哪些保护区应优先用于预防和早期发现生物入侵?一种新的方法论

IF 2.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Biological Invasions Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1007/s10530-024-03423-1
Rafaela Guimarães Silva, Victor Vinícius F. de Lima, Pedro H. C. Pereira, Tainah Correa Seabra Guimarães, Alexandre Bonesso Sampaio, Rafael D. Zenni
{"title":"哪些保护区应优先用于预防和早期发现生物入侵?一种新的方法论","authors":"Rafaela Guimarães Silva, Victor Vinícius F. de Lima, Pedro H. C. Pereira, Tainah Correa Seabra Guimarães, Alexandre Bonesso Sampaio, Rafael D. Zenni","doi":"10.1007/s10530-024-03423-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Protected areas are key to global biodiversity conservation efforts. Yet, most protected areas globally face threats of biological invasions either by invasive non-native species established within the protected area or by the imminent establishment of invasive non-native species established in the surrounding landscapes. In face of growing biological invasions, protected area managers must be able to set prevention and control priorities for invasive non-native species management. In this study, we developed a new methodological approach to identify which protected areas should be prioritized for prevention and early detection and which should be prioritized for control of biological invasions. Our methodological approach analyzes the occurrence of invasive species within and around the protected areas and weights the influence of multiple existing pathways to calculate the probability of introduction of invasive species and colonization pressure for each protected area. We evaluated our priority setting model in 280 terrestrial and 42 marine protected areas in Brazil. For the terrestrial protected areas, 84 were classified as priority for prevention and early detection and 124 were classified as priority for control of biological invasions. For the marine protected areas, 25 were classified as priority for prevention and early detection and seven were classified as priority for control of biological invasions. Human population density and percentage of pasture cover surrounding the protected area were the most important factors for priority setting in terrestrial protected areas whereas number of aquiculture activities, density of waterways, distance to ports, distance to oil platforms, and distance from sinking points were the most important factors for priority setting in marine protected areas. In conclusion, the framework presented here provides an objective methodology for managers and stakeholders to decide where to invest their limited resources available for management of biological invasions in protected areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":9202,"journal":{"name":"Biological Invasions","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which protected areas should be prioritized for prevention and early detection of biological invasions? A new methodological approach\",\"authors\":\"Rafaela Guimarães Silva, Victor Vinícius F. de Lima, Pedro H. C. Pereira, Tainah Correa Seabra Guimarães, Alexandre Bonesso Sampaio, Rafael D. Zenni\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10530-024-03423-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Protected areas are key to global biodiversity conservation efforts. Yet, most protected areas globally face threats of biological invasions either by invasive non-native species established within the protected area or by the imminent establishment of invasive non-native species established in the surrounding landscapes. In face of growing biological invasions, protected area managers must be able to set prevention and control priorities for invasive non-native species management. In this study, we developed a new methodological approach to identify which protected areas should be prioritized for prevention and early detection and which should be prioritized for control of biological invasions. Our methodological approach analyzes the occurrence of invasive species within and around the protected areas and weights the influence of multiple existing pathways to calculate the probability of introduction of invasive species and colonization pressure for each protected area. We evaluated our priority setting model in 280 terrestrial and 42 marine protected areas in Brazil. For the terrestrial protected areas, 84 were classified as priority for prevention and early detection and 124 were classified as priority for control of biological invasions. For the marine protected areas, 25 were classified as priority for prevention and early detection and seven were classified as priority for control of biological invasions. Human population density and percentage of pasture cover surrounding the protected area were the most important factors for priority setting in terrestrial protected areas whereas number of aquiculture activities, density of waterways, distance to ports, distance to oil platforms, and distance from sinking points were the most important factors for priority setting in marine protected areas. In conclusion, the framework presented here provides an objective methodology for managers and stakeholders to decide where to invest their limited resources available for management of biological invasions in protected areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Invasions\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Invasions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-024-03423-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Invasions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-024-03423-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

保护区是全球生物多样性保护工作的关键。然而,全球大多数保护区都面临着生物入侵的威胁,要么是在保护区内建立的非本地入侵物种,要么是即将在周边地区建立的非本地入侵物种。面对日益严重的生物入侵,保护区管理者必须能够确定非外来物种入侵管理的预防和控制重点。在这项研究中,我们开发了一种新的方法论,以确定哪些保护区应优先预防和早期发现生物入侵,哪些保护区应优先控制生物入侵。我们的方法分析了保护区内及周边入侵物种的发生情况,并对多种现有途径的影响进行加权,从而计算出每个保护区引入入侵物种的概率和定殖压力。我们在巴西的 280 个陆地保护区和 42 个海洋保护区评估了我们的优先级设定模型。在陆地保护区中,84 个被列为优先预防和早期发现保护区,124 个被列为优先控制生物入侵保护区。在海洋保护区中,25 个被列为优先预防和早期发现,7 个被列为优先控制生物入侵。在陆地保护区,人口密度和保护区周围牧草覆盖率是确定优先级的最重要因素,而在海洋保护区,水产养殖活动数量、水道密度、港口距离、石油平台距离和沉没点距离是确定优先级的最重要因素。总之,本文介绍的框架为管理者和利益相关者提供了一种客观的方法,用于决定将有限的资源投入到保护区生物入侵管理中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Which protected areas should be prioritized for prevention and early detection of biological invasions? A new methodological approach

Protected areas are key to global biodiversity conservation efforts. Yet, most protected areas globally face threats of biological invasions either by invasive non-native species established within the protected area or by the imminent establishment of invasive non-native species established in the surrounding landscapes. In face of growing biological invasions, protected area managers must be able to set prevention and control priorities for invasive non-native species management. In this study, we developed a new methodological approach to identify which protected areas should be prioritized for prevention and early detection and which should be prioritized for control of biological invasions. Our methodological approach analyzes the occurrence of invasive species within and around the protected areas and weights the influence of multiple existing pathways to calculate the probability of introduction of invasive species and colonization pressure for each protected area. We evaluated our priority setting model in 280 terrestrial and 42 marine protected areas in Brazil. For the terrestrial protected areas, 84 were classified as priority for prevention and early detection and 124 were classified as priority for control of biological invasions. For the marine protected areas, 25 were classified as priority for prevention and early detection and seven were classified as priority for control of biological invasions. Human population density and percentage of pasture cover surrounding the protected area were the most important factors for priority setting in terrestrial protected areas whereas number of aquiculture activities, density of waterways, distance to ports, distance to oil platforms, and distance from sinking points were the most important factors for priority setting in marine protected areas. In conclusion, the framework presented here provides an objective methodology for managers and stakeholders to decide where to invest their limited resources available for management of biological invasions in protected areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Invasions
Biological Invasions 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
248
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Biological Invasions publishes research and synthesis papers on patterns and processes of biological invasions in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine (including brackish) ecosystems. Also of interest are scholarly papers on management and policy issues as they relate to conservation programs and the global amelioration or control of invasions. The journal will consider proposals for special issues resulting from conferences or workshops on invasions.There are no page charges to publish in this journal.
期刊最新文献
Plant invasion down under: exploring the below-ground impact of invasive plant species on soil properties and invertebrate communities in the Central Plateau of New Zealand Cats in a bag: state-based spending for invasive species management across the United States is haphazard, uncoordinated, and incomplete Range expansion of the invasive hybrid cattail Typha × glauca exceeds that of its maternal plant T. angustifolia in the western Prairie Pothole Region of North America Recruitment curves of three non-native conifers in European temperate forests: implications for invasions Combining storm flood water level and topography to prioritize inter-basin transfer of non-native aquatic species in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1