衡量神经架构训练效率的框架

Eduardo Cueto-Mendoza, John D. Kelleher
{"title":"衡量神经架构训练效率的框架","authors":"Eduardo Cueto-Mendoza, John D. Kelleher","doi":"arxiv-2409.07925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Measuring Efficiency in neural network system development is an open research\nproblem. This paper presents an experimental framework to measure the training\nefficiency of a neural architecture. To demonstrate our approach, we analyze\nthe training efficiency of Convolutional Neural Networks and Bayesian\nequivalents on the MNIST and CIFAR-10 tasks. Our results show that training\nefficiency decays as training progresses and varies across different stopping\ncriteria for a given neural model and learning task. We also find a non-linear\nrelationship between training stopping criteria, training Efficiency, model\nsize, and training Efficiency. Furthermore, we illustrate the potential confounding effects of overtraining\non measuring the training efficiency of a neural architecture. Regarding\nrelative training efficiency across different architectures, our results\nindicate that CNNs are more efficient than BCNNs on both datasets. More\ngenerally, as a learning task becomes more complex, the relative difference in\ntraining efficiency between different architectures becomes more pronounced.","PeriodicalId":501301,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Machine Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A framework for measuring the training efficiency of a neural architecture\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo Cueto-Mendoza, John D. Kelleher\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.07925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Measuring Efficiency in neural network system development is an open research\\nproblem. This paper presents an experimental framework to measure the training\\nefficiency of a neural architecture. To demonstrate our approach, we analyze\\nthe training efficiency of Convolutional Neural Networks and Bayesian\\nequivalents on the MNIST and CIFAR-10 tasks. Our results show that training\\nefficiency decays as training progresses and varies across different stopping\\ncriteria for a given neural model and learning task. We also find a non-linear\\nrelationship between training stopping criteria, training Efficiency, model\\nsize, and training Efficiency. Furthermore, we illustrate the potential confounding effects of overtraining\\non measuring the training efficiency of a neural architecture. Regarding\\nrelative training efficiency across different architectures, our results\\nindicate that CNNs are more efficient than BCNNs on both datasets. More\\ngenerally, as a learning task becomes more complex, the relative difference in\\ntraining efficiency between different architectures becomes more pronounced.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Machine Learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Machine Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07925\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Machine Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

衡量神经网络系统开发的效率是一个尚未解决的研究问题。本文提出了一个测量神经架构训练效率的实验框架。为了证明我们的方法,我们分析了卷积神经网络和贝叶斯等效网络在 MNIST 和 CIFAR-10 任务上的训练效率。我们的结果表明,训练效率会随着训练的进行而下降,并且在给定神经模型和学习任务的不同停止标准下也会有所不同。我们还发现训练停止标准、训练效率、模型大小和训练效率之间存在非线性关系。此外,我们还说明了过度训练对衡量神经架构训练效率的潜在干扰效应。关于不同架构的相对训练效率,我们的结果表明,在两个数据集上,CNN 比 BCNN 更有效率。一般来说,随着学习任务变得越来越复杂,不同架构之间训练效率的相对差异也会越来越明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A framework for measuring the training efficiency of a neural architecture
Measuring Efficiency in neural network system development is an open research problem. This paper presents an experimental framework to measure the training efficiency of a neural architecture. To demonstrate our approach, we analyze the training efficiency of Convolutional Neural Networks and Bayesian equivalents on the MNIST and CIFAR-10 tasks. Our results show that training efficiency decays as training progresses and varies across different stopping criteria for a given neural model and learning task. We also find a non-linear relationship between training stopping criteria, training Efficiency, model size, and training Efficiency. Furthermore, we illustrate the potential confounding effects of overtraining on measuring the training efficiency of a neural architecture. Regarding relative training efficiency across different architectures, our results indicate that CNNs are more efficient than BCNNs on both datasets. More generally, as a learning task becomes more complex, the relative difference in training efficiency between different architectures becomes more pronounced.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Almost Sure Convergence of Linear Temporal Difference Learning with Arbitrary Features The Impact of Element Ordering on LM Agent Performance Towards Interpretable End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Prediction: Utilizing Administrative Claims Data with Explainable AI Techniques Extended Deep Submodular Functions Symmetry-Enriched Learning: A Category-Theoretic Framework for Robust Machine Learning Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1