首页 > 最新文献

STUDIES IN THE NOVEL最新文献

英文 中文
Planetary Pynchon: History, Modernity, and the Anthropocene by Tore Rye Andersen (review) 行星品钦:历史、现代性与人类世》,作者 Tore Rye Andersen(评论)
IF 0.2 2区 文学 N/A LITERATURE Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.1353/sdn.2024.a935475
Patrick Whitmarsh
<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span><p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Planetary Pynchon: History, Modernity, and the Anthropocene</em> by Tore Rye Andersen <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Patrick Whitmarsh </li> </ul> ANDERSEN, TORE RYE. <em>Planetary Pynchon: History, Modernity, and the Anthropocene</em>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023. 228 pp. $110.00 hardcover. <p>Those of us in the niche subfield of Pynchon studies—Pynheads, if you please—have long debated the inner order or logic that governs the author's inimitable corpus. In <em>Planetary Pynchon: History, Modernity, and the Anthropocene</em>, Tore Rye Andersen deals a massive hand to this critical gambit, structured around extensive readings and contextual analyses of Pynchon's three most substantial works: <em>Gravity's Rainbow</em> (1973), <em>Mason & Dixon</em> (1997), and <em>Against the Day</em> (2006). Treating these works as "one coherent megatext" (20), Andersen argues for Pynchon as a writer of what we might call the global process of modernity—a protracted history from the rise of capitalism to World War II. Hardly a history of incremental progress, Pynchon's vision channels the "dark side of the growth scenarios of modernity" (11), the subtractions, negations, and depletions that make possible an ideology of Euro-American supremacy. Erecting a conceptual bridge from the colonial and imperial discourses that inform modern global capitalism to the critical environmentalisms that make up the growing field of Anthropocene studies, Andersen delivers an ambitiously conceived and deeply rewarding analysis of one the most important American novelists of the post−World War II era.</p> <p>In a broad sense, <em>Planetary Pynchon</em> pushes through and beyond foundational postmodernist and historiographic readings of the author by such critics as David Cowart, Linda Hutcheon, and Brian McHale, yet does so in a way that builds on this earlier work. Reading Pynchon at the planetary scale, Andersen underscores the way the author's global novels highlight and even formally embody the contingency of historical development: "in historical nodal points like those depicted in Pynchon's world-historical novels, we are rather faced with a multiplexity of possible paths, none of which seem to lead to any safety" (48). Paired with an Anthropocene environmentalism, Andersen's emphasis finds rejuvenated meaning. The unnumbered and ever-dividing potentialities that perpetually regenerate across human history mirror the complex array of biophysical feedback loops that unspool over planetary time. As Andersen's argument goes, Pynchon's global trilogy clarifies the correlation between these scales: the "world-historical depiction of the forceful spread of modernity across the globe is also the story of the growth of the Anthropocene" (161).</p> <p>Andersen develops his argument by moving through Pynchon's nov
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 行星品钦:历史、现代性与人类世》,作者:托尔-赖伊-安德森-帕特里克-惠特马什 安德森,托尔-赖伊。行星品钦:历史、现代性与人类世》。剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2023 年。228 pp.精装本 110.00 美元。长期以来,我们这些从事品钦研究这一细分领域工作的人--如果你愿意的话,可以称为 "品头族"--一直在争论支配这位作家无与伦比的作品的内在秩序或逻辑。在《行星品钦:历史、现代性与人类世》(Planetary Pynchon: History, Modernity, and the Anthropocene)一书中,托尔-雷伊-安德森(Tore Rye Andersen)对这一批判性的博弈进行了大量的论述,对品钦的三部最重要的作品进行了广泛的解读和背景分析:重力之虹》(Gravity's Rainbow,1973 年)、《梅森与迪克森》(Mason & Dixon,1997 年)和《逆天》(Against the Day,2006 年)。安德森将这些作品视为 "一个连贯的巨型文本"(20),认为品钦是我们可以称之为全球现代进程的作家--从资本主义兴起到第二次世界大战的漫长历史。品钦的视野并不是一部循序渐进的历史,而是 "现代性增长情景的阴暗面"(11),即减法、否定和损耗,这使得欧美至上的意识形态成为可能。安德森在概念上架起了一座桥梁,从为现代全球资本主义提供信息的殖民主义和帝国主义话语,到构成日益壮大的 "人类世 "研究领域的批判性环境主义,他对二战后美国最重要的小说家之一进行了雄心勃勃的构思和深入有益的分析。从广义上讲,《行星品钦》推动并超越了大卫-考瓦特、琳达-胡琴和布赖恩-麦克黑尔等评论家对作者的后现代主义和历史学基础性解读,同时又在这些早期作品的基础上进行了创新。安德森从地球尺度解读品钦,强调了作者的全球小说是如何突出甚至正式体现历史发展的偶然性的:"在品钦的世界历史小说所描绘的历史节点上,我们面临着多种可能的道路,但似乎没有一条是安全的"(48)。与 "人类世 "环境主义相结合,安徒生所强调的意义焕然一新。在人类历史中不断再生的、不计其数的、不断分裂的潜能,反映了在地球时间内不断发展的一系列复杂的生物物理反馈回路。正如安德森所言,品钦的全球三部曲阐明了这些尺度之间的关联:"对现代性在全球范围内强势传播的世界历史描绘,也是人类世成长的故事"(161)。安德森在展开论述时,不是按照出版顺序,而是按照小说所处时代的时间顺序来阅读品钦的小说:十八世纪(《梅森与迪克森》)、二十世纪之交(《逆天》)和二十世纪中期(《万有引力之虹》)。尽管采用了这种编排方式,但各章节 [尾页 323]并没有只关注主要文本,而是将所有三部小说放在一起进行讨论。这是本书的优点;安徒生的对话结构使读者更容易理解小说之间的实质性联系。也许更重要的是,这种结构揭示了三部全球小说在多大程度上是品钦数十年创作计划的一部分。考虑到品钦不可能在《万有引力之虹》出版时(如果不是更早的话)就已经掌握了其巨型文本的全部范围,读者对这一说法的怀疑是可以原谅的。同样值得称赞的是,安徒生在第四章中对这种怀疑做出了回应,该章提供了一部小说的 "另类历史"(129),承认了作者风格的演变以及他对性别和种族等政治问题的处理(后者对于一部如此批判性地关注殖民主义历史的作品来说至关重要)。在这一章中,安徒生承认,即使在他伟大的全球小说中,品钦也会屈服于期望的重压:"在《梅森与迪克逊》(Mason & Dixon)和《逆时针》(Against the Day)中,我们看到了一位完全掌控了自己的媒介的大师所创作的精彩散文;而在《万有引力之虹》中,我们看到的是一种奇特的混合体,它超越了界限,将语言扭曲成新的星座"(147)。值得反复强调的是,早期品钦作品的顶峰为后世建立了一个模板。
