从帝国到人类世:贝蒂-约瑟夫的《后历史时代的小说》(评论)

IF 0.5 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE STUDIES IN THE NOVEL Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1353/sdn.2024.a935477
Anne Stewart
{"title":"从帝国到人类世:贝蒂-约瑟夫的《后历史时代的小说》(评论)","authors":"Anne Stewart","doi":"10.1353/sdn.2024.a935477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>From Empire to Anthropocene: The Novel in Posthistorical Times</em> by Betty Joseph <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Anne Stewart </li> </ul> JOSEPH, BETTY. <em>From Empire to Anthropocene: The Novel in Posthistorical Times</em>. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2023. 235 pp. $114.95 hardcover; $34.95 paperback; $34.95 e-book. <p>Betty Joseph's <em>From Empire to Anthropocene</em> is driven by a provocative premise: literary and critical theory, particularly as it is engaged with questions of globality and globalization, pays a lot of attention to space, but what if we paid more attention to time? Joseph's introduction makes a case for a critical reorientation toward temporal axes: in a present moment marked by geopolitical and ecological strife, what we encounter again and again are contests over not so much what time it is, but whose time? Joseph calls this the force of \"chronopolitics,\" captured in rhetorical contests such as those embedded in the Trump campaign slogan: \"Make America Great <em>Again</em>\" (for whom? since when?), and in the race to <em>slow</em> the Covid-19 pandemic (the speed of the virus a temporality at odds with the speed of global flows). Joseph identifies contests over temporality as increasingly definitive of a ruptured or \"uneven\" contemporaneity that challenges conceptions of globality and of how we understand contemporary literature. What timeline is this? To whom does it belong? To whom (and to when) does the future belong? The project asks readers to think about how novelistic narration of lived experience cuts across multiple different timelines, presenting \"a conflict over time\" (151) that challenges theorists with perhaps greater questions of unevenness than those already offered by geo-critical theories of the spatial.</p> <p>The book's title, which does not mention globalization or temporality, can best be understood as tracking our shifting understandings of globalization, first as the expansion of colonial empires and the creation of a capitalist world system, and then as a world remade <strong>[End Page 327]</strong> two times over into a problem of planetarity posed by anthropogenic climate change. Across five chapters, Joseph takes us from postcolonialist considerations of \"migrant temporality\" (57), to retheorizations of Manuel Castells's network society and the neoliberal global marketplace via the \"bumps, delays, and lags\" that trouble the smooth operations of global flows (97), and finally to the time of global environmental crisis. Each chapter is theoretically dense as it takes up a different complex of temporalities, critical concepts, and rhetorical figures used by the novels under investigation. The final chapter, for example, looks at the temporality of environmental change as it operates through the assemblages found in the proleptic descriptive work in Barbara Kingsolver's <em>Flight Behavior</em>. What is produced through such a reading practice, Joseph argues, is a \"temporality of uncertainty\" (195) that offers the reader a sense of agency in imagining futures not necessarily doomed by climate change but opening up into the very possibilities of difference produced by the contingencies and uncertainties of climate crisis timelines.