图上 k 条件游戏的操纵复杂性

Hodaya Barr, Yohai Trabelsi, Sarit Kraus, Liam Roditty, Noam Hazon
{"title":"图上 k 条件游戏的操纵复杂性","authors":"Hodaya Barr, Yohai Trabelsi, Sarit Kraus, Liam Roditty, Noam Hazon","doi":"arxiv-2408.07368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many settings, there is an organizer who would like to divide a set of\nagents into $k$ coalitions, and cares about the friendships within each\ncoalition. Specifically, the organizer might want to maximize utilitarian\nsocial welfare, maximize egalitarian social welfare, or simply guarantee that\nevery agent will have at least one friend within his coalition. However, in\nmany situations, the organizer is not familiar with the friendship connections,\nand he needs to obtain them from the agents. In this setting, a manipulative\nagent may falsely report friendship connections in order to increase his\nutility. In this paper, we analyze the complexity of finding manipulation in\nsuch $k$-coalitional games on graphs. We also introduce a new type of\nmanipulation, socially-aware manipulation, in which the manipulator would like\nto increase his utility without decreasing the social welfare. We then study\nthe complexity of finding socially-aware manipulation in our setting. Finally,\nwe examine the frequency of socially-aware manipulation and the running time of\nour algorithms via simulation results.","PeriodicalId":501316,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Complexity of Manipulation of k-Coalitional Games on Graphs\",\"authors\":\"Hodaya Barr, Yohai Trabelsi, Sarit Kraus, Liam Roditty, Noam Hazon\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.07368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In many settings, there is an organizer who would like to divide a set of\\nagents into $k$ coalitions, and cares about the friendships within each\\ncoalition. Specifically, the organizer might want to maximize utilitarian\\nsocial welfare, maximize egalitarian social welfare, or simply guarantee that\\nevery agent will have at least one friend within his coalition. However, in\\nmany situations, the organizer is not familiar with the friendship connections,\\nand he needs to obtain them from the agents. In this setting, a manipulative\\nagent may falsely report friendship connections in order to increase his\\nutility. In this paper, we analyze the complexity of finding manipulation in\\nsuch $k$-coalitional games on graphs. We also introduce a new type of\\nmanipulation, socially-aware manipulation, in which the manipulator would like\\nto increase his utility without decreasing the social welfare. We then study\\nthe complexity of finding socially-aware manipulation in our setting. Finally,\\nwe examine the frequency of socially-aware manipulation and the running time of\\nour algorithms via simulation results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.07368\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.07368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在许多情况下,组织者希望将一组代理人分成 $k$ 联盟,并关心每个联盟内的友谊。具体来说,组织者可能希望最大化功利主义社会福利,最大化平等主义社会福利,或者只是保证每个代理人在他的联盟中至少有一个朋友。然而,在很多情况下,组织者并不熟悉友谊关系,他需要从代理人那里获取友谊关系。在这种情况下,操纵者可能会谎报友谊关系,以增加自己的效用。在本文中,我们分析了在图上的 $k$ 联立博弈中寻找操纵的复杂性。我们还引入了一种新型操纵--社会意识操纵,在这种操纵中,操纵者希望在不减少社会福利的情况下增加自己的效用。然后,我们研究了在我们的设置中找到具有社会意识的操纵的复杂性。最后,我们通过模拟结果检验了社会意识操纵的频率和我们算法的运行时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Complexity of Manipulation of k-Coalitional Games on Graphs
In many settings, there is an organizer who would like to divide a set of agents into $k$ coalitions, and cares about the friendships within each coalition. Specifically, the organizer might want to maximize utilitarian social welfare, maximize egalitarian social welfare, or simply guarantee that every agent will have at least one friend within his coalition. However, in many situations, the organizer is not familiar with the friendship connections, and he needs to obtain them from the agents. In this setting, a manipulative agent may falsely report friendship connections in order to increase his utility. In this paper, we analyze the complexity of finding manipulation in such $k$-coalitional games on graphs. We also introduce a new type of manipulation, socially-aware manipulation, in which the manipulator would like to increase his utility without decreasing the social welfare. We then study the complexity of finding socially-aware manipulation in our setting. Finally, we examine the frequency of socially-aware manipulation and the running time of our algorithms via simulation results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MALADY: Multiclass Active Learning with Auction Dynamics on Graphs Mechanism Design for Extending the Accessibility of Facilities Common revenue allocation in DMUs with two stages based on DEA cross-efficiency and cooperative game The common revenue allocation based on modified Shapley value and DEA cross-efficiency On Robustness to $k$-wise Independence of Optimal Bayesian Mechanisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1