{"title":"超越纳什均衡:通过信念更新虚构游戏实现贝叶斯完全均衡","authors":"Qi Ju, Zhemei Fang, Yunfeng Luo","doi":"arxiv-2409.02706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the domain of machine learning and game theory, the quest for Nash\nEquilibrium (NE) in extensive-form games with incomplete information is\nchallenging yet crucial for enhancing AI's decision-making support under varied\nscenarios. Traditional Counterfactual Regret Minimization (CFR) techniques\nexcel in navigating towards NE, focusing on scenarios where opponents deploy\noptimal strategies. However, the essence of machine learning in strategic game\nplay extends beyond reacting to optimal moves; it encompasses aiding human\ndecision-making in all circumstances. This includes not only crafting responses\nto optimal strategies but also recovering from suboptimal decisions and\ncapitalizing on opponents' errors. Herein lies the significance of\ntransitioning from NE to Bayesian Perfect Equilibrium (BPE), which accounts for\nevery possible condition, including the irrationality of opponents. To bridge this gap, we propose Belief Update Fictitious Play (BUFP), which\ninnovatively blends fictitious play with belief to target BPE, a more\ncomprehensive equilibrium concept than NE. Specifically, through adjusting\niteration stepsizes, BUFP allows for strategic convergence to both NE and BPE.\nFor instance, in our experiments, BUFP(EF) leverages the stepsize of Extensive\nForm Fictitious Play (EFFP) to achieve BPE, outperforming traditional CFR by\nsecuring a 48.53\\% increase in benefits in scenarios characterized by dominated\nstrategies.","PeriodicalId":501316,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Nash Equilibrium: Achieving Bayesian Perfect Equilibrium with Belief Update Fictitious Play\",\"authors\":\"Qi Ju, Zhemei Fang, Yunfeng Luo\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.02706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the domain of machine learning and game theory, the quest for Nash\\nEquilibrium (NE) in extensive-form games with incomplete information is\\nchallenging yet crucial for enhancing AI's decision-making support under varied\\nscenarios. Traditional Counterfactual Regret Minimization (CFR) techniques\\nexcel in navigating towards NE, focusing on scenarios where opponents deploy\\noptimal strategies. However, the essence of machine learning in strategic game\\nplay extends beyond reacting to optimal moves; it encompasses aiding human\\ndecision-making in all circumstances. This includes not only crafting responses\\nto optimal strategies but also recovering from suboptimal decisions and\\ncapitalizing on opponents' errors. Herein lies the significance of\\ntransitioning from NE to Bayesian Perfect Equilibrium (BPE), which accounts for\\nevery possible condition, including the irrationality of opponents. To bridge this gap, we propose Belief Update Fictitious Play (BUFP), which\\ninnovatively blends fictitious play with belief to target BPE, a more\\ncomprehensive equilibrium concept than NE. Specifically, through adjusting\\niteration stepsizes, BUFP allows for strategic convergence to both NE and BPE.\\nFor instance, in our experiments, BUFP(EF) leverages the stepsize of Extensive\\nForm Fictitious Play (EFFP) to achieve BPE, outperforming traditional CFR by\\nsecuring a 48.53\\\\% increase in benefits in scenarios characterized by dominated\\nstrategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.02706\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.02706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在机器学习和博弈论领域,在信息不完全的广式博弈中寻求纳什均衡(NashEquilibrium,NE)是一项挑战,但对于增强人工智能在各种场景下的决策支持至关重要。传统的 "反事实遗憾最小化"(CFR)技术能很好地实现 NE 导航,重点关注对手部署最佳策略的场景。然而,战略游戏中机器学习的本质不仅仅是对最优策略做出反应,它还包括在所有情况下帮助人类做出决策。这不仅包括对最优策略做出反应,还包括从次优决策中恢复,以及利用对手的失误。从 NE 过渡到贝叶斯完美均衡(BPE)的意义就在于此,后者考虑了所有可能的情况,包括对手的非理性。为了弥补这一差距,我们提出了 "信念更新虚构对局"(BUFP),它创新性地将虚构对局与信念相结合,以贝叶斯完美均衡(BPE)为目标,这是一个比NE更全面的均衡概念。例如,在我们的实验中,BUFP(EF)利用扩展形式虚构博弈(ExtensiveForm Fictitious Play,EFFP)的步长来实现 BPE,其表现优于传统的 CFR,在以主导战略为特征的场景中确保了 48.53% 的收益增长。
Beyond Nash Equilibrium: Achieving Bayesian Perfect Equilibrium with Belief Update Fictitious Play
In the domain of machine learning and game theory, the quest for Nash
Equilibrium (NE) in extensive-form games with incomplete information is
challenging yet crucial for enhancing AI's decision-making support under varied
scenarios. Traditional Counterfactual Regret Minimization (CFR) techniques
excel in navigating towards NE, focusing on scenarios where opponents deploy
optimal strategies. However, the essence of machine learning in strategic game
play extends beyond reacting to optimal moves; it encompasses aiding human
decision-making in all circumstances. This includes not only crafting responses
to optimal strategies but also recovering from suboptimal decisions and
capitalizing on opponents' errors. Herein lies the significance of
transitioning from NE to Bayesian Perfect Equilibrium (BPE), which accounts for
every possible condition, including the irrationality of opponents. To bridge this gap, we propose Belief Update Fictitious Play (BUFP), which
innovatively blends fictitious play with belief to target BPE, a more
comprehensive equilibrium concept than NE. Specifically, through adjusting
iteration stepsizes, BUFP allows for strategic convergence to both NE and BPE.
For instance, in our experiments, BUFP(EF) leverages the stepsize of Extensive
Form Fictitious Play (EFFP) to achieve BPE, outperforming traditional CFR by
securing a 48.53\% increase in benefits in scenarios characterized by dominated
strategies.