</p> <p>The progression of the argument from Empire to Anthropocene also moves from considerations of the ways in which the past, to evoke Faulkner's famous line, is not even past, to the ways in which the future is pulled into the present by the time-annihilating force of market speculation. The first two chapters, \"Spectres\" and \"Attachments,\" address Joseph's opening assertion that \"the rich body of transnational Anglophone fiction…reorients contemporary literature\" (5) by bringing \"the durabilities of the colonial past in(to) the present\" (30). Through readings of the historical and affective temporalities in Jamaica Kinkaid's <em>Lucy</em> and Teju Cole's <em>Open City</em>, Joseph considers the pressures that such timelines place on being (in the) present and on conceptions of national time and familial and civic belonging. Scholars of the transatlantic slave trade and the legacy of Indigenous genocide in the Americas will find much that is familiar here on the force of history as it shapes politico-national and spatial orders. The strength of Joseph's theoretical gambit comes across most persuasively through the addition of temporal layering to the spatial palimpsests that are typically found in readings of urban fiction such as <em>Open City</em>, offering a fresh understanding of migrant subjectivity shaped by \"heterotemporalities\" \"crowding each other...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":54138,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Empire to Anthropocene: The Novel in Posthistorical Times by Betty Joseph (review)\",\"authors\":\"Anne Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/sdn.2024.a935477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>From Empire to Anthropocene: The Novel in Posthistorical Times</em> by Betty Joseph <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Anne Stewart </li> </ul> JOSEPH, BETTY. <em>From Empire to Anthropocene: The Novel in Posthistorical Times</em>. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2023. 235 pp. $114.95 hardcover; $34.95 paperback; $34.95 e-book. <p>Betty Joseph's <em>From Empire to Anthropocene</em> is driven by a provocative premise: literary and critical theory, particularly as it is engaged with questions of globality and globalization, pays a lot of attention to space, but what if we paid more attention to time? Joseph's introduction makes a case for a critical reorientation toward temporal axes: in a present moment marked by geopolitical and ecological strife, what we encounter again and again are contests over not so much what time it is, but whose time? Joseph calls this the force of \\\"chronopolitics,\\\" captured in rhetorical contests such as those embedded in the Trump campaign slogan: \\\"Make America Great <em>Again</em>\\\" (for whom? since when?), and in the race to <em>slow</em> the Covid-19 pandemic (the speed of the virus a temporality at odds with the speed of global flows). Joseph identifies contests over temporality as increasingly definitive of a ruptured or \\\"uneven\\\" contemporaneity that challenges conceptions of globality and of how we understand contemporary literature. What timeline is this? To whom does it belong? To whom (and to when) does the future belong? The project asks readers to think about how novelistic narration of lived experience cuts across multiple different timelines, presenting \\\"a conflict over time\\\" (151) that challenges theorists with perhaps greater questions of unevenness than those already offered by geo-critical theories of the spatial.</p> <p>The book's title, which does not mention globalization or temporality, can best be understood as tracking our shifting understandings of globalization, first as the expansion of colonial empires and the creation of a capitalist world system, and then as a world remade <strong>[End Page 327]</strong> two times over into a problem of planetarity posed by anthropogenic climate change. Across five chapters, Joseph takes us from postcolonialist considerations of \\\"migrant temporality\\\" (57), to retheorizations of Manuel Castells's network society and the neoliberal global marketplace via the \\\"bumps, delays, and lags\\\" that trouble the smooth operations of global flows (97), and finally to the time of global environmental crisis. Each chapter is theoretically dense as it takes up a different complex of temporalities, critical concepts, and rhetorical figures used by the novels under investigation. The final chapter, for example, looks at the temporality of environmental change as it operates through the assemblages found in the proleptic descriptive work in Barbara Kingsolver's <em>Flight Behavior</em>. What is produced through such a reading practice, Joseph argues, is a \\\"temporality of uncertainty\\\" (195) that offers the reader a sense of agency in imagining futures not necessarily doomed by climate change but opening up into the very possibilities of difference produced by the contingencies and uncertainties of climate crisis timelines.