{"title":"Planetary Pynchon: History, Modernity, and the Anthropocene by Tore Rye Andersen (review)","authors":"Patrick Whitmarsh","doi":"10.1353/sdn.2024.a935475","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2024.a935475","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;In lieu of&lt;/span&gt; an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:&lt;/span&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt; &lt;span&gt;Reviewed by:&lt;/span&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;!-- html_title --&gt; &lt;em&gt;Planetary Pynchon: History, Modernity, and the Anthropocene&lt;/em&gt; by Tore Rye Andersen &lt;!-- /html_title --&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt; Patrick Whitmarsh &lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt; ANDERSEN, TORE RYE. &lt;em&gt;Planetary Pynchon: History, Modernity, and the Anthropocene&lt;/em&gt;. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023. 228 pp. $110.00 hardcover. &lt;p&gt;Those of us in the niche subfield of Pynchon studies—Pynheads, if you please—have long debated the inner order or logic that governs the author's inimitable corpus. In &lt;em&gt;Planetary Pynchon: History, Modernity, and the Anthropocene&lt;/em&gt;, Tore Rye Andersen deals a massive hand to this critical gambit, structured around extensive readings and contextual analyses of Pynchon's three most substantial works: &lt;em&gt;Gravity's Rainbow&lt;/em&gt; (1973), &lt;em&gt;Mason &amp; Dixon&lt;/em&gt; (1997), and &lt;em&gt;Against the Day&lt;/em&gt; (2006). Treating these works as \"one coherent megatext\" (20), Andersen argues for Pynchon as a writer of what we might call the global process of modernity—a protracted history from the rise of capitalism to World War II. Hardly a history of incremental progress, Pynchon's vision channels the \"dark side of the growth scenarios of modernity\" (11), the subtractions, negations, and depletions that make possible an ideology of Euro-American supremacy. Erecting a conceptual bridge from the colonial and imperial discourses that inform modern global capitalism to the critical environmentalisms that make up the growing field of Anthropocene studies, Andersen delivers an ambitiously conceived and deeply rewarding analysis of one the most important American novelists of the post−World War II era.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In a broad sense, &lt;em&gt;Planetary Pynchon&lt;/em&gt; pushes through and beyond foundational postmodernist and historiographic readings of the author by such critics as David Cowart, Linda Hutcheon, and Brian McHale, yet does so in a way that builds on this earlier work. Reading Pynchon at the planetary scale, Andersen underscores the way the author's global novels highlight and even formally embody the contingency of historical development: \"in historical nodal points like those depicted in Pynchon's world-historical novels, we are rather faced with a multiplexity of possible paths, none of which seem to lead to any safety\" (48). Paired with an Anthropocene environmentalism, Andersen's emphasis finds rejuvenated meaning. The unnumbered and ever-dividing potentialities that perpetually regenerate across human history mirror the complex array of biophysical feedback loops that unspool over planetary time. As Andersen's argument goes, Pynchon's global trilogy clarifies the correlation between these scales: the \"world-historical depiction of the forceful spread of modernity across the globe is also the story of the growth of the Anthropocene\" (161).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Andersen develops his argument by moving through Pynchon's nov","PeriodicalId":54138,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142189726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dreaming of Manderley: Individualism, Aging, and the Novel 梦回曼陀丽:个人主义、老龄化与小说
IF 0.2 2区 文学 N/A LITERATURE Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.1353/sdn.2024.a935472
Laura Schrock Crawford

