Haowei Cheng, Jati H. Husen, Sien Reeve Peralta, Bowen Jiang, Nobukazu Yoshioka, Naoyasu Ubayashi, Hironori Washizaki
{"title":"用于需求工程的生成式人工智能:系统文献综述","authors":"Haowei Cheng, Jati H. Husen, Sien Reeve Peralta, Bowen Jiang, Nobukazu Yoshioka, Naoyasu Ubayashi, Hironori Washizaki","doi":"arxiv-2409.06741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Generative AI (GenAI) has emerged as a transformative tool in\nsoftware engineering, with requirements engineering (RE) actively exploring its\npotential to revolutionize processes and outcomes. The integration of GenAI\ninto RE presents both promising opportunities and significant challenges that\nnecessitate systematic analysis and evaluation. Objective: This paper presents\na comprehensive systematic literature review (SLR) analyzing state-of-the-art\napplications and innovative proposals leveraging GenAI in RE. It surveys\nstudies focusing on the utilization of GenAI to enhance RE processes while\nidentifying key challenges and opportunities in this rapidly evolving field.\nMethod: A rigorous SLR methodology was used to analyze 27 carefully selected\nprimary studies in-depth. The review examined research questions pertaining to\nthe application of GenAI across various RE phases, the models and techniques\nused, and the challenges encountered in implementation and adoption. Results:\nThe most salient findings include i) a predominant focus on the early stages of\nRE, particularly the elicitation and analysis of requirements, indicating\npotential for expansion into later phases; ii) the dominance of large language\nmodels, especially the GPT series, highlighting the need for diverse AI\napproaches; and iii) persistent challenges in domain-specific applications and\nthe interpretability of AI-generated outputs, underscoring areas requiring\nfurther research and development. Conclusions: The results highlight the\ncritical need for comprehensive evaluation frameworks, improved human-AI\ncollaboration models, and thorough consideration of ethical implications in\nGenAI-assisted RE. Future research should prioritize extending GenAI\napplications across the entire RE lifecycle, enhancing domain-specific\ncapabilities, and developing strategies for responsible AI integration in RE\npractices.","PeriodicalId":501278,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Software Engineering","volume":"214 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generative AI for Requirements Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review\",\"authors\":\"Haowei Cheng, Jati H. Husen, Sien Reeve Peralta, Bowen Jiang, Nobukazu Yoshioka, Naoyasu Ubayashi, Hironori Washizaki\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.06741\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context: Generative AI (GenAI) has emerged as a transformative tool in\\nsoftware engineering, with requirements engineering (RE) actively exploring its\\npotential to revolutionize processes and outcomes. The integration of GenAI\\ninto RE presents both promising opportunities and significant challenges that\\nnecessitate systematic analysis and evaluation. Objective: This paper presents\\na comprehensive systematic literature review (SLR) analyzing state-of-the-art\\napplications and innovative proposals leveraging GenAI in RE. It surveys\\nstudies focusing on the utilization of GenAI to enhance RE processes while\\nidentifying key challenges and opportunities in this rapidly evolving field.\\nMethod: A rigorous SLR methodology was used to analyze 27 carefully selected\\nprimary studies in-depth. The review examined research questions pertaining to\\nthe application of GenAI across various RE phases, the models and techniques\\nused, and the challenges encountered in implementation and adoption. Results:\\nThe most salient findings include i) a predominant focus on the early stages of\\nRE, particularly the elicitation and analysis of requirements, indicating\\npotential for expansion into later phases; ii) the dominance of large language\\nmodels, especially the GPT series, highlighting the need for diverse AI\\napproaches; and iii) persistent challenges in domain-specific applications and\\nthe interpretability of AI-generated outputs, underscoring areas requiring\\nfurther research and development. Conclusions: The results highlight the\\ncritical need for comprehensive evaluation frameworks, improved human-AI\\ncollaboration models, and thorough consideration of ethical implications in\\nGenAI-assisted RE. Future research should prioritize extending GenAI\\napplications across the entire RE lifecycle, enhancing domain-specific\\ncapabilities, and developing strategies for responsible AI integration in RE\\npractices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"214 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.06741\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.06741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:生成式人工智能(GenAI)已成为软件工程领域的变革性工具,而需求工程(RE)也在积极探索其彻底改变流程和结果的潜力。将 GenAI 整合到 RE 中既带来了大有可为的机遇,也面临着巨大的挑战,需要进行系统分析和评估。目标:本文介绍了全面系统的文献综述(SLR),分析了在 RE 中利用 GenAI 的最新应用和创新提案。它调查了有关利用 GenAI 增强可再生能源流程的研究,同时确定了这一快速发展领域的关键挑战和机遇:方法:采用严格的 SLR 方法深入分析了精心挑选的 27 项主要研究。方法:采用严格的 SLR 方法深入分析了精心挑选的 27 项主要研究,审查了与 GenAI 在可再生能源各阶段的应用、所使用的模型和技术以及在实施和采用过程中遇到的挑战有关的研究问题。结果:最突出的发现包括 i) 主要集中在 RE 的早期阶段,特别是需求的激发和分析,这表明有可能扩展到后期阶段;ii) 大型语言模型,特别是 GPT 系列占主导地位,这凸显了对多样化人工智能方法的需求;iii) 在特定领域应用和人工智能生成输出的可解释性方面持续存在挑战,这强调了需要进一步研究和开发的领域。结论:研究结果突出表明,在 GenAI 辅助 RE 中,迫切需要全面的评估框架、改进的人类-人工智能合作模型以及对伦理影响的全面考虑。未来的研究应优先考虑将 GenAI 应用扩展到整个可再生能源生命周期,增强特定领域的能力,并为负责任地将人工智能整合到可再生能源实践中制定战略。
Generative AI for Requirements Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review
Context: Generative AI (GenAI) has emerged as a transformative tool in
software engineering, with requirements engineering (RE) actively exploring its
potential to revolutionize processes and outcomes. The integration of GenAI
into RE presents both promising opportunities and significant challenges that
necessitate systematic analysis and evaluation. Objective: This paper presents
a comprehensive systematic literature review (SLR) analyzing state-of-the-art
applications and innovative proposals leveraging GenAI in RE. It surveys
studies focusing on the utilization of GenAI to enhance RE processes while
identifying key challenges and opportunities in this rapidly evolving field.
Method: A rigorous SLR methodology was used to analyze 27 carefully selected
primary studies in-depth. The review examined research questions pertaining to
the application of GenAI across various RE phases, the models and techniques
used, and the challenges encountered in implementation and adoption. Results:
The most salient findings include i) a predominant focus on the early stages of
RE, particularly the elicitation and analysis of requirements, indicating
potential for expansion into later phases; ii) the dominance of large language
models, especially the GPT series, highlighting the need for diverse AI
approaches; and iii) persistent challenges in domain-specific applications and
the interpretability of AI-generated outputs, underscoring areas requiring
further research and development. Conclusions: The results highlight the
critical need for comprehensive evaluation frameworks, improved human-AI
collaboration models, and thorough consideration of ethical implications in
GenAI-assisted RE. Future research should prioritize extending GenAI
applications across the entire RE lifecycle, enhancing domain-specific
capabilities, and developing strategies for responsible AI integration in RE
practices.