</p> <p>The progression of the argument from Empire to Anthropocene also moves from considerations of the ways in which the past, to evoke Faulkner's famous line, is not even past, to the ways in which the future is pulled into the present by the time-annihilating force of market speculation. The first two chapters, \\\"Spectres\\\" and \\\"Attachments,\\\" address Joseph's opening assertion that \\\"the rich body of transnational Anglophone fiction…reorients contemporary literature\\\" (5) by bringing \\\"the durabilities of the colonial past in(to) the present\\\" (30). Through readings of the historical and affective temporalities in Jamaica Kinkaid's <em>Lucy</em> and Teju Cole's <em>Open City</em>, Joseph considers the pressures that such timelines place on being (in the) present and on conceptions of national time and familial and civic belonging. Scholars of the transatlantic slave trade and the legacy of Indigenous genocide in the Americas will find much that is familiar here on the force of history as it shapes politico-national and spatial orders. The strength of Joseph's theoretical gambit comes across most persuasively through the addition of temporal layering to the spatial palimpsests that are typically found in readings of urban fiction such as <em>Open City</em>, offering a fresh understanding of migrant subjectivity shaped by \\\"heterotemporalities\\\" \\\"crowding each other...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2024.a935477\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2024.a935477","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: 从帝国到人类世:贝蒂-约瑟夫-安妮-斯图尔特《后历史时代的小说》 JOSEPH, BETTY.从帝国到人类世:后历史时代的小说》。巴尔的摩:约翰-霍普金斯大学出版社,2023 年。235 页。精装本 114.95 美元;平装本 34.95 美元;电子书 34.95 美元。贝蒂-约瑟夫(Betty Joseph)的《从帝国到人类世》一书由一个具有启发性的前提所驱动:文学和批评理论,尤其是涉及全球性和全球化问题的理论,对空间给予了大量关注,但如果我们对时间给予更多关注呢?约瑟夫在导言中提出了重新调整批评方向,以时间为轴心的理由:在地缘政治和生态纷争不断的当下,我们一再遇到的不是 "现在是什么时间 "的争论,而是 "谁的时间 "的争论?约瑟夫将此称为 "时间政治学 "的力量,它体现在修辞上的较量,如特朗普竞选口号 "让美国再次伟大"(为谁而伟大? 从何时开始?约瑟夫认为,对时间性的争论日益成为断裂或 "不均衡 "当代性的定论,这对全球性概念以及我们如何理解当代文学提出了挑战。这是一条怎样的时间线?它属于谁?未来属于谁(以及何时属于谁)?该项目要求读者思考小说对生活经验的叙述如何跨越多条不同的时间线,呈现出 "时间上的冲突"(151),向理论家们提出了可能比空间地理批判理论所提出的更大的不均衡性问题。该书的标题没有提及全球化或时间性,但可以最好地理解为追踪我们对全球化的理解的变化,首先是殖民帝国的扩张和资本主义世界体系的建立,然后是世界的两次重塑 [尾页 327],成为人类活动引起的气候变化所带来的地球性问题。在五个章节中,约瑟夫带领我们从 "移民时间性 "的后殖民主义思考(57),到曼努埃尔-卡斯特尔斯(Manuel Castells)的网络社会和新自由主义全球市场的再理论化(97),这些 "颠簸、延迟和滞后 "给全球流动的平稳运行带来了麻烦(97),最后到全球环境危机时期。每一章的理论密度都很高,因为它涉及到所研究的小说所使用的不同的时间性、批判性概念和修辞手法。例如,最后一章探讨了环境变化的时间性,因为它是通过芭芭拉-金索弗的《飞行行为》中的前奏性描述作品中的集合体来运作的。约瑟夫认为,通过这种阅读实践产生的是一种 "不确定性的时间性"(195),它为读者提供了一种代入感,让读者想象未来不一定是气候变化注定的,而是在气候危机时间线的偶然性和不确定性所产生的差异的可能性中敞开大门。从 "帝国 "到 "人类世 "的论证过程也从对过去的思考(引用福克纳的名言)转向对未来如何被市场投机的时间湮灭力量拉入当下的思考。前两章 "幽灵 "和 "附着物 "论述了约瑟夫开篇的论断,即 "丰富的跨国英语小说......通过将'殖民过去的持久性带入(到)现在'(30),重新确定了当代文学的方向"(5)。通过对牙买加-金凯德(Jamaica Kinkaid)的《露西》(Lucy)和特朱-科尔(Teju Cole)的《开放之城》(Open City)中的历史和情感时间性的解读,约瑟夫思考了这些时间线对(身处)当下以及对国家时间概念、家庭和公民归属感所造成的压力。研究跨大西洋奴隶贸易和美洲原住民种族灭绝遗留问题的学者会发现,历史的力量塑造了政治-国家和空间秩序,他们在这里可以找到很多熟悉的内容。约瑟夫在理论上的优势体现在将《开放城市》(Open City)等城市小说中常见的空间拼贴法加入了时间分层,从而对 "异时性""相互挤压 "所形成的移民主体性有了全新的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From Empire to Anthropocene: The Novel in Posthistorical Times by Betty Joseph (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • From Empire to Anthropocene: The Novel in Posthistorical Times by Betty Joseph
  • Anne Stewart
JOSEPH, BETTY. From Empire to Anthropocene: The Novel in Posthistorical Times. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2023. 235 pp. $114.95 hardcover; $34.95 paperback; $34.95 e-book.

