杀虫剂施用频率超过阈值导致传粉昆虫来访减少,从而降低了作物产量

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY Ecological Entomology Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1111/een.13375
Manobrata Das, Ayan Paul, Sabyasachi Bhattacharya, Parthiba Basu
{"title":"杀虫剂施用频率超过阈值导致传粉昆虫来访减少,从而降低了作物产量","authors":"Manobrata Das, Ayan Paul, Sabyasachi Bhattacharya, Parthiba Basu","doi":"10.1111/een.13375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<jats:list> <jats:list-item>The deleterious effects of pesticides on pollinating insect abundance are well established but the relationship among pesticide application, pollinator decline and the corresponding change in marketable yield is not fully understood.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>In this study, we assessed what level of pesticide exposure causes maximum pollinator loss and at that level of pollinator loss if there is any crop yield loss.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>We primarily assessed pollinator crop flower visitation in 27 aubergine farms with different degrees of pesticide application. Subsequently, we also observed pollinator activity and aubergine yield (fruit set) in a semi‐controlled field experiment with four different pesticide treatments.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Pesticide application frequency was the most important driver of pollinator visitation compared with quantity. Pesticide spray above once a week caused a drastic drop in pollinator visitation in a non‐linear fashion showing a threshold of pesticide application.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>In high pesticide frequency experimental plots, pollinator visitation was significantly lower than in control, low and medium frequency plots. This resulted in lowering of aubergine fruit set by 27.4% in high pesticide frequency plots. Use of synthetic pesticides to safeguard yield seems to be doing just the opposite by bringing down yield from pesticide‐induced pollinator limitation.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":50557,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Entomology","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pollinator visitation decline due to pesticide application beyond threshold frequency brings down crop yield\",\"authors\":\"Manobrata Das, Ayan Paul, Sabyasachi Bhattacharya, Parthiba Basu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/een.13375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<jats:list> <jats:list-item>The deleterious effects of pesticides on pollinating insect abundance are well established but the relationship among pesticide application, pollinator decline and the corresponding change in marketable yield is not fully understood.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>In this study, we assessed what level of pesticide exposure causes maximum pollinator loss and at that level of pollinator loss if there is any crop yield loss.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>We primarily assessed pollinator crop flower visitation in 27 aubergine farms with different degrees of pesticide application. Subsequently, we also observed pollinator activity and aubergine yield (fruit set) in a semi‐controlled field experiment with four different pesticide treatments.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Pesticide application frequency was the most important driver of pollinator visitation compared with quantity. Pesticide spray above once a week caused a drastic drop in pollinator visitation in a non‐linear fashion showing a threshold of pesticide application.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>In high pesticide frequency experimental plots, pollinator visitation was significantly lower than in control, low and medium frequency plots. This resulted in lowering of aubergine fruit set by 27.4% in high pesticide frequency plots. Use of synthetic pesticides to safeguard yield seems to be doing just the opposite by bringing down yield from pesticide‐induced pollinator limitation.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Entomology\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Entomology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/een.13375\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/een.13375","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农药对授粉昆虫数量的有害影响已得到充分证实,但农药施用、授粉昆虫减少和相应的可销售产量变化之间的关系还没有得到充分了解。在这项研究中,我们评估了农药暴露的程度会导致授粉昆虫的最大损失,以及在这一程度上的授粉昆虫损失是否会导致作物减产。我们主要评估了 27 个不同农药施用量的茄子农场中授粉昆虫对作物花朵的光顾情况。随后,我们还在一个采用四种不同农药处理的半对照田间试验中观察了授粉昆虫的活动和茄子产量(坐果率)。与数量相比,农药施用频率是授粉昆虫造访的最重要驱动因素。每周喷洒一次以上的农药会导致传粉昆虫来访量急剧下降,这种非线性方式显示了农药施用的阈值。在喷洒农药频率较高的实验地块,传粉昆虫的到访量明显低于对照地块、低频地块和中频地块。这导致高农药频率地块的茄子坐果率降低了 27.4%。使用合成杀虫剂来保障产量似乎适得其反,因为杀虫剂导致授粉昆虫受限,从而降低了产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pollinator visitation decline due to pesticide application beyond threshold frequency brings down crop yield
The deleterious effects of pesticides on pollinating insect abundance are well established but the relationship among pesticide application, pollinator decline and the corresponding change in marketable yield is not fully understood. In this study, we assessed what level of pesticide exposure causes maximum pollinator loss and at that level of pollinator loss if there is any crop yield loss. We primarily assessed pollinator crop flower visitation in 27 aubergine farms with different degrees of pesticide application. Subsequently, we also observed pollinator activity and aubergine yield (fruit set) in a semi‐controlled field experiment with four different pesticide treatments. Pesticide application frequency was the most important driver of pollinator visitation compared with quantity. Pesticide spray above once a week caused a drastic drop in pollinator visitation in a non‐linear fashion showing a threshold of pesticide application. In high pesticide frequency experimental plots, pollinator visitation was significantly lower than in control, low and medium frequency plots. This resulted in lowering of aubergine fruit set by 27.4% in high pesticide frequency plots. Use of synthetic pesticides to safeguard yield seems to be doing just the opposite by bringing down yield from pesticide‐induced pollinator limitation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Entomology
Ecological Entomology 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
94
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Entomology publishes top-quality original research on the ecology of insects and related invertebrate taxa. Our aim is to publish papers that will be of considerable interest to the wide community of ecologists who are motivated by ecological or evolutionary theory. The suitability of a manuscript will usually be assessed within 5 days. We publish full-length Original Articles as well as Reviews, Short Communications, Methods and Natural History papers. In Original Articles, we greatly prefer papers that test specific hypotheses and which have a high degree of novelty. All categories aim for innovative contributions that advance the subject of ecological entomology.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information To pool or not to pool: Pooled metabarcoding does not affect estimates of prey diversity in spider gut content analysis What determines the antipredator strategy in antlion larvae? Burrowing ability decreases the duration of post‐contact immobility Suspended resting of caterpillars as an anti‐predator strategy Fire ants mediate competition between scale insects and fruit flies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1