尽管有讨厌的人:多样性、公平和包容性倡议的巨大前景和进步

IF 6.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Organizational Behavior Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1002/job.2835
Christine L. Nittrouer, David Arena, Elisabeth R. Silver, Derek R. Avery, Mikki R. Hebl
{"title":"尽管有讨厌的人:多样性、公平和包容性倡议的巨大前景和进步","authors":"Christine L. Nittrouer, David Arena, Elisabeth R. Silver, Derek R. Avery, Mikki R. Hebl","doi":"10.1002/job.2835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SummaryIn the current paper, we discuss the positive impact of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in our workplaces, including the historical movements that led to their inception as well as the reactions that have resulted in forms of resistance and backlash. Although there may be risks inherent in engaging in social justice work within organizations, we summarize the large body of empirical work documenting the immense benefits of choosing to do so. We argue that the promise of DEI initiatives is evidenced in the research‐based findings demonstrating the effectiveness of those initiatives that have emerged over time (e.g., including both representation and inclusion focused initiatives). The progress made by several DEI initiatives that are still being fully explored is discussed, and we maintain their effectiveness within certain contexts provided the use of current empirical evidence. We conclude by suggesting the evolving science behind DEI initiatives is exactly what we would expect when responsibly employing the scientific method and, that by reviewing the data, it is clear that the long‐term benefits provided by DEI initiatives far outweigh any short‐term risks.","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":"73 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Despite the haters: The immense promise and progress of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives\",\"authors\":\"Christine L. Nittrouer, David Arena, Elisabeth R. Silver, Derek R. Avery, Mikki R. Hebl\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/job.2835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SummaryIn the current paper, we discuss the positive impact of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in our workplaces, including the historical movements that led to their inception as well as the reactions that have resulted in forms of resistance and backlash. Although there may be risks inherent in engaging in social justice work within organizations, we summarize the large body of empirical work documenting the immense benefits of choosing to do so. We argue that the promise of DEI initiatives is evidenced in the research‐based findings demonstrating the effectiveness of those initiatives that have emerged over time (e.g., including both representation and inclusion focused initiatives). The progress made by several DEI initiatives that are still being fully explored is discussed, and we maintain their effectiveness within certain contexts provided the use of current empirical evidence. We conclude by suggesting the evolving science behind DEI initiatives is exactly what we would expect when responsibly employing the scientific method and, that by reviewing the data, it is clear that the long‐term benefits provided by DEI initiatives far outweigh any short‐term risks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Organizational Behavior\",\"volume\":\"73 2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Organizational Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2835\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2835","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在本文中,我们讨论了多元化、公平和包容(DEI)举措对工作场所的积极影响,包括导致这些举措诞生的历史运动,以及导致各种形式的抵制和反弹的反应。尽管在组织内部开展社会正义工作可能存在固有风险,但我们总结了大量实证工作,这些工作记录了选择这样做的巨大好处。我们认为,随着时间的推移(例如,包括以代表性和包容性为重点的倡议),以研究为基础的发现证明了这些倡议的有效性,这也证明了 "发展型企业倡议 "的前景。我们讨论了几项仍在全面探索中的发展性教育倡议所取得的进展,并通过使用当前的经验证据,坚持认为它们在某些情况下是有效的。最后,我们认为,发展性教育倡议背后不断发展的科学正是我们在负责任地运用科学方法时所期望的,而且,通过对数据的审查,发展性教育倡议所带来的长期益处显然远远大于任何短期风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Despite the haters: The immense promise and progress of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives
SummaryIn the current paper, we discuss the positive impact of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in our workplaces, including the historical movements that led to their inception as well as the reactions that have resulted in forms of resistance and backlash. Although there may be risks inherent in engaging in social justice work within organizations, we summarize the large body of empirical work documenting the immense benefits of choosing to do so. We argue that the promise of DEI initiatives is evidenced in the research‐based findings demonstrating the effectiveness of those initiatives that have emerged over time (e.g., including both representation and inclusion focused initiatives). The progress made by several DEI initiatives that are still being fully explored is discussed, and we maintain their effectiveness within certain contexts provided the use of current empirical evidence. We conclude by suggesting the evolving science behind DEI initiatives is exactly what we would expect when responsibly employing the scientific method and, that by reviewing the data, it is clear that the long‐term benefits provided by DEI initiatives far outweigh any short‐term risks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: The Journal of Organizational Behavior aims to publish empirical reports and theoretical reviews of research in the field of organizational behavior, wherever in the world that work is conducted. The journal will focus on research and theory in all topics associated with organizational behavior within and across individual, group and organizational levels of analysis, including: -At the individual level: personality, perception, beliefs, attitudes, values, motivation, career behavior, stress, emotions, judgment, and commitment. -At the group level: size, composition, structure, leadership, power, group affect, and politics. -At the organizational level: structure, change, goal-setting, creativity, and human resource management policies and practices. -Across levels: decision-making, performance, job satisfaction, turnover and absenteeism, diversity, careers and career development, equal opportunities, work-life balance, identification, organizational culture and climate, inter-organizational processes, and multi-national and cross-national issues. -Research methodologies in studies of organizational behavior.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Getting away “Scott” (but not Susan) free: The effects of safety-specific abusive supervision and supervisor gender on follower attributions and safety outcomes How and when do frequent daily work interruptions contribute to or undermine daily job satisfaction? A stress appraisal perspective Algorithmic management in the gig economy: A systematic review and research integration To escape the pain: Paths to voluntary turnover, social pain, and influences on the selection of a new job role
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1