在加权投票博弈中通过增加玩家来改变或维持沙普利-舒比克或彭罗斯-班扎夫力量指数的控制对于 NP^PP 是完全的

Joanna Kaczmarek, Jörg Rothe
{"title":"在加权投票博弈中通过增加玩家来改变或维持沙普利-舒比克或彭罗斯-班扎夫力量指数的控制对于 NP^PP 是完全的","authors":"Joanna Kaczmarek, Jörg Rothe","doi":"arxiv-2408.09953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Weighted voting games are a well-known and useful class of succinctly\nrepresentable simple games that have many real-world applications, e.g., to\nmodel collective decision-making in legislative bodies or shareholder voting.\nAmong the structural control types being analyzing, one is control by adding\nplayers to weighted voting games, so as to either change or to maintain a\nplayer's power in the sense of the (probabilistic) Penrose-Banzhaf power index\nor the Shapley-Shubik power index. For the problems related to this control,\nthe best known lower bound is PP-hardness, where PP is \"probabilistic\npolynomial time,\" and the best known upper bound is the class NP^PP, i.e., the\nclass NP with a PP oracle. We optimally raise this lower bound by showing\nNP^PP-hardness of all these problems for the Penrose-Banzhaf and the\nShapley-Shubik indices, thus establishing completeness for them in that class.\nOur proof technique may turn out to be useful for solving other open problems\nrelated to weighted voting games with such a complexity gap as well.","PeriodicalId":501316,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Control by Adding Players to Change or Maintain the Shapley-Shubik or the Penrose-Banzhaf Power Index in Weighted Voting Games Is Complete for NP^PP\",\"authors\":\"Joanna Kaczmarek, Jörg Rothe\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.09953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Weighted voting games are a well-known and useful class of succinctly\\nrepresentable simple games that have many real-world applications, e.g., to\\nmodel collective decision-making in legislative bodies or shareholder voting.\\nAmong the structural control types being analyzing, one is control by adding\\nplayers to weighted voting games, so as to either change or to maintain a\\nplayer's power in the sense of the (probabilistic) Penrose-Banzhaf power index\\nor the Shapley-Shubik power index. For the problems related to this control,\\nthe best known lower bound is PP-hardness, where PP is \\\"probabilistic\\npolynomial time,\\\" and the best known upper bound is the class NP^PP, i.e., the\\nclass NP with a PP oracle. We optimally raise this lower bound by showing\\nNP^PP-hardness of all these problems for the Penrose-Banzhaf and the\\nShapley-Shubik indices, thus establishing completeness for them in that class.\\nOur proof technique may turn out to be useful for solving other open problems\\nrelated to weighted voting games with such a complexity gap as well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.09953\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.09953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加权投票博弈是一类著名而有用的可简洁表示的简单博弈,在现实世界中有许多应用,例如,用来模拟立法机构的集体决策或股东投票。在正在分析的结构控制类型中,有一种是通过在加权投票博弈中加入玩家来进行控制,从而改变或保持玩家在(概率)彭罗斯-班扎夫力量指数或沙普利-舒比克力量指数意义上的力量。对于与这种控制有关的问题,已知的最佳下界是 PP-硬度,其中 PP 是 "概率多项式时间",已知的最佳上限是 NP^PP 类,即有 PP 甲骨文的 NP 类。我们通过证明所有这些问题对于彭罗斯-班扎夫指数和沙普利-舒比克指数的NP^PP-硬性,从而最优化地提高了这一下界,从而在该类中建立了问题的完备性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Control by Adding Players to Change or Maintain the Shapley-Shubik or the Penrose-Banzhaf Power Index in Weighted Voting Games Is Complete for NP^PP
Weighted voting games are a well-known and useful class of succinctly representable simple games that have many real-world applications, e.g., to model collective decision-making in legislative bodies or shareholder voting. Among the structural control types being analyzing, one is control by adding players to weighted voting games, so as to either change or to maintain a player's power in the sense of the (probabilistic) Penrose-Banzhaf power index or the Shapley-Shubik power index. For the problems related to this control, the best known lower bound is PP-hardness, where PP is "probabilistic polynomial time," and the best known upper bound is the class NP^PP, i.e., the class NP with a PP oracle. We optimally raise this lower bound by showing NP^PP-hardness of all these problems for the Penrose-Banzhaf and the Shapley-Shubik indices, thus establishing completeness for them in that class. Our proof technique may turn out to be useful for solving other open problems related to weighted voting games with such a complexity gap as well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MALADY: Multiclass Active Learning with Auction Dynamics on Graphs Mechanism Design for Extending the Accessibility of Facilities Common revenue allocation in DMUs with two stages based on DEA cross-efficiency and cooperative game The common revenue allocation based on modified Shapley value and DEA cross-efficiency On Robustness to $k$-wise Independence of Optimal Bayesian Mechanisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1