Abstract:

This essay examines how Daphne du Maurier's 1938 novel Rebecca maps the bildungsroman journey of self-development in youth onto the process of self-decline in age, creating an uncanny structure that forfeits the climactic achievement of an ultimate self as bodied forth by the traditional novel. This ultimate self is a fantasy of Western individualism that reflects its historical devaluation of the limitations of the body and the associated necessity of human interdependence and care. The limited selfhood achieved by the narrator undercuts the individualist ideal of perpetual self-expansion and leaves her haunted by its fantasy of aristocratic power, represented by the Manderley estate and its former mistress, the titular first Mrs. de Winter. The concrete losses attributable to the aging process thus double in Rebecca as the subversion of individualism's ideal.

摘要:本文探讨了达芙妮-杜穆里埃 1938 年创作的小说《丽贝卡》如何将青春期自我成长的童话历程映射到老年期自我衰落的过程中,从而创造出一种不可思议的结构,放弃了传统小说中终极自我的高潮成就。这种终极自我是西方个人主义的幻想,反映了西方个人主义在历史上对身体局限性的贬低,以及与此相关的人类相互依存和关怀的必要性。叙述者实现的有限自我削弱了个人主义永久自我扩张的理想,使她被以曼陀丽庄园及其前女主人--名义上的第一任德温特太太--为代表的贵族权力幻想所困扰。因此,在《丽贝卡》中,衰老过程带来的具体损失是对个人主义理想的双重颠覆。
{"title":"Dreaming of Manderley: Individualism, Aging, and the Novel","authors":"Laura Schrock Crawford","doi":"10.1353/sdn.2024.a935472","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2024.a935472","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>This essay examines how Daphne du Maurier's 1938 novel <i>Rebecca</i> maps the <i>bildungsroman</i> journey of self-development in youth onto the process of self-decline in age, creating an uncanny structure that forfeits the climactic achievement of an ultimate self as bodied forth by the traditional novel. This ultimate self is a fantasy of Western individualism that reflects its historical devaluation of the limitations of the body and the associated necessity of human interdependence and care. The limited selfhood achieved by the narrator undercuts the individualist ideal of perpetual self-expansion and leaves her haunted by its fantasy of aristocratic power, represented by the Manderley estate and its former mistress, the titular first Mrs. de Winter. The concrete losses attributable to the aging process thus double in <i>Rebecca</i> as the subversion of individualism's ideal.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":54138,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142189722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Cursed Circle: Confronting Patriarchal and Colonizing Legacies in Silvia Moreno-Garcia's Mexican Gothic 被诅咒的圆圈》:在西尔维娅-莫雷诺-加西亚的墨西哥哥特式作品中对抗父权制和殖民化遗产
IF 0.2 2区 文学 N/A LITERATURE Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.1353/sdn.2024.a935474
Alejandra Ortega

