植物与节肢动物相互作用过程中环境 DNA 的沉积量取决于分类群、丰度和相互作用时间

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY Ecological Entomology Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1111/een.13372
Sarah Friedrich, Mattia De Vivo, Christian Ulrich Baden, Michael E. Grevé, Christian Maus, Thomas Udelhoven, Henrik Krehenwinkel
{"title":"植物与节肢动物相互作用过程中环境 DNA 的沉积量取决于分类群、丰度和相互作用时间","authors":"Sarah Friedrich, Mattia De Vivo, Christian Ulrich Baden, Michael E. Grevé, Christian Maus, Thomas Udelhoven, Henrik Krehenwinkel","doi":"10.1111/een.13372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<jats:list> <jats:list-item>Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding holds great promise as a simple and efficient tool to detect plant–insect interactions. However, the influence of both abiotic and biotic factors on eDNA deposition in these interactions is not well understood. It especially remains to be tested how much eDNA abundances reflect the frequency or intensity of interactions between insects and plants.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>We experimentally analysed the quantitative deposition of eDNA from three insect species (the southern green stink bug <jats:italic>Nezara viridula,</jats:italic> the mustard beetle <jats:italic>Phaedon cochleariae</jats:italic> and the fall armyworm <jats:italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</jats:italic>) on leaves of two host plants of varying attractiveness: savoy cabbage (<jats:italic>Brassica oleracea</jats:italic> var. <jats:italic>sabauda</jats:italic>, preferred host) and tomato (<jats:italic>Solanum lycopersicum</jats:italic>, less preferred host). We tested for the effects of insect taxonomy, host plant, exposure time and abundances of interacting insects on the plant material.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Our data show a clear quantitative ecological signal in eDNA deposition. Insect abundance and interaction time are reflected in the amount of deposited eDNA. Moreover, significantly more eDNA was deposited on cabbage, the preferred host plant. Besides these ecological drivers, a very strong taxonomic eDNA deposition bias between different insect taxa was observed.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>eDNA detection is strongly influenced by the ecological interactions of the targeted taxa, highlighting the utility of the tool to specifically detect trophic interactions between plants and arthropods. However, taxonomic biases in eDNA deposition preclude comparative analyses of interactions at the community level.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":50557,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Entomology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The quantity of deposited environmental DNA in plant–arthropod interactions depends on taxon, abundance and interaction time\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Friedrich, Mattia De Vivo, Christian Ulrich Baden, Michael E. Grevé, Christian Maus, Thomas Udelhoven, Henrik Krehenwinkel\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/een.13372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<jats:list> <jats:list-item>Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding holds great promise as a simple and efficient tool to detect plant–insect interactions. However, the influence of both abiotic and biotic factors on eDNA deposition in these interactions is not well understood. It especially remains to be tested how much eDNA abundances reflect the frequency or intensity of interactions between insects and plants.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>We experimentally analysed the quantitative deposition of eDNA from three insect species (the southern green stink bug <jats:italic>Nezara viridula,</jats:italic> the mustard beetle <jats:italic>Phaedon cochleariae</jats:italic> and the fall armyworm <jats:italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</jats:italic>) on leaves of two host plants of varying attractiveness: savoy cabbage (<jats:italic>Brassica oleracea</jats:italic> var. <jats:italic>sabauda</jats:italic>, preferred host) and tomato (<jats:italic>Solanum lycopersicum</jats:italic>, less preferred host). We tested for the effects of insect taxonomy, host plant, exposure time and abundances of interacting insects on the plant material.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Our data show a clear quantitative ecological signal in eDNA deposition. Insect abundance and interaction time are reflected in the amount of deposited eDNA. Moreover, significantly more eDNA was deposited on cabbage, the preferred host plant. Besides these ecological drivers, a very strong taxonomic eDNA deposition bias between different insect taxa was observed.