加权锦标赛解决方案的胜率

Michelle Döring, Jannik Peters
{"title":"加权锦标赛解决方案的胜率","authors":"Michelle Döring, Jannik Peters","doi":"arxiv-2408.06873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Determining how close a winner of an election is to becoming a loser, or\ndistinguishing between different possible winners of an election, are major\nproblems in computational social choice. We tackle these problems for so-called\nweighted tournament solutions by generalizing the notion of margin of victory\n(MoV) for tournament solutions by Brill et. al to weighted tournament\nsolutions. For these, the MoV of a winner (resp. loser) is the total weight\nthat needs to be changed in the tournament to make them a loser (resp. winner).\nWe study three weighted tournament solutions: Borda's rule, the weighted\nUncovered Set, and Split Cycle. For all three rules, we determine whether the\nMoV for winners and non-winners is tractable and give upper and lower bounds on\nthe possible values of the MoV. Further, we axiomatically study and generalize\nproperties from the unweighted tournament setting to weighted tournaments.","PeriodicalId":501316,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory","volume":"121 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Margin of Victory for Weighted Tournament Solutions\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Döring, Jannik Peters\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.06873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Determining how close a winner of an election is to becoming a loser, or\\ndistinguishing between different possible winners of an election, are major\\nproblems in computational social choice. We tackle these problems for so-called\\nweighted tournament solutions by generalizing the notion of margin of victory\\n(MoV) for tournament solutions by Brill et. al to weighted tournament\\nsolutions. For these, the MoV of a winner (resp. loser) is the total weight\\nthat needs to be changed in the tournament to make them a loser (resp. winner).\\nWe study three weighted tournament solutions: Borda's rule, the weighted\\nUncovered Set, and Split Cycle. For all three rules, we determine whether the\\nMoV for winners and non-winners is tractable and give upper and lower bounds on\\nthe possible values of the MoV. Further, we axiomatically study and generalize\\nproperties from the unweighted tournament setting to weighted tournaments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory\",\"volume\":\"121 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.06873\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.06873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定选举中的获胜者距离成为失败者有多近,以及区分选举中不同可能的获胜者,是计算社会选择中的主要问题。我们将布里尔等人提出的锦标赛解的胜负差(MoV)概念推广到加权锦标赛解,从而解决了所谓加权锦标赛解的这些问题。我们研究了三种加权锦标赛解决方案:我们研究了三种加权锦标赛解决方案:博尔达规则、加权无覆盖集规则和分割循环规则。我们研究了三种加权锦标赛解决方案:博尔达规则、加权无覆盖集规则和分割循环规则。对于所有三种规则,我们都确定了胜者和非胜者的 MoV 值是否可行,并给出了 MoV 可能值的上下限。此外,我们还从公理上研究并将非加权锦标赛的特性推广到加权锦标赛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Margin of Victory for Weighted Tournament Solutions
Determining how close a winner of an election is to becoming a loser, or distinguishing between different possible winners of an election, are major problems in computational social choice. We tackle these problems for so-called weighted tournament solutions by generalizing the notion of margin of victory (MoV) for tournament solutions by Brill et. al to weighted tournament solutions. For these, the MoV of a winner (resp. loser) is the total weight that needs to be changed in the tournament to make them a loser (resp. winner). We study three weighted tournament solutions: Borda's rule, the weighted Uncovered Set, and Split Cycle. For all three rules, we determine whether the MoV for winners and non-winners is tractable and give upper and lower bounds on the possible values of the MoV. Further, we axiomatically study and generalize properties from the unweighted tournament setting to weighted tournaments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MALADY: Multiclass Active Learning with Auction Dynamics on Graphs Mechanism Design for Extending the Accessibility of Facilities Common revenue allocation in DMUs with two stages based on DEA cross-efficiency and cooperative game The common revenue allocation based on modified Shapley value and DEA cross-efficiency On Robustness to $k$-wise Independence of Optimal Bayesian Mechanisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1