Abstract:

In Silvia Moreno-Garcia's Mexican Gothic (2020), the Doyle family home of High Place is a living, breathing structure. The home indelibly retains memories of dead women within its walls that it uses to communicate with the novel's protagonist, Noemí Taboada. Moreno-Garcia uses this supernatural home to address legacies of violence against women and minorities by staging the colonizer-colonized relationship for Noemí in areas of the home that are typically viewed as feminine or private, intimate spaces. She furthers this discussion by reshaping a typically European genre for a new audience while critically examining a contentious period of Mexico's history. Through an intersection of spatial theory, postcolonial theory, and ecocriticism, this essay analyzes the way Moreno-Garcia constructs a haunting domestic space to confront patriarchal and colonizing legacies that are often suppressed in cultural and literary memory.

摘要:在西尔维娅-莫雷诺-加西亚(Silvia Moreno-Garcia)的《墨西哥哥特式》(2020 年)中,多尔家的住宅 "高地 "是一个活生生的建筑。这座房子的墙壁上不可磨灭地留存着死去女性的记忆,并通过这些记忆与小说主人公诺埃米-塔博达(Noemí Taboada)进行交流。莫雷诺-加西亚利用这座超自然的住宅,在通常被视为女性或私人、私密空间的地方为诺埃米上演了殖民者与被殖民者之间的关系,从而探讨了暴力侵害妇女和少数民族的遗留问题。她为新的观众重新塑造了一个典型的欧洲类型,同时批判性地审视了墨西哥历史上一个充满争议的时期,从而进一步推动了这一讨论。通过空间理论、后殖民理论和生态批评的交叉,本文分析了莫雷诺-加西亚如何构建一个令人魂牵梦萦的家庭空间,以对抗在文化和文学记忆中经常被压制的父权制和殖民化遗产。
{"title":"A Cursed Circle: Confronting Patriarchal and Colonizing Legacies in Silvia Moreno-Garcia's Mexican Gothic","authors":"Alejandra Ortega","doi":"10.1353/sdn.2024.a935474","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2024.a935474","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>In Silvia Moreno-Garcia's <i>Mexican Gothic</i> (2020), the Doyle family home of High Place is a living, breathing structure. The home indelibly retains memories of dead women within its walls that it uses to communicate with the novel's protagonist, Noemí Taboada. Moreno-Garcia uses this supernatural home to address legacies of violence against women and minorities by staging the colonizer-colonized relationship for Noemí in areas of the home that are typically viewed as feminine or private, intimate spaces. She furthers this discussion by reshaping a typically European genre for a new audience while critically examining a contentious period of Mexico's history. Through an intersection of spatial theory, postcolonial theory, and ecocriticism, this essay analyzes the way Moreno-Garcia constructs a haunting domestic space to confront patriarchal and colonizing legacies that are often suppressed in cultural and literary memory.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":54138,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142189723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dislocating the Language of Modernity in Amitav Ghosh's The Circle of Reason 阿米塔夫-高什《理性之圈》中的现代性语言错位
IF 0.2 2区 文学 N/A LITERATURE Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.1353/sdn.2024.a935473
Derek Ettensohn

Abstract:

Engaging with Amitav Ghosh's recent essays that link imperial modernity's mechanistic view of the world to the novel's failure to imagine climate change, this article examines how Ghosh's fiction attempts to dislocate narratives of modernity to reveal a world constructed by capital and naturalized through reason. Drawing on the work of postcolonial theorists on the introduction of Western science to India, this article returns to Ghosh's first novel, The Circle of Reason, to focus on the intimate scale of the transformations that imperial modernity enacted on the human body and psyche. Though underrepresented in scholarship on Ghosh, this novel is a critical site for understanding Ghosh's view of how the ideology of modernity gets entrenched as scientific reason, reshaping humankind's relationship with the human body and the surrounding world. The novel's representation of the body, moreover, proposes an intimate and uncanny space that discloses alternative ways of imagining the world.

