揭示用户采用和推荐央行数字货币意图的影响机制:行为推理理论视角

IF 11 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104050
Jiaqi Wu, Xin Liu, Chenghu Zhang
{"title":"揭示用户采用和推荐央行数字货币意图的影响机制:行为推理理论视角","authors":"Jiaqi Wu, Xin Liu, Chenghu Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the enormous benefits of the implementation of central bank digital currency (CBDC), the realization of these anticipated benefits depends on users' adoption and recommendations resulting from the consideration of both facilitators and inhibitors. Drawing on the behavioral reasoning theory (BRT), this study endeavors to unveil the influencing mechanism underlying users' CBDC adoption and recommend intentions using a hybrid approach integrating qualitative study (i.e., thematic analysis) and quantitative study (i.e., PLS-SEM). The qualitative research results indicate that relative advantage, incentive measures, government support, compatibility, and convenience are the “reasons for” users' CBDC adoption and recommend intentions, while tradition barrier, risk barrier, usage barrier, and image barrier are the “reasons against” users' CBDC adoption and recommend intentions. Further, the quantitative analysis of 638 pilot CBDC users suggests that users' CBDC adoption intentions positively influence their CBDC recommend intentions. “Reasons for” positively influence both users' attitudes and adoption intentions toward CBDC, whereas “reasons against” only negatively influence users' adoption intentions toward CBDC. Values (openness to change) positively influence users' “reasons for” and attitudes toward CBDC, and negatively influence users' “reasons against” adopting CBDC. Financial literacy strengthens the paths between “reasons for” and adoption intentions and weakens the paths between “reasons against” and adoption intentions. Theoretically, this study contributes by providing a thorough knowledge of users’ values, reasons, attitudes, and adoption and recommend intentions toward CBDC. Practically, this study renders insightful policy implications for central banks worldwide to promote CBDC applications.","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unveiling the influencing mechanism underlying users’ adoption and recommend intentions of central bank digital currency: A behavioral reasoning theory perspective\",\"authors\":\"Jiaqi Wu, Xin Liu, Chenghu Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the enormous benefits of the implementation of central bank digital currency (CBDC), the realization of these anticipated benefits depends on users' adoption and recommendations resulting from the consideration of both facilitators and inhibitors. Drawing on the behavioral reasoning theory (BRT), this study endeavors to unveil the influencing mechanism underlying users' CBDC adoption and recommend intentions using a hybrid approach integrating qualitative study (i.e., thematic analysis) and quantitative study (i.e., PLS-SEM). The qualitative research results indicate that relative advantage, incentive measures, government support, compatibility, and convenience are the “reasons for” users' CBDC adoption and recommend intentions, while tradition barrier, risk barrier, usage barrier, and image barrier are the “reasons against” users' CBDC adoption and recommend intentions. Further, the quantitative analysis of 638 pilot CBDC users suggests that users' CBDC adoption intentions positively influence their CBDC recommend intentions. “Reasons for” positively influence both users' attitudes and adoption intentions toward CBDC, whereas “reasons against” only negatively influence users' adoption intentions toward CBDC. Values (openness to change) positively influence users' “reasons for” and attitudes toward CBDC, and negatively influence users' “reasons against” adopting CBDC. Financial literacy strengthens the paths between “reasons for” and adoption intentions and weakens the paths between “reasons against” and adoption intentions. Theoretically, this study contributes by providing a thorough knowledge of users’ values, reasons, attitudes, and adoption and recommend intentions toward CBDC. Practically, this study renders insightful policy implications for central banks worldwide to promote CBDC applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104050\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104050","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管央行数字货币(CBDC)的实施会带来巨大的利益,但这些预期利益的实现取决于用户的采用和推荐,而用户的采用和推荐则同时考虑了促进因素和抑制因素。本研究借鉴行为推理理论(BRT),采用定性研究(即主题分析)和定量研究(即 PLS-SEM)相结合的混合方法,努力揭示用户采用 CBDC 和推荐意向的影响机制。定性研究结果表明,相对优势、激励措施、政府支持、兼容性和便利性是用户采用和推荐 CBDC 的 "原因",而传统障碍、风险障碍、使用障碍和形象障碍则是用户采用和推荐 CBDC 的 "反对原因"。此外,对 638 名 CBDC 试点用户的定量分析表明,用户的 CBDC 采用意愿会对其 CBDC 推荐意愿产生积极影响。"支持的原因 "对用户采用 CBDC 的态度和意向都有积极影响,而 "反对的原因 "只对用户采用 CBDC 的意向有消极影响。价值观(对变化的开放性)对用户采用 CBDC 的 "原因 "和态度有积极影响,而对用户采用 CBDC 的 "反对原因 "有消极影响。金融知识加强了 "支持原因 "与采用意愿之间的路径,削弱了 "反对原因 "与采用意愿之间的路径。从理论上讲,本研究有助于全面了解用户对 CBDC 的价值观、原因、态度、采用意向和推荐意向。在实践中,本研究为全球中央银行推广 CBDC 应用提供了深刻的政策启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unveiling the influencing mechanism underlying users’ adoption and recommend intentions of central bank digital currency: A behavioral reasoning theory perspective
Despite the enormous benefits of the implementation of central bank digital currency (CBDC), the realization of these anticipated benefits depends on users' adoption and recommendations resulting from the consideration of both facilitators and inhibitors. Drawing on the behavioral reasoning theory (BRT), this study endeavors to unveil the influencing mechanism underlying users' CBDC adoption and recommend intentions using a hybrid approach integrating qualitative study (i.e., thematic analysis) and quantitative study (i.e., PLS-SEM). The qualitative research results indicate that relative advantage, incentive measures, government support, compatibility, and convenience are the “reasons for” users' CBDC adoption and recommend intentions, while tradition barrier, risk barrier, usage barrier, and image barrier are the “reasons against” users' CBDC adoption and recommend intentions. Further, the quantitative analysis of 638 pilot CBDC users suggests that users' CBDC adoption intentions positively influence their CBDC recommend intentions. “Reasons for” positively influence both users' attitudes and adoption intentions toward CBDC, whereas “reasons against” only negatively influence users' adoption intentions toward CBDC. Values (openness to change) positively influence users' “reasons for” and attitudes toward CBDC, and negatively influence users' “reasons against” adopting CBDC. Financial literacy strengthens the paths between “reasons for” and adoption intentions and weakens the paths between “reasons against” and adoption intentions. Theoretically, this study contributes by providing a thorough knowledge of users’ values, reasons, attitudes, and adoption and recommend intentions toward CBDC. Practically, this study renders insightful policy implications for central banks worldwide to promote CBDC applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
14.40%
发文量
340
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services is a prominent publication that serves as a platform for international and interdisciplinary research and discussions in the constantly evolving fields of retailing and services studies. With a specific emphasis on consumer behavior and policy and managerial decisions, the journal aims to foster contributions from academics encompassing diverse disciplines. The primary areas covered by the journal are: Retailing and the sale of goods The provision of consumer services, including transportation, tourism, and leisure.
期刊最新文献
Customers’ reuse intention to autonomous delivery vehicles in terminal delivery service: A valence theory perspective We match! Building online brand engagement behaviours through emotional and rational processes From popularity to pitfalls: Diagnosing consumer issues and engineering solutions for an ink-inspired mobile theme system Retail consumers' conundrum: An in-depth qualitative study navigating the motivations and aversion of chatbots Bright and dark sides of green consumerism: An in-depth qualitative investigation in retailing context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1