R Kathryn McHugh,Megan D McCarthy,Juliette A Bichon,Minh Dung Nguyen,Elizabeth K Kneeland,Robyn A Ellis,Daniel G Dillon,Garrett M Fitzmaurice
{"title":"行为干预对药物使用障碍成人压力反应的影响。","authors":"R Kathryn McHugh,Megan D McCarthy,Juliette A Bichon,Minh Dung Nguyen,Elizabeth K Kneeland,Robyn A Ellis,Daniel G Dillon,Garrett M Fitzmaurice","doi":"10.1037/adb0001032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nHeightened reactivity to stress is associated with poor treatment outcome in people with substance use disorders (SUDs). Behavioral strategies can reduce stress reactivity; however, these strategies are understudied in people with SUDs. The objective of this study was to test the effect of two behavioral strategies (cognitive reappraisal and affect labeling) on stress reactivity in people with SUDs.\r\n\r\nMETHOD\r\nTreatment-seeking adults with SUDs (N = 119) were randomized to receive brief training in cognitive reappraisal, affect labeling, or a psychoeducational control, followed by a standardized stress induction. Markers of stress reactivity were collected before and following stress induction and included self-reported negative affect and substance craving, as well as salivary cortisol, and skin conductance response.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAnalyses of covariance did not indicate a significant effect of treatment condition on negative affect, cortisol, or skin conductance response. Participants in the affect labeling condition had greater increase in craving than those in the cognitive reappraisal condition; neither condition differed from control.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nResults indicated that, although participants were able to implement behavioral skills following a brief training, training condition did not modify stress reactivity, on average, relative to control. Future directions include consideration of individual differences in response to training and determination of whether higher \"dosing\" of skills via multiple sessions or extended practice is needed to influence stress reactivity in people with SUDs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":48325,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Addictive Behaviors","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of behavioral interventions on stress reactivity in adults with substance use disorders.\",\"authors\":\"R Kathryn McHugh,Megan D McCarthy,Juliette A Bichon,Minh Dung Nguyen,Elizabeth K Kneeland,Robyn A Ellis,Daniel G Dillon,Garrett M Fitzmaurice\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/adb0001032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\r\\nHeightened reactivity to stress is associated with poor treatment outcome in people with substance use disorders (SUDs). Behavioral strategies can reduce stress reactivity; however, these strategies are understudied in people with SUDs. The objective of this study was to test the effect of two behavioral strategies (cognitive reappraisal and affect labeling) on stress reactivity in people with SUDs.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHOD\\r\\nTreatment-seeking adults with SUDs (N = 119) were randomized to receive brief training in cognitive reappraisal, affect labeling, or a psychoeducational control, followed by a standardized stress induction. Markers of stress reactivity were collected before and following stress induction and included self-reported negative affect and substance craving, as well as salivary cortisol, and skin conductance response.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nAnalyses of covariance did not indicate a significant effect of treatment condition on negative affect, cortisol, or skin conductance response. Participants in the affect labeling condition had greater increase in craving than those in the cognitive reappraisal condition; neither condition differed from control.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nResults indicated that, although participants were able to implement behavioral skills following a brief training, training condition did not modify stress reactivity, on average, relative to control. Future directions include consideration of individual differences in response to training and determination of whether higher \\\"dosing\\\" of skills via multiple sessions or extended practice is needed to influence stress reactivity in people with SUDs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).\",\"PeriodicalId\":48325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology of Addictive Behaviors\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology of Addictive Behaviors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0001032\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Addictive Behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0001032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的压力反应性增高与药物使用障碍(SUDs)患者治疗效果不佳有关。行为策略可以降低压力反应性;然而,这些策略在药物滥用障碍患者中的应用还不充分。本研究的目的是测试两种行为策略(认知重评和情感标签)对药物滥用失调症患者压力反应性的影响。方法将寻求治疗的成年药物滥用失调症患者(119 人)随机分组,接受认知重评、情感标签或心理教育对照组的简短培训,然后进行标准化压力诱导。结果协方差分析表明,治疗条件对负性情绪、皮质醇或皮肤传导反应没有显著影响。结果表明,虽然参与者在短暂的训练后能够实施行为技能,但与对照组相比,训练条件并没有平均改变压力反应性。未来的研究方向包括考虑个体对训练的反应差异,以及确定是否需要通过多次训练或长时间练习来增加技能的 "剂量",以影响 SUD 患者的压力反应性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
Effects of behavioral interventions on stress reactivity in adults with substance use disorders.
OBJECTIVE
Heightened reactivity to stress is associated with poor treatment outcome in people with substance use disorders (SUDs). Behavioral strategies can reduce stress reactivity; however, these strategies are understudied in people with SUDs. The objective of this study was to test the effect of two behavioral strategies (cognitive reappraisal and affect labeling) on stress reactivity in people with SUDs.
METHOD
Treatment-seeking adults with SUDs (N = 119) were randomized to receive brief training in cognitive reappraisal, affect labeling, or a psychoeducational control, followed by a standardized stress induction. Markers of stress reactivity were collected before and following stress induction and included self-reported negative affect and substance craving, as well as salivary cortisol, and skin conductance response.
RESULTS
Analyses of covariance did not indicate a significant effect of treatment condition on negative affect, cortisol, or skin conductance response. Participants in the affect labeling condition had greater increase in craving than those in the cognitive reappraisal condition; neither condition differed from control.
CONCLUSIONS
Results indicated that, although participants were able to implement behavioral skills following a brief training, training condition did not modify stress reactivity, on average, relative to control. Future directions include consideration of individual differences in response to training and determination of whether higher "dosing" of skills via multiple sessions or extended practice is needed to influence stress reactivity in people with SUDs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Psychology of Addictive Behaviors publishes peer-reviewed original articles related to the psychological aspects of addictive behaviors. The journal includes articles on the following topics: - alcohol and alcoholism - drug use and abuse - eating disorders - smoking and nicotine addiction, and other excessive behaviors (e.g., gambling) Full-length research reports, literature reviews, brief reports, and comments are published.