通过一项回顾性研究,为今后在神经重症监护和神经重症监护后脑卒中患者中开展盐酸金刚烷胺随机对照试验提供依据

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY BMC Neurology Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1186/s12883-024-03854-2
Enzo G. Plaitano, Rebecca A. Scharf, Pakinam E. Aboutaleb, Andrea L. Glennon, Emiliya Melkumova, Deborah M. Green-LaRoche
{"title":"通过一项回顾性研究,为今后在神经重症监护和神经重症监护后脑卒中患者中开展盐酸金刚烷胺随机对照试验提供依据","authors":"Enzo G. Plaitano, Rebecca A. Scharf, Pakinam E. Aboutaleb, Andrea L. Glennon, Emiliya Melkumova, Deborah M. Green-LaRoche","doi":"10.1186/s12883-024-03854-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Amantadine hydrochloride has been increasingly prescribed as a neurostimulant for neurocritical care stroke patients to promote wakefulness during inpatient recovery. However, a lack of guidelines makes it difficult to decide who may benefit from this pharmacotherapy and when amantadine should be initiated during the hospital stay. This study aims to determine some factors that may be associated with favorable response to amantadine to inform future randomized controlled trials of amantadine in critical care or post-critical care stroke patients. Retrospective chart review for this study included neurocritical care and post-neurocritical care patients with acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke who were started on amantadine (N = 34) in the years 2016–2019. Patients were labeled as either responders or nonresponders of amantadine within 9 days of initiation using novel amantadine scoring criteria utilized and published in Neurocritical Care in the year 2021, which included spontaneous wakefulness and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Amantadine response status and predictive variables were analyzed using nonparametric tests and adjusted multivariable regression models. There were large but nonsignificant variations in the median total milligrams of amantadine received in the first 9 days (IQR = 700-1,450 mg, p = 0.727). GCS on the day before amantadine initiation was significantly higher for responders (median = 12, IQR = 9–14) than nonresponders (median = 9, IQR = 8–10, p = 0.009). Favorable responder status was significantly associated with initiation in the critical care unit versus the step-down unit or the general medical/surgical floor [��=1.02, 95% CI (0.10, 1.93), p = 0.031], but there was no significant associations with hospital day number started [��=-0.003, 95% CI (-0.02, 0.02), p = 0.772]. Future randomized controlled trials of amantadine in hospitalized stroke patients should possibly consider examining dose-dependent relationships to establish stroke-specific dosing guidelines, minimum GCS threshold for which amantadine is efficacious, and the impact of patients’ determined level of acuity on clinical outcomes instead of solely examining the impact of earlier amantadine initiation by hospital day number. Future research with larger sample sizes is needed to further examine these relationships and inform future clinical trials.","PeriodicalId":9170,"journal":{"name":"BMC Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informing future randomized controlled trials of amantadine hydrochloride in neurocritical care and post-neurocritical care stroke patients through a retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"Enzo G. Plaitano, Rebecca A. Scharf, Pakinam E. Aboutaleb, Andrea L. Glennon, Emiliya Melkumova, Deborah M. Green-LaRoche\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12883-024-03854-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Amantadine hydrochloride has been increasingly prescribed as a neurostimulant for neurocritical care stroke patients to promote wakefulness during inpatient recovery. However, a lack of guidelines makes it difficult to decide who may benefit from this pharmacotherapy and when amantadine should be initiated during the hospital stay. This study aims to determine some factors that may be associated with favorable response to amantadine to inform future randomized controlled trials of amantadine in critical care or post-critical care stroke patients. Retrospective chart review for this study included neurocritical care and post-neurocritical care patients with acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke who were started on amantadine (N = 34) in the years 2016–2019. Patients were labeled as either responders or nonresponders of amantadine within 9 days of initiation using novel amantadine scoring criteria utilized and published in Neurocritical Care in the year 2021, which included spontaneous wakefulness and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Amantadine response status and predictive variables were analyzed using nonparametric tests and adjusted multivariable regression models. There were large but nonsignificant variations in the median total milligrams of amantadine received in the first 9 days (IQR = 700-1,450 mg, p = 0.727). GCS on the day before amantadine initiation was significantly higher for responders (median = 12, IQR = 9–14) than nonresponders (median = 9, IQR = 8–10, p = 0.009). Favorable responder status was significantly associated with initiation in the critical care unit versus the step-down unit or the general medical/surgical floor [��=1.02, 