs) between each co‐exposure (vs. not) and serious bleeding and divided the RR by the adjusted RR for the corresponding lisinopril + precipitant pair to obtain ratios of RRs (RRRs). For the CCO, we estimated the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of exposure to the precipitant in the focal window vs. referent window using multivariable conditional logistic regression and divided the ORs in the object drug‐exposed cases over the ORs in negative object drug‐exposed cases to obtain the ratios of ORs (RORs). The adjusted RRRs for serious bleeding ranged from 0.32 (0.05–1.91) for apixaban/lisinopril + saxagliptin to 3.49 (1.29–9.48) for warfarin/lisinopril + linagliptin. The adjusted RORs ranged from 0.01 (0.00–0.20) for rivaroxaban/lisinopril + saxagliptin to 2.99 (0.74–12.11) for apixaban/lisinopril + linagliptin. While we could not confirm previously identified signals because of statistical imprecision, several numerically elevated estimates still warrant caution in concomitant use and further examination.","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concomitant Use of Oral Anticoagulants with Oral Dipeptidyl Peptidase‐4 Inhibitors and Serious Bleeding Events\",\"authors\":\"Thanh Phuong Pham Nguyen, Charles E. Leonard, Colleen M. Brensinger, Warren B. Bilker, Sophie P. Chung, John R. Horn, Kacie Bogar, Todd A. Miano, Sean Hennessy\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpt.3442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a prior screening study, saxagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor (DPP‐4i), was found to have an increased rate of serious bleeding when used concomitantly with several oral anticoagulants (OACs). We aimed to confirm or refute the associations between concomitant use of individual OACs and DPP‐4is and serious bleeding in a large US database, using self‐controlled case series (SCCS) and case‐crossover (CCO) designs. The study population was eligible Medicare beneficiaries co‐exposed to a DPP‐4i (precipitant) and either an OAC (object drug) or lisinopril (negative control object drug) in 2016–2020. For the SCCS, we used conditional Poisson regression to estimate adjusted rate ratios (RRs) between each co‐exposure (vs. not) and serious bleeding and divided the RR by the adjusted RR for the corresponding lisinopril + precipitant pair to obtain ratios of RRs (RRRs). For the CCO, we estimated the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of exposure to the precipitant in the focal window vs. referent window using multivariable conditional logistic regression and divided the ORs in the object drug‐exposed cases over the ORs in negative object drug‐exposed cases to obtain the ratios of ORs (RORs). The adjusted RRRs for serious bleeding ranged from 0.32 (0.05–1.91) for apixaban/lisinopril + saxagliptin to 3.49 (1.29–9.48) for warfarin/lisinopril + linagliptin. The adjusted RORs ranged from 0.01 (0.00–0.20) for rivaroxaban/lisinopril + saxagliptin to 2.99 (0.74–12.11) for apixaban/lisinopril + linagliptin. While we could not confirm previously identified signals because of statistical imprecision, several numerically elevated estimates still warrant caution in concomitant use and further examination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3442\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3442","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在之前的一项筛选研究中,发现二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂 (DPP-4i) 沙格列汀与几种口服抗凝剂 (OAC) 同时使用时,严重出血的发生率会增加。我们的目的是利用自控病例系列(SCCS)和病例交叉(CCO)设计,在一个大型美国数据库中证实或反驳同时使用个别 OACs 和 DPP-4is 与严重出血之间的关联。研究对象是在 2016-2020 年期间共同接触过 DPP-4i(诱导剂)和 OAC(目标药物)或赖欣诺普利(阴性对照目标药物)的符合条件的医疗保险受益人。对于 SCCS,我们使用条件泊松回归来估算每种共同暴露(与未共同暴露)和严重出血之间的调整率比 (RR),并将 RR 除以相应的利辛普利 + 促效剂配对的调整率比,以获得 RR 比 (RRR)。对于 CCO,我们使用多变量条件逻辑回归估算了病灶窗与参照窗暴露于沉淀剂的调整后几率比(ORs),并将对象药物暴露病例的几率比除以对象药物阴性暴露病例的几率比,得出几率比(RORs)。阿哌沙班/利辛普利+沙格列汀的严重出血调整RRR为0.32(0.05-1.91),华法林/利辛普利+利拉利汀的严重出血调整RRR为3.49(1.29-9.48)。利伐沙班/利辛普利+沙格列汀的调整ROR为0.01(0.00-0.20),阿哌沙班/利辛普利+利拉利汀的调整ROR为2.99(0.74-12.11)。虽然由于统计不精确,我们无法确认之前确定的信号,但几个数值升高的估计值仍值得在同时使用时谨慎对待,并进行进一步检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Concomitant Use of Oral Anticoagulants with Oral Dipeptidyl Peptidase‐4 Inhibitors and Serious Bleeding Events
In a prior screening study, saxagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor (DPP‐4i), was found to have an increased rate of serious bleeding when used concomitantly with several oral anticoagulants (OACs). We aimed to confirm or refute the associations between concomitant use of individual OACs and DPP‐4is and serious bleeding in a large US database, using self‐controlled case series (SCCS) and case‐crossover (CCO) designs. The study population was eligible Medicare beneficiaries co‐exposed to a DPP‐4i (precipitant) and either an OAC (object drug) or lisinopril (negative control object drug) in 2016–2020. For the SCCS, we used conditional Poisson regression to estimate adjusted rate ratios (RRs) between each co‐exposure (vs. not) and serious bleeding and divided the RR by the adjusted RR for the corresponding lisinopril + precipitant pair to obtain ratios of RRs (RRRs). For the CCO, we estimated the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of exposure to the precipitant in the focal window vs. referent window using multivariable conditional logistic regression and divided the ORs in the object drug‐exposed cases over the ORs in negative object drug‐exposed cases to obtain the ratios of ORs (RORs). The adjusted RRRs for serious bleeding ranged from 0.32 (0.05–1.91) for apixaban/lisinopril + saxagliptin to 3.49 (1.29–9.48) for warfarin/lisinopril + linagliptin. The adjusted RORs ranged from 0.01 (0.00–0.20) for rivaroxaban/lisinopril + saxagliptin to 2.99 (0.74–12.11) for apixaban/lisinopril + linagliptin. While we could not confirm previously identified signals because of statistical imprecision, several numerically elevated estimates still warrant caution in concomitant use and further examination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
期刊最新文献
Cerebral Ischemia Protection After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: CSF Nimodipine Levels After Intravenous Versus Oral Nimodipine Administration. Contemporary Use of β-Blockers in Heart Failure Patients With and Without Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Database Analysis. Correction to Effectively Leveraging RWD for External Controls: A Systematic Literature Review of Regulatory and HTA Decisions. Infection Risk Associated with High-Efficacy Disease-Modifying Agents in Multiple Sclerosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study. In This Issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1