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>eDNA detection is strongly influenced by the ecological interactions of the targeted taxa, highlighting the utility of the tool to specifically detect trophic interactions between plants and arthropods. However, taxonomic biases in eDNA deposition preclude comparative analyses of interactions at the community level.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Entomology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Entomology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/een.13372\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/een.13372","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境 DNA(eDNA)代谢编码作为一种检测植物-昆虫相互作用的简单而有效的工具,前景十分广阔。然而,非生物因素和生物因素对这些相互作用中 eDNA 沉积的影响尚不十分清楚。特别是 eDNA 丰度在多大程度上反映了昆虫与植物之间相互作用的频率或强度,还有待检验。我们通过实验分析了三种昆虫(南方绿蝽 Nezara viridula、芥子甲 Phaedon cochleariae 和秋军虫 Spodoptera frugiperda)的 eDNA 在两种具有不同吸引力的寄主植物叶片上的定量沉积情况:大白菜(Brassica oleracea var. sabauda,首选寄主)和番茄(Solanum lycopersicum,次选寄主)。我们测试了昆虫分类、寄主植物、暴露时间和植物材料上相互作用昆虫数量的影响。我们的数据显示,在 eDNA 沉积过程中存在明显的定量生态信号。昆虫丰度和相互作用时间反映在沉积的 eDNA 数量上。此外,沉积在卷心菜(首选寄主植物)上的 eDNA 明显更多。除了这些生态驱动因素外,还观察到不同昆虫类群之间存在非常强烈的分类学 eDNA 沉积偏差。eDNA 检测受到目标类群生态相互作用的强烈影响,这突出表明该工具可用于专门检测植物与节肢动物之间的营养相互作用。然而,eDNA沉积中的分类偏差排除了对群落层面相互作用的比较分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The quantity of deposited environmental DNA in plant–arthropod interactions depends on taxon, abundance and interaction time
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding holds great promise as a simple and efficient tool to detect plant–insect interactions. However, the influence of both abiotic and biotic factors on eDNA deposition in these interactions is not well understood. It especially remains to be tested how much eDNA abundances reflect the frequency or intensity of interactions between insects and plants. We experimentally analysed the quantitative deposition of eDNA from three insect species (the southern green stink bug Nezara viridula, the mustard beetle Phaedon cochleariae and the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda) on leaves of two host plants of varying attractiveness: savoy cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. sabauda, preferred host) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum, less preferred host). We tested for the effects of insect taxonomy, host plant, exposure time and abundances of interacting insects on the plant material. Our data show a clear quantitative ecological signal in eDNA deposition. Insect abundance and interaction time are reflected in the amount of deposited eDNA. Moreover, significantly more eDNA was deposited on cabbage, the preferred host plant. Besides these ecological drivers, a very strong taxonomic eDNA deposition bias between different insect taxa was observed. eDNA detection is strongly influenced by the ecological interactions of the targeted taxa, highlighting the utility of the tool to specifically detect trophic interactions between plants and arthropods. However, taxonomic biases in eDNA deposition preclude comparative analyses of interactions at the community level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Entomology
Ecological Entomology 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
94
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Entomology publishes top-quality original research on the ecology of insects and related invertebrate taxa. Our aim is to publish papers that will be of considerable interest to the wide community of ecologists who are motivated by ecological or evolutionary theory. The suitability of a manuscript will usually be assessed within 5 days. We publish full-length Original Articles as well as Reviews, Short Communications, Methods and Natural History papers. In Original Articles, we greatly prefer papers that test specific hypotheses and which have a high degree of novelty. All categories aim for innovative contributions that advance the subject of ecological entomology.
期刊最新文献
What determines the antipredator strategy in antlion larvae? Burrowing ability decreases the duration of post‐contact immobility Suspended resting of caterpillars as an anti‐predator strategy Fire ants mediate competition between scale insects and fruit flies High plasticity in diapause responses benefits bark beetles in a changing climate The refuse dump provides information that influences the foraging preferences of leaf‐cutting ants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1