Betty Joseph's From Empire to Anthropocene is driven by a provocative premise: literary and critical theory, particularly as it is engaged with questions of globality and globalization, pays a lot of attention to space, but what if we paid more attention to time? Joseph's introduction makes a case for a critical reorientation toward temporal axes: in a present moment marked by geopolitical and ecological strife, what we encounter again and again are contests over not so much what time it is, but whose time? Joseph calls this the force of "chronopolitics," captured in rhetorical contests such as those embedded in the Trump campaign slogan: "Make America Great Again" (for whom? since when?), and in the race to slow the Covid-19 pandemic (the speed of the virus a temporality at odds with the speed of global flows). Joseph identifies contests over temporality as increasingly definitive of a ruptured or "uneven" contemporaneity that challenges conceptions of globality and of how we understand contemporary literature. What timeline is this? To whom does it belong? To whom (and to when) does the future belong? The project asks readers to think about how novelistic narration of lived experience cuts across multiple different timelines, presenting "a conflict over time" (151) that challenges theorists with perhaps greater questions of unevenness than those already offered by geo-critical theories of the spatial.

The book's title, which does not mention globalization or temporality, can best be understood as tracking our shifting understandings of globalization, first as the expansion of colonial empires and the creation of a capitalist world system, and then as a world remade [End Page 327] two times over into a problem of planetarity posed by anthropogenic climate change. Across five chapters, Joseph takes us from postcolonialist considerations of "migrant temporality" (57), to retheorizations of Manuel Castells's network society and the neoliberal global marketplace via the "bumps, delays, and lags" that trouble the smooth operations of global flows (97), and finally to the time of global environmental crisis. Each chapter is theoretically dense as it takes up a different complex of temporalities, critical concepts, and rhetorical figures used by the novels under investigation. The final chapter, for example, looks at the temporality of environmental change as it operates through the assemblages found in the proleptic descriptive work in Barbara Kingsolver's Flight Behavior. What is produced through such a reading practice, Joseph argues, is a "temporality of uncertainty" (195) that offers the reader a sense of agency in imagining futures not necessarily doomed by climate change but opening up into the very possibilities of difference produced by the contingencies and uncertainties of climate crisis timelines.

The progression of the argument from Empire to Anthropocene also moves from considerations of the ways in which the past, to evoke Faulkner's famous line, is not even past, to the ways in which the future is pulled into the present by the time-annihilating force of market speculation. The first two chapters, "Spectres" and "Attachments," address Joseph's opening assertion that "the rich body of transnational Anglophone fiction…reorients contemporary literature" (5) by bringing "the durabilities of the colonial past in(to) the present" (30). Through readings of the historical and affective temporalities in Jamaica Kinkaid's Lucy and Teju Cole's Open City, Joseph considers the pressures that such timelines place on being (in the) present and on conceptions of national time and familial and civic belonging. Scholars of the transatlantic slave trade and the legacy of Indigenous genocide in the Americas will find much that is familiar here on the force of history as it shapes politico-national and spatial orders. The strength of Joseph's theoretical gambit comes across most persuasively through the addition of temporal layering to the spatial palimpsests that are typically found in readings of urban fiction such as Open City, offering a fresh understanding of migrant subjectivity shaped by "heterotemporalities" "crowding each other...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
STUDIES IN THE NOVEL
STUDIES IN THE NOVEL LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: From its inception, Studies in the Novel has been dedicated to building a scholarly community around the world-making potentialities of the novel. Studies in the Novel started as an idea among several members of the English Department of the University of North Texas during the summer of 1965. They determined that there was a need for a journal “devoted to publishing critical and scholarly articles on the novel with no restrictions on either chronology or nationality of the novelists studied.” The founding editor, University of North Texas professor of contemporary literature James W. Lee, envisioned a journal of international scope and influence. Since then, Studies in the Novel has staked its reputation upon publishing incisive scholarship on the canon-forming and cutting-edge novelists that have shaped the genre’s rich history. The journal continues to break new ground by promoting new theoretical approaches, a broader international scope, and an engagement with the contemporary novel as a form of social critique.
期刊最新文献
"I wouldn't trust that map": Fraudulent Geographies in Late Victorian Lost World Novels Swallowing the Whole: World, Planet, and Totality in the Planetary Fiction of H. G. Wells Dreaming of Manderley: Individualism, Aging, and the Novel A Cursed Circle: Confronting Patriarchal and Colonizing Legacies in Silvia Moreno-Garcia's Mexican Gothic Dislocating the Language of Modernity in Amitav Ghosh's The Circle of Reason
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1