作为状态而非特征的停止速度:探索多时段停车信号任务中动物内部不同的停车速度

Jordi ter Horst, Michael X Cohen, Bernhard Englitz
{"title":"作为状态而非特征的停止速度:探索多时段停车信号任务中动物内部不同的停车速度","authors":"Jordi ter Horst, Michael X Cohen, Bernhard Englitz","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.05.611370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Being able to reactively stop ongoing movements is important for safe navigation through the environment. Reactive stopping is typically studied using the stop-signal task, where participants are occasionally instructed to stop initiated movements. The speed of stopping, also referred to as the stop-signal reaction time (SSRT), is not observable because successful stopping lacks a response, but can be estimated. Researchers most often acquire one session of data per participant to estimate the speed of stopping, but sometimes more sessions of data are acquired to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio, for example when the task is combined with neural recordings such as electrophysiology. However, it is unknown whether the estimated stopping speed is a fixed trait or a state that can vary under identical experimental conditions. In this study, we investigate whether a separately estimated SSRT for each acquired session is statistically meaningful compared to estimating an across-session SSRT, by collecting many sessions in which male rats performed a stop-signal task. Results revealed that within-animal stopping speeds meaningfully changed from session to session and were not following a trend over time (e.g., due to task learning). Single-session SSRT estimates with lower reliabilities were associated with higher go trial response time variabilities, lower skewness levels of the go trial response time distribution, and lower stop accuracies. We also explored which factors explained changing SSRTs, and showed that motivation, shared motor dynamics, and attention could play a role. In conclusion, we encourage researchers to treat SSRTs as state-like variables when collecting multi-session stop-signal task data, as our results have convincingly shown that stopping speeds are far from trait-like under identical experimental conditions. This session-by-session approach will help future research in which neural signatures of reactive stopping need to be extracted in a time-precise manner, because time-locking stop-related neural activity to session-specific SSRTs is expected to capture the signature more precisely as opposed to an across-session SSRT.","PeriodicalId":501210,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Animal Behavior and Cognition","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stopping Speed as State, Not Trait: Exploring Within-Animal Varying Stopping Speeds in a Multi-Session Stop-Signal Task\",\"authors\":\"Jordi ter Horst, Michael X Cohen, Bernhard Englitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.09.05.611370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Being able to reactively stop ongoing movements is important for safe navigation through the environment. Reactive stopping is typically studied using the stop-signal task, where participants are occasionally instructed to stop initiated movements. The speed of stopping, also referred to as the stop-signal reaction time (SSRT), is not observable because successful stopping lacks a response, but can be estimated. Researchers most often acquire one session of data per participant to estimate the speed of stopping, but sometimes more sessions of data are acquired to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio, for example when the task is combined with neural recordings such as electrophysiology. However, it is unknown whether the estimated stopping speed is a fixed trait or a state that can vary under identical experimental conditions. In this study, we investigate whether a separately estimated SSRT for each acquired session is statistically meaningful compared to estimating an across-session SSRT, by collecting many sessions in which male rats performed a stop-signal task. Results revealed that within-animal stopping speeds meaningfully changed from session to session and were not following a trend over time (e.g., due to task learning). Single-session SSRT estimates with lower reliabilities were associated with higher go trial response time variabilities, lower skewness levels of the go trial response time distribution, and lower stop accuracies. We also explored which factors explained changing SSRTs, and showed that motivation, shared motor dynamics, and attention could play