关于漏洞管理和平台安全功能的开源软件维护者混合方法研究

Jessy Ayala, Yu-Jye Tung, Joshua Garcia
{"title":"关于漏洞管理和平台安全功能的开源软件维护者混合方法研究","authors":"Jessy Ayala, Yu-Jye Tung, Joshua Garcia","doi":"arxiv-2409.07669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In open-source software (OSS), software vulnerabilities have significantly\nincreased. Although researchers have investigated the perspectives of\nvulnerability reporters and OSS contributor security practices, understanding\nthe perspectives of OSS maintainers on vulnerability management and platform\nsecurity features is currently understudied. In this paper, we investigate the\nperspectives of OSS maintainers who maintain projects listed in the GitHub\nAdvisory Database. We explore this area by conducting two studies: identifying\naspects through a listing survey ($n_1=80$) and gathering insights from\nsemi-structured interviews ($n_2=22$). Of the 37 identified aspects, we find\nthat supply chain mistrust and lack of automation for vulnerability management\nare the most challenging, and barriers to adopting platform security features\ninclude a lack of awareness and the perception that they are not necessary.\nSurprisingly, we find that despite being previously vulnerable, some\nmaintainers still allow public vulnerability reporting, or ignore reports\naltogether. Based on our findings, we discuss implications for OSS platforms\nand how the research community can better support OSS vulnerability management\nefforts.","PeriodicalId":501278,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Software Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Mixed-Methods Study of Open-Source Software Maintainers On Vulnerability Management and Platform Security Features\",\"authors\":\"Jessy Ayala, Yu-Jye Tung, Joshua Garcia\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.07669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In open-source software (OSS), software vulnerabilities have significantly\\nincreased. Although researchers have investigated the perspectives of\\nvulnerability reporters and OSS contributor security practices, understanding\\nthe perspectives of OSS maintainers on vulnerability management and platform\\nsecurity features is currently understudied. In this paper, we investigate the\\nperspectives of OSS maintainers who maintain projects listed in the GitHub\\nAdvisory Database. We explore this area by conducting two studies: identifying\\naspects through a listing survey ($n_1=80$) and gathering insights from\\nsemi-structured interviews ($n_2=22$). Of the 37 identified aspects, we find\\nthat supply chain mistrust and lack of automation for vulnerability management\\nare the most challenging, and barriers to adopting platform security features\\ninclude a lack of awareness and the perception that they are not necessary.\\nSurprisingly, we find that despite being previously vulnerable, some\\nmaintainers still allow public vulnerability reporting, or ignore reports\\naltogether. Based on our findings, we discuss implications for OSS platforms\\nand how the research community can better support OSS vulnerability management\\nefforts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Software Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07669\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在开放源码软件(OSS)中,软件漏洞显著增加。虽然研究人员已经调查了漏洞报告者的观点和开放源码软件贡献者的安全实践,但目前对了解开放源码软件维护者在漏洞管理和平台安全功能方面的观点还研究不足。在本文中,我们调查了维护 GitHub 管理数据库所列项目的开放源码软件维护者的观点。我们通过两项研究探索了这一领域:通过列表调查($n_1=80$)确定方面;通过半结构化访谈($n_2=22$)收集见解。在确定的 37 个方面中,我们发现供应链不信任和缺乏漏洞管理自动化是最具挑战性的,而采用平台安全功能的障碍包括缺乏意识和认为这些功能没有必要。基于我们的发现,我们讨论了对开放源码软件平台的影响,以及研究界如何才能更好地支持开放源码软件漏洞管理工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Mixed-Methods Study of Open-Source Software Maintainers On Vulnerability Management and Platform Security Features
In open-source software (OSS), software vulnerabilities have significantly increased. Although researchers have investigated the perspectives of vulnerability reporters and OSS contributor security practices, understanding the perspectives of OSS maintainers on vulnerability management and platform security features is currently understudied. In this paper, we investigate the perspectives of OSS maintainers who maintain projects listed in the GitHub Advisory Database. We explore this area by conducting two studies: identifying aspects through a listing survey ($n_1=80$) and gathering insights from semi-structured interviews ($n_2=22$). Of the 37 identified aspects, we find that supply chain mistrust and lack of automation for vulnerability management are the most challenging, and barriers to adopting platform security features include a lack of awareness and the perception that they are not necessary. Surprisingly, we find that despite being previously vulnerable, some maintainers still allow public vulnerability reporting, or ignore reports altogether. Based on our findings, we discuss implications for OSS platforms and how the research community can better support OSS vulnerability management efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Promise and Peril of Collaborative Code Generation Models: Balancing Effectiveness and Memorization Shannon Entropy is better Feature than Category and Sentiment in User Feedback Processing Motivations, Challenges, Best Practices, and Benefits for Bots and Conversational Agents in Software Engineering: A Multivocal Literature Review A Taxonomy of Self-Admitted Technical Debt in Deep Learning Systems Investigating team maturity in an agile automotive reorganization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1