学生是商业教育生态系统中的价值共同创造者

IF 2.8 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Marketing Education Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1177/02734753241267762
Maria Petrescu, John T. Gironda, Anjala S. Krishen, Adina Dudau, J.Ricky Fergurson, Steven A. Stewart, Philip Kitchen, Monica Fine
{"title":"学生是商业教育生态系统中的价值共同创造者","authors":"Maria Petrescu, John T. Gironda, Anjala S. Krishen, Adina Dudau, J.Ricky Fergurson, Steven A. Stewart, Philip Kitchen, Monica Fine","doi":"10.1177/02734753241267762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Departing from the dyadic paradigm of students versus business schools in marketing and business education, this article utilizes a pluralistic perspective to account for and investigate various stakeholder groups’ value expectations and roles as we develop and examine a value co-creation ecosystem framework for marketing and business education. Service-Dominant Logic and Authority Theory are used as theoretical lenses along with a mixed-method approach to conduct three studies: (a) a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), (b) a qualitative conceptual mapping content analysis, and (c) a three-round quantitative Delphi study. The results provide insights into the differing elements of value and level of authority expected by various stakeholders in marketing education. This research significantly contributes to the pluralist perspective, gaining ground in business education research by extending previous work. In addition, the article contributes to the Service-Dominant Logic and Authority Theory literature by integrating the two to improve the explanatory power of value co-creation ecosystems to an expertise-led service such as marketing education. Theoretically, integrating Service-Dominant Logic and Authority Theory generates fruitful avenues to uncover what matters to business school education stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":46987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Students as Value Co-Creators in the Business Education Ecosystem\",\"authors\":\"Maria Petrescu, John T. Gironda, Anjala S. Krishen, Adina Dudau, J.Ricky Fergurson, Steven A. Stewart, Philip Kitchen, Monica Fine\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02734753241267762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Departing from the dyadic paradigm of students versus business schools in marketing and business education, this article utilizes a pluralistic perspective to account for and investigate various stakeholder groups’ value expectations and roles as we develop and examine a value co-creation ecosystem framework for marketing and business education. Service-Dominant Logic and Authority Theory are used as theoretical lenses along with a mixed-method approach to conduct three studies: (a) a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), (b) a qualitative conceptual mapping content analysis, and (c) a three-round quantitative Delphi study. The results provide insights into the differing elements of value and level of authority expected by various stakeholders in marketing education. This research significantly contributes to the pluralist perspective, gaining ground in business education research by extending previous work. In addition, the article contributes to the Service-Dominant Logic and Authority Theory literature by integrating the two to improve the explanatory power of value co-creation ecosystems to an expertise-led service such as marketing education. Theoretically, integrating Service-Dominant Logic and Authority Theory generates fruitful avenues to uncover what matters to business school education stakeholders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Marketing Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Marketing Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753241267762\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753241267762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从市场营销和商业教育中学生与商学院的二元对立范式出发,在开发和研究市场营销和商业教育的价值共创生态系统框架时,采用多元视角来解释和研究不同利益相关者群体的价值期望和角色。文章以服务主导逻辑(Service-Dominant Logic)和权威理论(Authority Theory)为理论视角,采用混合方法开展了三项研究:(a)模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA);(b)定性概念图内容分析;(c)三轮定量德尔菲研究。研究结果深入揭示了市场营销教育中各利益相关方所期望的不同价值要素和权威程度。这项研究极大地促进了多元化视角的发展,通过扩展以往的研究工作,在商业教育研究中占据了一席之地。此外,文章通过整合服务主导逻辑和权威理论,提高了价值共创生态系统对市场营销教育等专业知识主导型服务的解释力,为服务主导逻辑和权威理论文献做出了贡献。从理论上讲,将服务主导逻辑和权威理论结合起来,可为揭示商学院教育利益相关者的关注点提供富有成效的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Students as Value Co-Creators in the Business Education Ecosystem
Departing from the dyadic paradigm of students versus business schools in marketing and business education, this article utilizes a pluralistic perspective to account for and investigate various stakeholder groups’ value expectations and roles as we develop and examine a value co-creation ecosystem framework for marketing and business education. Service-Dominant Logic and Authority Theory are used as theoretical lenses along with a mixed-method approach to conduct three studies: (a) a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), (b) a qualitative conceptual mapping content analysis, and (c) a three-round quantitative Delphi study. The results provide insights into the differing elements of value and level of authority expected by various stakeholders in marketing education. This research significantly contributes to the pluralist perspective, gaining ground in business education research by extending previous work. In addition, the article contributes to the Service-Dominant Logic and Authority Theory literature by integrating the two to improve the explanatory power of value co-creation ecosystems to an expertise-led service such as marketing education. Theoretically, integrating Service-Dominant Logic and Authority Theory generates fruitful avenues to uncover what matters to business school education stakeholders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Marketing Education
Journal of Marketing Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The Journal of Marketing Education is the leading international scholarly journal devoted to contemporary issues in marketing education. Its mission is to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas, information, and experiences related to the process of educating students in marketing and its subfields. Its audience is largely composed of marketing faculty members at institutions of higher education where teaching is an integral component of their overall responsibilities. The main function of the Journal of Marketing Education is to publish articles focusing on the latest teaching/learning strategies and tactics in marketing education.
期刊最新文献
The Future of Marketing and Marketing Education Students as Value Co-Creators in the Business Education Ecosystem Transformative Marketing Education: Drivers, Outcomes, and Research Agenda Embedding the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Marketing Education The Importance of Brand Equity in the Business of Marketing Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1