摘要:阿米塔夫-戈什(Amitav Ghosh)最近发表文章,将帝国现代性的机械主义世界观与小说未能想象的气候变化联系起来,本文探讨了戈什的小说如何试图将现代性叙述错位,以揭示一个由资本构建并通过理性自然化的世界。本文借鉴了后殖民主义理论家关于西方科学传入印度的研究成果,回到戈什的第一部小说《理性的圆圈》,关注帝国现代性对人类身体和心理所造成的亲密规模的改变。虽然这部小说在研究戈什的学术著作中代表性不足,但它是了解戈什如何将现代性意识形态固化为科学理性、重塑人类与人体及周围世界关系的重要场所。此外,小说对身体的表现提出了一个亲密而不可思议的空间,揭示了想象世界的另一种方式。
{"title":"Dislocating the Language of Modernity in Amitav Ghosh's The Circle of Reason","authors":"Derek Ettensohn","doi":"10.1353/sdn.2024.a935473","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2024.a935473","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>Engaging with Amitav Ghosh's recent essays that link imperial modernity's mechanistic view of the world to the novel's failure to imagine climate change, this article examines how Ghosh's fiction attempts to dislocate narratives of modernity to reveal a world constructed by capital and naturalized through reason. Drawing on the work of postcolonial theorists on the introduction of Western science to India, this article returns to Ghosh's first novel, <i>The Circle of Reason</i>, to focus on the intimate scale of the transformations that imperial modernity enacted on the human body and psyche. Though underrepresented in scholarship on Ghosh, this novel is a critical site for understanding Ghosh's view of how the ideology of modernity gets entrenched as scientific reason, reshaping humankind's relationship with the human body and the surrounding world. The novel's representation of the body, moreover, proposes an intimate and uncanny space that discloses alternative ways of imagining the world.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":54138,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142189725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From Empire to Anthropocene: The Novel in Posthistorical Times by Betty Joseph (review) 从帝国到人类世:贝蒂-约瑟夫的《后历史时代的小说》(评论)
IF 0.2 2区 文学 N/A LITERATURE Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.1353/sdn.2024.a935477
Anne Stewart
<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span><p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>From Empire to Anthropocene: The Novel in Posthistorical Times</em> by Betty Joseph <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Anne Stewart </li> </ul> JOSEPH, BETTY. <em>From Empire to Anthropocene: The Novel in Posthistorical Times</em>. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2023. 235 pp. $114.95 hardcover; $34.95 paperback; $34.95 e-book. <p>Betty Joseph's <em>From Empire to Anthropocene</em> is driven by a provocative premise: literary and critical theory, particularly as it is engaged with questions of globality and globalization, pays a lot of attention to space, but what if we paid more attention to time? Joseph's introduction makes a case for a critical reorientation toward temporal axes: in a present moment marked by geopolitical and ecological strife, what we encounter again and again are contests over not so much what time it is, but whose time? Joseph calls this the force of "chronopolitics," captured in rhetorical contests such as those embedded in the Trump campaign slogan: "Make America Great <em>Again</em>" (for whom? since when?), and in the race to <em>slow</em> the Covid-19 pandemic (the speed of the