多腔振荡水柱装置的实验和数值分析

IF 2.5 3区 工程技术 Journal of Hydrodynamics Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1007/s42241-024-0043-5
Jorge Gadelho, Kourosh Rezanejad, C. Guedes Soares
{"title":"多腔振荡水柱装置的实验和数值分析","authors":"Jorge Gadelho,&nbsp;Kourosh Rezanejad,&nbsp;C. Guedes Soares","doi":"10.1007/s42241-024-0043-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A review of multi-chamber oscillating water column (OWC) device designs is presented. Two significant variations of these devices are discussed, onshore OWC (OOWC) and a floating OWC (FOWC). The efficiency results of several theoretical studies based on low- and high-fidelity numerical models are presented and compared with the model scale results. Generally, low-fidelity numerical models are very fast to run, but their accuracy is limited compared with high-fidelity numerical models. Scaled model experiments usually give results much more accurate than numerical models, but they need adequate facilities and are very expensive. In the case of the OOWC, all models show a similar trend of total efficiency, but while the analytical model shows a maximum value of around 90% efficiency, the CFD model shows 60%, and the experiments only go up to 40%. The main reason is connected with the mathematical simplifications and assumptions that do not represent all the hydrodynamic and aerodynamic processes between the water, air, and structure. For the case of the FOWC, interestingly, the experimental results show a maximum efficiency of almost 100%, while the analytical model only predicts a maximum of 80%. The efficiency seems highly dependent on the heave motion resonance of the entire device, where the analytical model fails to predict this natural frequency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrodynamics","volume":"36 3","pages":"492 - 503"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental and numerical analysis of multi-chamber oscillating water column devices\",\"authors\":\"Jorge Gadelho,&nbsp;Kourosh Rezanejad,&nbsp;C. Guedes Soares\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42241-024-0043-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A review of multi-chamber oscillating water column (OWC) device designs is presented. Two significant variations of these devices are discussed, onshore OWC (OOWC) and a floating OWC (FOWC). The efficiency results of several theoretical studies based on low- and high-fidelity numerical models are presented and compared with the model scale results. Generally, low-fidelity numerical models are very fast to run, but their accuracy is limited compared with high-fidelity numerical models. Scaled model experiments usually give results much more accurate than numerical models, but they need adequate facilities and are very expensive. In the case of the OOWC, all models show a similar trend of total efficiency, but while the analytical model shows a maximum value of around 90% efficiency, the CFD model shows 60%, and the experiments only go up to 40%. The main reason is connected with the mathematical simplifications and assumptions that do not represent all the hydrodynamic and aerodynamic processes between the water, air, and structure. For the case of the FOWC, interestingly, the experimental results show a maximum efficiency of almost 100%, while the analytical model only predicts a maximum of 80%. The efficiency seems highly dependent on the heave motion resonance of the entire device, where the analytical model fails to predict this natural frequency.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrodynamics\",\"volume\":\"36 3\",\"pages\":\"492 - 503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42241-024-0043-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42241-024-0043-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文综述了多腔振荡水柱(OWC)装置的设计。讨论了这些装置的两个重要变体,即陆上 OWC(OOWC)和浮动 OWC(FOWC)。介绍了基于低保真和高保真数值模型的几项理论研究的效率结果,并将其与模型比例结果进行了比较。一般来说,低保真数值模型运行速度非常快,但与高保真数值模型相比,其精度有限。按比例模型实验的结果通常比数值模型精确得多,但它们需要足够的设施,而且非常昂贵。就 OOWC 而言,所有模型都显示出类似的总效率趋势,但分析模型显示的最大效率值约为 90%,CFD 模型显示为 60%,而实验结果仅为 40%。主要原因与数学简化和假设有关,因为数学简化和假设并不能代表水、空气和结构之间的所有流体力学和空气动力学过程。就 FOWC 而言,有趣的是,实验结果显示最高效率几乎达到 100%,而分析模型预测的最高效率仅为 80%。效率似乎在很大程度上取决于整个设备的波浪运动共振,而分析模型无法预测这一固有频率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experimental and numerical analysis of multi-chamber oscillating water column devices

A review of multi-chamber oscillating water column (OWC) device designs is presented. Two significant variations of these devices are discussed, onshore OWC (OOWC) and a floating OWC (FOWC). The efficiency results of several theoretical studies based on low- and high-fidelity numerical models are presented and compared with the model scale results. Generally, low-fidelity numerical models are very fast to run, but their accuracy is limited compared with high-fidelity numerical models. Scaled model experiments usually give results much more accurate than numerical models, but they need adequate facilities and are very expensive. In the case of the OOWC, all models show a similar trend of total efficiency, but while the analytical model shows a maximum value of around 90% efficiency, the CFD model shows 60%, and the experiments only go up to 40%. The main reason is connected with the mathematical simplifications and assumptions that do not represent all the hydrodynamic and aerodynamic processes between the water, air, and structure. For the case of the FOWC, interestingly, the experimental results show a maximum efficiency of almost 100%, while the analytical model only predicts a maximum of 80%. The efficiency seems highly dependent on the heave motion resonance of the entire device, where the analytical model fails to predict this natural frequency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
12.00%
发文量
2374
审稿时长
4.6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Hydrodynamics is devoted to the publication of original theoretical, computational and experimental contributions to the all aspects of hydrodynamics. It covers advances in the naval architecture and ocean engineering, marine and ocean engineering, environmental engineering, water conservancy and hydropower engineering, energy exploration, chemical engineering, biological and biomedical engineering etc.
期刊最新文献
Heat transfer and flow structure in centrally-confined 2-D Rayleigh-Bénard convection Numerical study of air cavity characteristics of bow wave breaking of KCS ship under different speeds Effects of logjams on river hydrodynamics under inundation conditions Comparison of DES and URANS: Estimation of fluctuating pressure from URANS simulations in stilling basins Analysis of clearance flow of a fuel pump based on dynamical mode decomposition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1