{"title":"用 EUROSCORE II 评估中重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的预后:一项长期回顾性研究","authors":"Jilin Li","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.23.24312516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims\nAortic stenosis (AS) was a prevalent heart valve disease whose morbidity and mortality can be reduced by aortic valve replacement (AVR) . EUROSCORE II assesses the perioperative mortality of severe AS patients undergoing AVR. This study explored EUROSCORE II's prognostic value for long-term all-cause mortality of Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe AS and determined whether AVR affects this.\nMethods\nAllocated to four groups following the EUROSCORE II (cut-off value of 4% ) and whether performed AVR, 544 patients with moderate-to-severe AS were enrolled. Baseline data, Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression and subgroup analysis were used to analyse the relationship between EUROSCORE II and participants' all-cause mortality. Furthermore, ROC analysis determining the optimal cut-off value of EUROSCORE II was utilized.\nResults\nDuring a median follow-up of 41.4 months, 177 (21.5%) participants reached the endpoint, with higher risks (EUROSCORE II ≥4%) and no AVR exhibited significantly increased all-cause mortality rates compared to other groups (55.4% vs. 6.5%, 13.4%, and 32.7%; P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves confirmed these findings (log-rank test P<0.001). Cox regression analysis revealed a 6.891-fold higher risk (HR, 6.891; 95% CI, 3.083-15.401; P<0.001) in patients without AVR with higher EUROSCORE II. The adjusted model (P<0.01) and subgroup analyses (without AVR P=0.001; with AVR P=0.029) supported EUROSCORE II's prognostic value for all-cause mortality. The optimal EUROSCORE II cut-off for predicting all-cause mortality in patients without AVR was 2.23% (AUC 0.675).\nConclusions\nEUROSCORE II (cut-off value 4%) and AVR independently impact the long-term prognosis of patients with moderate-to-severe AS.","PeriodicalId":501297,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of EUROSCORE II to determine the prognosis of patients with moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis: a long-term retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"Jilin Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.08.23.24312516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Aims\\nAortic stenosis (AS) was a prevalent heart valve disease whose morbidity and mortality can be reduced by aortic valve replacement (AVR) . EUROSCORE II assesses the perioperative mortality of severe AS patients undergoing AVR. This study explored EUROSCORE II's prognostic value for long-term all-cause mortality of Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe AS and determined whether AVR affects this.\\nMethods\\nAllocated to four groups following the EUROSCORE II (cut-off value of 4% ) and whether performed AVR, 544 patients with moderate-to-severe AS were enrolled. Baseline data, Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression and subgroup analysis were used to analyse the relationship between EUROSCORE II and participants' all-cause mortality. Furthermore, ROC analysis determining the optimal cut-off value of EUROSCORE II was utilized.\\nResults\\nDuring a median follow-up of 41.4 months, 177 (21.5%) participants reached the endpoint, with higher risks (EUROSCORE II ≥4%) and no AVR exhibited significantly increased all-cause mortality rates compared to other groups (55.4% vs. 6.5%, 13.4%, and 32.7%; P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves confirmed these findings (log-rank test P<0.001). Cox regression analysis revealed a 6.891-fold higher risk (HR, 6.891; 95% CI, 3.083-15.401; P<0.001) in patients without AVR with higher EUROSCORE II. The adjusted model (P<0.01) and subgroup analyses (without AVR P=0.001; with AVR P=0.029) supported EUROSCORE II's prognostic value for all-cause mortality. The optimal EUROSCORE II cut-off for predicting all-cause mortality in patients without AVR was 2.23% (AUC 0.675).\\nConclusions\\nEUROSCORE II (cut-off value 4%) and AVR independently impact the long-term prognosis of patients with moderate-to-severe AS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.23.24312516\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.23.24312516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)是一种常见的心脏瓣膜疾病,主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)可降低其发病率和死亡率。EUROSCORE II 评估了接受主动脉瓣置换术的严重 AS 患者的围手术期死亡率。本研究探讨了 EUROSCORE II 对中国中重度 AS 患者长期全因死亡率的预后价值,并确定 AVR 是否会对此产生影响。采用基线数据、Kaplan-Meier、Cox回归和亚组分析来分析EUROSCORE II与参与者全因死亡率之间的关系。结果在中位 41.4 个月的随访期间,177 名(21.5%)参与者达到终点,与其他组别相比,风险较高(EUROSCORE II ≥4%)和未进行 AVR 的参与者的全因死亡率显著增加(55.4% vs. 6.5%、13.4% 和 32.7%;P<0.001)。卡普兰-梅耶曲线证实了这些发现(对数秩检验 P<0.001)。Cox 回归分析显示,EUROSCORE II 较高的未行 AVR 患者的风险高出 6.891 倍(HR,6.891;95% CI,3.083-15.401;P<0.001)。调整模型(P<0.01)和亚组分析(无 AVR P=0.001;有 AVR P=0.029)支持 EUROSCORE II 对全因死亡率的预后价值。预测无 AVR 患者全因死亡率的最佳 EUROSCORE II 临界值为 2.23%(AUC 0.675)。
Evaluation of EUROSCORE II to determine the prognosis of patients with moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis: a long-term retrospective study
Background and Aims
Aortic stenosis (AS) was a prevalent heart valve disease whose morbidity and mortality can be reduced by aortic valve replacement (AVR) . EUROSCORE II assesses the perioperative mortality of severe AS patients undergoing AVR. This study explored EUROSCORE II's prognostic value for long-term all-cause mortality of Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe AS and determined whether AVR affects this.
Methods
Allocated to four groups following the EUROSCORE II (cut-off value of 4% ) and whether performed AVR, 544 patients with moderate-to-severe AS were enrolled. Baseline data, Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression and subgroup analysis were used to analyse the relationship between EUROSCORE II and participants' all-cause mortality. Furthermore, ROC analysis determining the optimal cut-off value of EUROSCORE II was utilized.
Results
During a median follow-up of 41.4 months, 177 (21.5%) participants reached the endpoint, with higher risks (EUROSCORE II ≥4%) and no AVR exhibited significantly increased all-cause mortality rates compared to other groups (55.4% vs. 6.5%, 13.4%, and 32.7%; P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves confirmed these findings (log-rank test P<0.001). Cox regression analysis revealed a 6.891-fold higher risk (HR, 6.891; 95% CI, 3.083-15.401; P<0.001) in patients without AVR with higher EUROSCORE II. The adjusted model (P<0.01) and subgroup analyses (without AVR P=0.001; with AVR P=0.029) supported EUROSCORE II's prognostic value for all-cause mortality. The optimal EUROSCORE II cut-off for predicting all-cause mortality in patients without AVR was 2.23% (AUC 0.675).
Conclusions
EUROSCORE II (cut-off value 4%) and AVR independently impact the long-term prognosis of patients with moderate-to-severe AS.