95% CI (0.10, 1.93), p = 0.031], but there was no significant associations with hospital day number started [��=-0.003, 95% CI (-0.02, 0.02), p = 0.772]. Future randomized controlled trials of amantadine in hospitalized stroke patients should possibly consider examining dose-dependent relationships to establish stroke-specific dosing guidelines, minimum GCS threshold for which amantadine is efficacious, and the impact of patients’ determined level of acuity on clinical outcomes instead of solely examining the impact of earlier amantadine initiation by hospital day number. Future research with larger sample sizes is needed to further examine these relationships and inform future clinical trials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03854-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03854-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的神经重症卒中患者在住院恢复期间使用盐酸金刚烷胺作为神经刺激剂来促进清醒。然而,由于缺乏相关指南,很难确定哪些患者可从这种药物治疗中获益,以及何时应在住院期间开始使用金刚烷胺。本研究旨在确定一些可能与金刚烷胺良好反应相关的因素,为今后在重症监护或重症监护后脑卒中患者中开展金刚烷胺随机对照试验提供参考。本研究的回顾性病历审查包括2016-2019年间开始服用金刚烷胺的急性缺血性或出血性卒中神经重症监护患者和神经重症监护后患者(N = 34)。在开始使用金刚烷胺的 9 天内,患者被标记为金刚烷胺应答者或无应答者,使用的是 2021 年在《神经重症监护》(Neurocritical Care)杂志上发表的新型金刚烷胺评分标准,其中包括自发清醒和格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)。使用非参数检验和调整后的多变量回归模型对金刚烷胺反应状态和预测变量进行了分析。前9天接受的金刚烷胺总毫克数的中位数(IQR=700-1,450毫克,p=0.727)有很大差异,但无显著性。开始服用金刚烷胺前一天,应答者的 GCS(中位数 = 12,IQR = 9-14)明显高于无应答者(中位数 = 9,IQR = 8-10,p = 0.009)。有利的应答者状态与在重症监护病房或普通内科/外科楼层开始治疗有显著相关性[��=1.02,95% CI (0.10,1.93),p = 0.031],但与开始住院天数无显著相关性[��=-0.003,95% CI (-0.02,0.02),p = 0.772]。未来针对住院卒中患者的金刚烷胺随机对照试验应考虑研究剂量依赖关系,以制定卒中特异性剂量指南、金刚烷胺有效的最低 GCS 阈值以及患者确定的敏锐程度对临床预后的影响,而不是仅仅研究按住院天数提前使用金刚烷胺的影响。未来的研究需要更大的样本量来进一步研究这些关系,并为未来的临床试验提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Informing future randomized controlled trials of amantadine hydrochloride in neurocritical care and post-neurocritical care stroke patients through a retrospective study
Amantadine hydrochloride has been increasingly prescribed as a neurostimulant for neurocritical care stroke patients to promote wakefulness during inpatient recovery. However, a lack of guidelines makes it difficult to decide who may benefit from this pharmacotherapy and when amantadine should be initiated during the hospital stay. This study aims to determine some factors that may be associated with favorable response to amantadine to inform future randomized controlled trials of amantadine in critical care or post-critical care stroke patients. Retrospective chart review for this study included neurocritical care and post-neurocritical care patients with acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke who were started on amantadine (N = 34) in the years 2016–2019. Patients were labeled as either responders or nonresponders of amantadine within 9 days of initiation using novel amantadine scoring criteria utilized and published in Neurocritical Care in the year 2021, which included spontaneous wakefulness and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Amantadine response status and predictive variables were analyzed using nonparametric tests and adjusted multivariable regression models. There were large but nonsignificant variations in the median total milligrams of amantadine received in the first 9 days (IQR = 700-1,450 mg, p = 0.727). GCS on the day before amantadine initiation was significantly higher for responders (median = 12, IQR = 9–14) than nonresponders (median = 9, IQR = 8–10, p = 0.009). Favorable responder status was significantly associated with initiation in the critical care unit versus the step-down unit or the general medical/surgical floor [��=1.02, 95% CI (0.10, 1.93), p = 0.031], but there was no significant associations with hospital day number started [��=-0.003, 95% CI (-0.02, 0.02), p = 0.772]. Future randomized controlled trials of amantadine in hospitalized stroke patients should possibly consider examining dose-dependent relationships to establish stroke-specific dosing guidelines, minimum GCS threshold for which amantadine is efficacious, and the impact of patients’ determined level of acuity on clinical outcomes instead of solely examining the impact of earlier amantadine initiation by hospital day number. Future research with larger sample sizes is needed to further examine these relationships and inform future clinical trials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Neurology
BMC Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
428
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Neurology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of neurological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Risk factors for puncture-related complications after cerebrovascular angiography and neuroendovascular intervention with distal transradial approach. Osmotic demyelination syndrome: revisiting the diagnostic criteria through two fatal cases. Exploring the appropriate situation of performing CSF mNGS in patients with proposed intracranial infections. Intradural extramedullary cystic lesions: an interesting cauda equina cysticercosis case report and a literature review. Pyridoxine-dependent epilepsy caused by an ALDH7A1 mutation in an infant girl: the first case report in Syria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1