与澳大利亚 COVID-19 大流行相关的肉牛贸易和流动的地区差异

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Animal Production Science Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1071/an23402
Joshua Aboah, Peggy Schrobback, Stephen McFallan, Dianne Mayberry
{"title":"与澳大利亚 COVID-19 大流行相关的肉牛贸易和流动的地区差异","authors":"Joshua Aboah, Peggy Schrobback, Stephen McFallan, Dianne Mayberry","doi":"10.1071/an23402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong> Context</strong><p>The COVID-19 pandemic caused mandated restrictions on movements and distancing of people with implications for meat supply chains. Despite the COVID restrictions, agricultural activities were permitted to continue as essential services in Australia. However, there were reported shortages of meat on the shelves of supermarkets and a general increase in the price of meat in Australia during the COVID period. Hence, there is a need to establish whether the restrictions affected upstream activities in Australia’s beef supply chain.</p><strong> Aim</strong><p>This study aims to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and confounding factors including rainfall and export bans on beef cattle trade and movement in Australia.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>Using annual data on beef cattle sold, purchased, transferred off-farm and transferred onto farms sourced from the database of the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences, a <i>t</i>-test analysis was conducted to establish the significant changes in cattle movement and trade for the pre-COVID (2014–2019) and COVID (2020–2022) periods. Additionally, a flexible least squares model augmented with a flexible generalised least squares model was used to assess the impact of confounding factors on cattle trade and movement.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>The results indicate no significant change in the proportion of beef cattle sold nationwide. Tasmania, New South Wales, and Western Australia (WA) recorded significant changes (1.4% increase, 3.6% increase, and 3.8% decrease, respectively) in the proportion of beef cattle purchased. For WA, these changes were localised to changes that occurred in WA Central and Southern Wheat Belt and WA Southwest Coastal regions. Moreover, rainfall did not significantly impact cattle trade but did affect cattle movements. The export ban only significantly impacted beef cattle sold in Queensland.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>Overall, the findings suggest that most regions in Australia did not experience significant changes in farm-level decisions regarding beef cattle movement and trade during the COVID period. Instead, minor adjustments were made to address the demand changes.</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>The findings imply that adopted policies that facilitated the implementation of biosecurity bubbles and the movements of animal transport workers for breeding facilities and abattoirs during the COVID period were effective in normalising farm-level operations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7895,"journal":{"name":"Animal Production Science","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional differences in beef cattle trade and movements associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Aboah, Peggy Schrobback, Stephen McFallan, Dianne Mayberry\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/an23402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong> Context</strong><p>The COVID-19 pandemic caused mandated restrictions on movements and distancing of people with implications for meat supply chains. Despite the COVID restrictions, agricultural activities were permitted to continue as essential services in Australia. However, there were reported shortages of meat on the shelves of supermarkets and a general increase in the price of meat in Australia during the COVID period. Hence, there is a need to establish whether the restrictions affected upstream activities in Australia’s beef supply chain.</p><strong> Aim</strong><p>This study aims to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and confounding factors including rainfall and export bans on beef cattle trade and movement in Australia.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>Using annual data on beef cattle sold, purchased, transferred off-farm and transferred onto farms sourced from the database of the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences, a <i>t</i>-test analysis was conducted to establish the significant changes in cattle movement and trade for the pre-COVID (2014–2019) and COVID (2020–2022) periods. Additionally, a flexible least squares model augmented with a flexible generalised least squares model was used to assess the impact of confounding factors on cattle trade and movement.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>The results indicate no significant change in the proportion of beef cattle sold nationwide. Tasmania, New South Wales, and Western Australia (WA) recorded significant changes (1.4% increase, 3.6% increase, and 3.8% decrease, respectively) in the proportion of beef cattle purchased. For WA, these changes were localised to changes that occurred in WA Central and Southern Wheat Belt and WA Southwest Coastal regions. Moreover, rainfall did not significantly impact cattle trade but did affect cattle movements. The export ban only significantly impacted beef cattle sold in Queensland.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>Overall, the findings suggest that most regions in Australia did not experience significant changes in farm-level decisions regarding beef cattle movement and trade during the COVID period. Instead, minor adjustments were made to address the demand changes.</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>The findings imply that adopted policies that facilitated the implementation of biosecurity bubbles and the movements of animal transport workers for breeding facilities and abattoirs during the COVID period were effective in normalising farm-level operations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Production Science\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Production Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/an23402\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Production Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/an23402","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 COVID-19 大流行对人员流动和隔离造成了强制性限制,对肉类供应链产生了影响。尽管受到 COVID 的限制,澳大利亚仍允许农业活动作为基本服务继续进行。然而,据报道,在 COVID 期间,澳大利亚超市货架上的肉类出现短缺,肉类价格普遍上涨。因此,有必要确定这些限制措施是否影响了澳大利亚牛肉供应链的上游活动。目的本研究旨在探讨 COVID-19 大流行以及降雨和出口禁令等混杂因素对澳大利亚肉牛贸易和流动的影响。方法利用澳大利亚农业与资源经济科学局数据库中关于肉牛销售、购买、农场外转移和农场内转移的年度数据,通过 t 检验分析确定 COVID 前(2014-2019 年)和 COVID 期间(2020-2022 年)肉牛移动和贸易的显著变化。此外,还使用了一个灵活的最小二乘法模型和一个灵活的广义最小二乘法模型来评估混杂因素对牛的贸易和流动的影响。主要结果结果表明,全国范围内销售的肉牛比例没有发生重大变化。塔斯马尼亚州、新南威尔士州和西澳大利亚州(WA)的肉牛购买比例出现了显著变化(分别增加 1.4%、增加 3.6% 和减少 3.8%)。就西澳大利亚而言,这些变化主要发生在西澳大利亚中部和南部小麦带以及西澳大利亚西南沿海地区。此外,降雨并没有对牛的交易产生重大影响,但却影响了牛的流动。出口禁令只对昆士兰州出售的肉牛产生了重大影响。结论总体而言,研究结果表明,在 COVID 期间,澳大利亚大多数地区农场一级的肉牛移动和贸易决策并未发生重大变化。相反,为了应对需求变化,这些地区做出了微小的调整。影响研究结果表明,在 COVID 期间,为促进生物安全泡沫的实施以及养殖设施和屠宰场的动物运输工人的流动而采取的政策有效地使农场层面的运营正常化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Regional differences in beef cattle trade and movements associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia
Context

