通过人工智能探索量子概率解释

Jinjun Zeng, Xiao Zhang
{"title":"通过人工智能探索量子概率解释","authors":"Jinjun Zeng, Xiao Zhang","doi":"arxiv-2409.04690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The varying interpretations of quantum probability governing quantum\nmeasurements are significantly reflected in divergent opinions on the\nfoundations of statistics, including ensemble-frequency theory, propensity\ntheory, and subjective degrees of reasonable belief. Although it has been\nsuggested that a series of progressively sophisticated tests using artificial\nintelligence could yield increasingly significant experimental data to\nconstrain potential resolutions to the measurement problem, no feasible\nexperimental designs have yet been proposed. In this work, we utilize advanced\ndeep learning technology to develop a novel experimental framework that\nintegrates neural network-based artificial intelligence into a Bell test. This\nframework challenges the implicit assumptions underlying Bell tests. We\ndemonstrate our framework through a simulation and introduce three new\nmetric-morphing polygons, averaged Shannon entropy, and probability density\nmap-to analyze the results. This approach enables us to determine whether\nquantum probability aligns with any one of these three interpretations or a\nhybrid of them.","PeriodicalId":501190,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - General Physics","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring quantum probability interpretations through artificial intelligence\",\"authors\":\"Jinjun Zeng, Xiao Zhang\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.04690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The varying interpretations of quantum probability governing quantum\\nmeasurements are significantly reflected in divergent opinions on the\\nfoundations of statistics, including ensemble-frequency theory, propensity\\ntheory, and subjective degrees of reasonable belief. Although it has been\\nsuggested that a series of progressively sophisticated tests using artificial\\nintelligence could yield increasingly significant experimental data to\\nconstrain potential resolutions to the measurement problem, no feasible\\nexperimental designs have yet been proposed. In this work, we utilize advanced\\ndeep learning technology to develop a novel experimental framework that\\nintegrates neural network-based artificial intelligence into a Bell test. This\\nframework challenges the implicit assumptions underlying Bell tests. We\\ndemonstrate our framework through a simulation and introduce three new\\nmetric-morphing polygons, averaged Shannon entropy, and probability density\\nmap-to analyze the results. This approach enables us to determine whether\\nquantum probability aligns with any one of these three interpretations or a\\nhybrid of them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - General Physics\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - General Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.04690\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - General Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.04690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于量子测量的量子概率的不同解释,在统计学基础上的不同观点中得到了显著反映,包括集合频率理论、倾向理论和主观合理信念度。虽然有人建议,利用人工智能进行一系列逐步复杂的测试,可以获得越来越多的重要实验数据,从而约束测量问题的潜在解决方案,但目前还没有提出可行的实验设计。在这项工作中,我们利用先进的深度学习技术开发了一个新颖的实验框架,将基于神经网络的人工智能整合到贝尔测试中。这一框架对贝尔测试的隐含假设提出了挑战。我们通过模拟演示了我们的框架,并引入了三个新指标--变形多边形、平均香农熵和概率密度图来分析结果。这种方法使我们能够确定量子概率是否符合这三种解释中的任何一种或它们的混合解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring quantum probability interpretations through artificial intelligence
The varying interpretations of quantum probability governing quantum measurements are significantly reflected in divergent opinions on the foundations of statistics, including ensemble-frequency theory, propensity theory, and subjective degrees of reasonable belief. Although it has been suggested that a series of progressively sophisticated tests using artificial intelligence could yield increasingly significant experimental data to constrain potential resolutions to the measurement problem, no feasible experimental designs have yet been proposed. In this work, we utilize advanced deep learning technology to develop a novel experimental framework that integrates neural network-based artificial intelligence into a Bell test. This framework challenges the implicit assumptions underlying Bell tests. We demonstrate our framework through a simulation and introduce three new metric-morphing polygons, averaged Shannon entropy, and probability density map-to analyze the results. This approach enables us to determine whether quantum probability aligns with any one of these three interpretations or a hybrid of them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring quantum probability interpretations through artificial intelligence Can the effect of an external gravitational field be incorporated in the classical kinetic theory of gases? Optimization of Postselection in Quantum Algorithms: A Two-Way Quantum Computing Approach Causality in the maximally extended Reissner--Nordström spacetime with identifications Mass and angular momentum for the Kerr black hole in TEGR and STEGR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1