房屋分配中的加权羡慕嫉妒恨

Sijia Dai, Yankai Chen, Xiaowei Wu, Yicheng Xu, Yong Zhang
{"title":"房屋分配中的加权羡慕嫉妒恨","authors":"Sijia Dai, Yankai Chen, Xiaowei Wu, Yicheng Xu, Yong Zhang","doi":"arxiv-2408.12523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The classic house allocation problem involves assigning $m$ houses to $n$\nagents based on their utility functions, ensuring each agent receives exactly\none house. A key criterion in these problems is satisfying fairness constraints\nsuch as envy-freeness. We extend this problem by considering agents with\narbitrary weights, focusing on the concept of weighted envy-freeness, which has\nbeen extensively studied in fair division. We present a polynomial-time\nalgorithm to determine whether weighted envy-free allocations exist and, if so,\nto compute one. Since weighted envy-free allocations do not always exist, we\nalso investigate the potential of achieving such allocations through the use of\nsubsidies. We provide several characterizations for weighted envy-freeable\nallocations (allocations that can be turned weighted envy-free by introducing\nsubsidies) and show that they do not always exist, which is different from the\nunweighted setting. Furthermore, we explore the existence of weighted\nenvy-freeable allocations in specific scenarios and outline the conditions\nunder which they exist.","PeriodicalId":501316,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weighted Envy-Freeness in House Allocation\",\"authors\":\"Sijia Dai, Yankai Chen, Xiaowei Wu, Yicheng Xu, Yong Zhang\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.12523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The classic house allocation problem involves assigning $m$ houses to $n$\\nagents based on their utility functions, ensuring each agent receives exactly\\none house. A key criterion in these problems is satisfying fairness constraints\\nsuch as envy-freeness. We extend this problem by considering agents with\\narbitrary weights, focusing on the concept of weighted envy-freeness, which has\\nbeen extensively studied in fair division. We present a polynomial-time\\nalgorithm to determine whether weighted envy-free allocations exist and, if so,\\nto compute one. Since weighted envy-free allocations do not always exist, we\\nalso investigate the potential of achieving such allocations through the use of\\nsubsidies. We provide several characterizations for weighted envy-freeable\\nallocations (allocations that can be turned weighted envy-free by introducing\\nsubsidies) and show that they do not always exist, which is different from the\\nunweighted setting. Furthermore, we explore the existence of weighted\\nenvy-freeable allocations in specific scenarios and outline the conditions\\nunder which they exist.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.12523\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.12523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经典的房屋分配问题包括根据代理人的效用函数,将 $m$ 的房屋分配给 $n$ 的代理人,确保每个代理人都能得到一套房子。这些问题中的一个关键标准是满足公平约束,如不受嫉妒约束。我们通过考虑具有任意权重的代理来扩展这一问题,重点关注加权无嫉妒概念,该概念已在公平分配中得到广泛研究。我们提出了一种多项式时间算法来确定是否存在加权无嫉妒分配,如果存在,则计算出一个加权无嫉妒分配。由于加权无嫉妒分配并不总是存在,我们还研究了通过使用补贴来实现这种分配的可能性。我们为加权无嫉妒分配(通过引入补贴可以变成加权无嫉妒的分配)提供了几个特征,并证明它们并不总是存在,这与无加权设置不同。此外,我们还探讨了特定情况下加权免嫉妒分配的存在性,并概述了它们存在的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Weighted Envy-Freeness in House Allocation
The classic house allocation problem involves assigning $m$ houses to $n$ agents based on their utility functions, ensuring each agent receives exactly one house. A key criterion in these problems is satisfying fairness constraints such as envy-freeness. We extend this problem by considering agents with arbitrary weights, focusing on the concept of weighted envy-freeness, which has been extensively studied in fair division. We present a polynomial-time algorithm to determine whether weighted envy-free allocations exist and, if so, to compute one. Since weighted envy-free allocations do not always exist, we also investigate the potential of achieving such allocations through the use of subsidies. We provide several characterizations for weighted envy-freeable allocations (allocations that can be turned weighted envy-free by introducing subsidies) and show that they do not always exist, which is different from the unweighted setting. Furthermore, we explore the existence of weighted envy-freeable allocations in specific scenarios and outline the conditions under which they exist.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MALADY: Multiclass Active Learning with Auction Dynamics on Graphs Mechanism Design for Extending the Accessibility of Facilities Common revenue allocation in DMUs with two stages based on DEA cross-efficiency and cooperative game The common revenue allocation based on modified Shapley value and DEA cross-efficiency On Robustness to $k$-wise Independence of Optimal Bayesian Mechanisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1