a role. In conclusion, we encourage researchers to treat SSRTs as state-like variables when collecting multi-session stop-signal task data, as our results have convincingly shown that stopping speeds are far from trait-like under identical experimental conditions. This session-by-session approach will help future research in which neural signatures of reactive stopping need to be extracted in a time-precise manner, because time-locking stop-related neural activity to session-specific SSRTs is expected to capture the signature more precisely as opposed to an across-session SSRT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"bioRxiv - Animal Behavior and Cognition\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"bioRxiv - Animal Behavior and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.05.611370\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Animal Behavior and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.05.611370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

能够反应性地停止正在进行的运动对于在环境中安全穿行非常重要。对反应性停止的研究通常采用停止信号任务,即偶尔指示参与者停止已启动的动作。停止的速度也称为停止信号反应时间(SSRT),由于成功停止时没有反应,因此无法观察,但可以估计。研究人员通常会为每位受试者采集一次数据来估算停止速度,但有时也会采集更多的数据来最大限度地提高信噪比,例如当任务与电生理学等神经记录相结合时。然而,在相同的实验条件下,估计的停止速度是一个固定的特征,还是一个可以变化的状态,目前还不得而知。在本研究中,我们通过收集雄性大鼠执行停止信号任务的多个片段,研究了对每个获取片段单独估算的SSRT与估算跨片段SSRT相比是否具有统计学意义。结果表明,动物内部的停止速度在不同阶段会发生有意义的变化,而不是随着时间的推移而变化(例如,由于任务学习)。可靠性较低的单次SSRT估计值与较高的围棋试验反应时间变异性、较低的围棋试验反应时间分布偏度水平和较低的停止准确性有关。我们还探讨了哪些因素可以解释 SSRT 的变化,结果表明,动机、共同运动动力和注意力可能会起到一定的作用。总之,我们鼓励研究人员在收集多时段停止信号任务数据时,将SSRT视为状态变量,因为我们的研究结果令人信服地表明,在相同的实验条件下,停止速度远非特征变量。这种分时段的方法将有助于未来需要以精确的时间方式提取反应性停止神经特征的研究,因为将与停止相关的神经活动与特定时段的 SSRT 进行时间锁定有望比跨时段的 SSRT 更精确地捕捉特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stopping Speed as State, Not Trait: Exploring Within-Animal Varying Stopping Speeds in a Multi-Session Stop-Signal Task
Being able to reactively stop ongoing movements is important for safe navigation through the environment. Reactive stopping is typically studied using the stop-signal task, where participants are occasionally instructed to stop initiated movements. The speed of stopping, also referred to as the stop-signal reaction time (SSRT), is not observable because successful stopping lacks a response, but can be estimated. Researchers most often acquire one session of data per participant to estimate the speed of stopping, but sometimes more sessions of data are acquired to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio, for example when the task is combined with neural recordings such as electrophysiology. However, it is unknown whether the estimated stopping speed is a fixed trait or a state that can vary under identical experimental conditions. In this study, we investigate whether a separately estimated SSRT for each acquired session is statistically meaningful compared to estimating an across-session SSRT, by collecting many sessions in which male rats performed a stop-signal task. Results revealed that within-animal stopping speeds meaningfully changed from session to session and were not following a trend over time (e.g., due to task learning). Single-session SSRT estimates with lower reliabilities were associated with higher go trial response time variabilities, lower skewness levels of the go trial response time distribution, and lower stop accuracies. We also explored which factors explained changing SSRTs, and showed that motivation, shared motor dynamics, and attention could play a role. In conclusion, we encourage researchers to treat SSRTs as state-like variables when collecting multi-session stop-signal task data, as our results have convincingly shown that stopping speeds are far from trait-like under identical experimental conditions. This session-by-session approach will help future research in which neural signatures of reactive stopping need to be extracted in a time-precise manner, because time-locking stop-related neural activity to session-specific SSRTs is expected to capture the signature more precisely as opposed to an across-session SSRT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emotional contexts influence vocal individuality in ungulates Athene cunicularia hypugaea wintering in a central California urban setting arrive later, leave earlier, prefer sheltered micro-habitat, tolerate rain, and contend with diverse predators Monkeys Predict US Elections Meat transfers follow social ties in the multi-level society of Guinea baboons but are not related to male reproductive success Jumping spiders are not fooled by the peripheral drift illusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1