杂交苋与玉米、豆类和大豆共生的竞争能力

IF 2.1 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1007/s41348-024-00985-z
Leonardo Brunetto, Leandro Galon, Antônio Marcos Loureiro da Silva, Caroline Müller, Daniel Cristian Cavaletti, Rafael Hoffman Wall, Victor Miguel Senhori, Gismael Francisco Perin
{"title":"杂交苋与玉米、豆类和大豆共生的竞争能力","authors":"Leonardo Brunetto, Leandro Galon, Antônio Marcos Loureiro da Silva, Caroline Müller, Daniel Cristian Cavaletti, Rafael Hoffman Wall, Victor Miguel Senhori, Gismael Francisco Perin","doi":"10.1007/s41348-024-00985-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to evaluate the competitive ability of various maize, bean, and soybean cultivars when coexisting with different densities of <i>Amaranthus hybridus</i>, using a replacement series experiment conducted in completely randomized blocks with four replicates. The competitors included four maize cultivars, four bean cultivars, and two soybean cultivars, all tested against <i>A. hybridus</i>. The replacement series consisted of relative crop-to-<i>A. hybridus</i> ratios of 100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75, and 0:100%, corresponding to 20:0, 15:5, 10:10, 5:15, and 0:20 plants per pot, respectively. Competitive ability was assessed using diagrams and relative competitiveness indices. Fifty days after plant emergence, the morphophysiological characteristics of the competing species were determined. Results indicate a negative impact on all species, with both the crop plants (maize, beans, and soybeans) and <i>A. hybridus</i> suffering due to competition for the same environmental resources. Interspecific competition was found to be more detrimental than intraspecific competition. Maize and bean cultivars showed greater competitive ability against <i>A. hybridus</i>, whereas soybeans were more adversely affected by the presence of the competitor.</p>","PeriodicalId":16838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competitive ability of Amaranthus hybridus in coexistence with maize, bean and soybean\",\"authors\":\"Leonardo Brunetto, Leandro Galon, Antônio Marcos Loureiro da Silva, Caroline Müller, Daniel Cristian Cavaletti, Rafael Hoffman Wall, Victor Miguel Senhori, Gismael Francisco Perin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41348-024-00985-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study aimed to evaluate the competitive ability of various maize, bean, and soybean cultivars when coexisting with different densities of <i>Amaranthus hybridus</i>, using a replacement series experiment conducted in completely randomized blocks with four replicates. The competitors included four maize cultivars, four bean cultivars, and two soybean cultivars, all tested against <i>A. hybridus</i>. The replacement series consisted of relative crop-to-<i>A. hybridus</i> ratios of 100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75, and 0:100%, corresponding to 20:0, 15:5, 10:10, 5:15, and 0:20 plants per pot, respectively. Competitive ability was assessed using diagrams and relative competitiveness indices. Fifty days after plant emergence, the morphophysiological characteristics of the competing species were determined. Results indicate a negative impact on all species, with both the crop plants (maize, beans, and soybeans) and <i>A. hybridus</i> suffering due to competition for the same environmental resources. Interspecific competition was found to be more detrimental than intraspecific competition. Maize and bean cultivars showed greater competitive ability against <i>A. hybridus</i>, whereas soybeans were more adversely affected by the presence of the competitor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-024-00985-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-024-00985-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估各种玉米、豆类和大豆栽培品种与不同密度的杂色苋共存时的竞争能力,采用完全随机区组进行四次重复的置换系列实验。竞争者包括 4 个玉米栽培品种、4 个豆类栽培品种和 2 个大豆栽培品种,所有品种都针对杂色苋进行了测试。替换系列中作物与杂交种的相对比例分别为 100:0、75:25、50:50、25:75 和 0:100%,相当于每盆植株的比例分别为 20:0、15:5、10:10、5:15 和 0:20。竞争能力用图表和相对竞争指数进行评估。植物出苗 50 天后,测定了竞争物种的形态生理特征。结果表明,由于对相同环境资源的竞争,作物植物(玉米、豆类和大豆)和杂交种都受到了负面影响。种间竞争比种内竞争更有害。玉米和豆类品种对杂交马铃薯的竞争能力更强,而大豆受到杂交马铃薯的不利影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Competitive ability of Amaranthus hybridus in coexistence with maize, bean and soybean

This study aimed to evaluate the competitive ability of various maize, bean, and soybean cultivars when coexisting with different densities of Amaranthus hybridus, using a replacement series experiment conducted in completely randomized blocks with four replicates. The competitors included four maize cultivars, four bean cultivars, and two soybean cultivars, all tested against A. hybridus. The replacement series consisted of relative crop-to-A. hybridus ratios of 100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75, and 0:100%, corresponding to 20:0, 15:5, 10:10, 5:15, and 0:20 plants per pot, respectively. Competitive ability was assessed using diagrams and relative competitiveness indices. Fifty days after plant emergence, the morphophysiological characteristics of the competing species were determined. Results indicate a negative impact on all species, with both the crop plants (maize, beans, and soybeans) and A. hybridus suffering due to competition for the same environmental resources. Interspecific competition was found to be more detrimental than intraspecific competition. Maize and bean cultivars showed greater competitive ability against A. hybridus, whereas soybeans were more adversely affected by the presence of the competitor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection
Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
124
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection (JPDP) is an international scientific journal that publishes original research articles, reviews, short communications, position and opinion papers dealing with applied scientific aspects of plant pathology, plant health, plant protection and findings on newly occurring diseases and pests. "Special Issues" on coherent themes often arising from International Conferences are offered.
期刊最新文献
Improved methodology for the efficient isolation of viable Meloidogyne incognita eggs Exploring the interaction between aminobutyric acid and epigenetics in modulating ash dieback response in european ash (Fraxinus excelsior) Recruitment and retention of predatory coccinellid beetle, Cheilomenes sexmaculata (Fab.) using synthetic semiochemicals Emerging strategies in plant virus disease control: insights from the 56th meeting of the DPG working group “Viruskrankheiten der Pflanzen” Identification of full-sibling families from natural single-tree ash progenies based on SSR markers and genome-wide SNPs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1