The COVID-19 pandemic caused mandated restrictions on movements and distancing of people with implications for meat supply chains. Despite the COVID restrictions, agricultural activities were permitted to continue as essential services in Australia. However, there were reported shortages of meat on the shelves of supermarkets and a general increase in the price of meat in Australia during the COVID period. Hence, there is a need to establish whether the restrictions affected upstream activities in Australia’s beef supply chain.

Aim

This study aims to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and confounding factors including rainfall and export bans on beef cattle trade and movement in Australia.

Methods

Using annual data on beef cattle sold, purchased, transferred off-farm and transferred onto farms sourced from the database of the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences, a t-test analysis was conducted to establish the significant changes in cattle movement and trade for the pre-COVID (2014–2019) and COVID (2020–2022) periods. Additionally, a flexible least squares model augmented with a flexible generalised least squares model was used to assess the impact of confounding factors on cattle trade and movement.

Key results

The results indicate no significant change in the proportion of beef cattle sold nationwide. Tasmania, New South Wales, and Western Australia (WA) recorded significant changes (1.4% increase, 3.6% increase, and 3.8% decrease, respectively) in the proportion of beef cattle purchased. For WA, these changes were localised to changes that occurred in WA Central and Southern Wheat Belt and WA Southwest Coastal regions. Moreover, rainfall did not significantly impact cattle trade but did affect cattle movements. The export ban only significantly impacted beef cattle sold in Queensland.

Conclusions

Overall, the findings suggest that most regions in Australia did not experience significant changes in farm-level decisions regarding beef cattle movement and trade during the COVID period. Instead, minor adjustments were made to address the demand changes.

Implications

The findings imply that adopted policies that facilitated the implementation of biosecurity bubbles and the movements of animal transport workers for breeding facilities and abattoirs during the COVID period were effective in normalising farm-level operations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Production Science
Animal Production Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Research papers in Animal Production Science focus on improving livestock and food production, and on the social and economic issues that influence primary producers. The journal (formerly known as Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture) is predominantly concerned with domesticated animals (beef cattle, dairy cows, sheep, pigs, goats and poultry); however, contributions on horses and wild animals may be published where relevant. Animal Production Science is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science.
期刊最新文献
Prediction of the apparent ileal digestible amino acid contents of canola meal for broilers from crude protein content Undegradable dietary protein limits growth and carcass yields in crossbred Boer kids fed Desmanthus hay or Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana) hay supplemented with urea and/or cottonseed meal Regional differences in beef cattle trade and movements associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia Probiotics effects on the growth performance and meat quality of broiler chickens Growth performance and meat quality of finishing pigs fed diets supplemented with antioxidants and organic acids in late summer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1