virus a temporality at odds with the speed of global flows). Joseph identifies contests over temporality as increasingly definitive of a ruptured or "uneven" contemporaneity that challenges conceptions of globality and of how we understand contemporary literature. What timeline is this? To whom does it belong? To whom (and to when) does the future belong? The project asks readers to think about how novelistic narration of lived experience cuts across multiple different timelines, presenting "a conflict over time" (151) that challenges theorists with perhaps greater questions of unevenness than those already offered by geo-critical theories of the spatial.</p> <p>The book's title, which does not mention globalization or temporality, can best be understood as tracking our shifting understandings of globalization, first as the expansion of colonial empires and the creation of a capitalist world system, and then as a world remade <strong>[End Page 327]</strong> two times over into a problem of planetarity posed by anthropogenic climate change. Across five chapters, Joseph takes us from postcolonialist considerations of "migrant temporality" (57), to retheorizations of Manuel Castells's network society and the neoliberal global marketplace via the "bumps, delays, and lags" that trouble the smooth operations of global flows (97), and finally to the time of global environmental crisis. Each chapter is theoretically dense as it takes up a different complex of temporalities, critical concepts, and rhetorical figures used by the novels under investigation. The final chapter, for example, looks at the temporality of environmental change as it operates through the assemblages found in the proleptic d
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: 从帝国到人类世:贝蒂-约瑟夫-安妮-斯图尔特《后历史时代的小说》 JOSEPH, BETTY.从帝国到人类世:后历史时代的小说》。巴尔的摩:约翰-霍普金斯大学出版社,2023 年。235 页。精装本 114.95 美元;平装本 34.95 美元;电子书 34.95 美元。贝蒂-约瑟夫(Betty Joseph)的《从帝国到人类世》一书由一个具有启发性的前提所驱动:文学和批评理论,尤其是涉及全球性和全球化问题的理论,对空间给予了大量关注,但如果我们对时间给予更多关注呢?约瑟夫在导言中提出了重新调整批评方向,以时间为轴心的理由:在地缘政治和生态纷争不断的当下,我们一再遇到的不是 "现在是什么时间 "的争论,而是 "谁的时间 "的争论?约瑟夫将此称为 "时间政治学 "的力量,它体现在修辞上的较量,如特朗普竞选口号 "让美国再次伟大"(为谁而伟大? 从何时开始?约瑟夫认为,对时间性的争论日益成为断裂或 "不均衡 "当代性的定论,这对全球性概念以及我们如何理解当代文学提出了挑战。这是一条怎样的时间线?它属于谁?未来属于谁(以及何时属于谁)?该项目要求读者思考小说对生活经验的叙述如何跨越多条不同的时间线,呈现出 "时间上的冲突"(151),向理论家们提出了可能比空间地理批判理论所提出的更大的不均衡性问题。该书的标题没有提及全球化或时间性,但可以最好地理解为追踪我们对全球化的理解的变化,首先是殖民帝国的扩张和资本主义世界体系的建立,然后是世界的两次重塑 [尾页 327],成为人类活动引起的气候变化所带来的地球性问题。在五个章节中,约瑟夫带领我们从 "移民时间性 "的后殖民主义思考(57),到曼努埃尔-卡斯特尔斯(Manuel Castells)的网络社会和新自由主义全球市场的再理论化(97),这些 "颠簸、延迟和滞后 "给全球流动的平稳运行带来了麻烦(97),最后到全球环境危机时期。每一章的理论密度都很高,因为它涉及到所研究的小说所使用的不同的时间性、批判性概念和修辞手法。例如,最后一章探讨了环境变化的时间性,因为它是通过芭芭拉-金索弗的《飞行行为》中的前奏性描述作品中的集合体来运作的。约瑟夫认为,通过这种阅读实践产生的是一种 "不确定性的时间性"(195),它为读者提供了一种代入感,让读者想象未来不一定是气候变化注定的,而是在气候危机时间线的偶然性和不确定性所产生的差异的可能性中敞开大门。从 "帝国 "到 "人类世 "的论证过程也从对过去的思考(引用福克纳的名言)转向对未来如何被市场投机的时间湮灭力量拉入当下的思考。前两章 "幽灵 "和 "附着物 "论述了约瑟夫开篇的论断,即 "丰富的跨国英语小说......通过将'殖民过去的持久性带入(到)现在'(30),重新确定了当代文学的方向"(5)。通过对牙买加-金凯德(Jamaica Kinkaid)的《露西》(Lucy)和特朱-科尔(Teju Cole)的《开放之城》(Open City)中的历史和情感时间性的解读,约瑟夫思考了这些时间线对(身处)当下以及对国家时间概念、家庭和公民归属感所造成的压力。研究跨大西洋奴隶贸易和美洲原住民种族灭绝遗留问题的学者会发现,历史的力量塑造了政治-国家和空间秩序,他们在这里可以找到很多熟悉的内容。约瑟夫在理论上的优势体现在将《开放城市》(Open City)等城市小说中常见的空间拼贴法加入了时间分层,从而对 "异时性""相互挤压 "所形成的移民主体性有了全新的理解。
{"title":"From Empire to Anthropocene: The Novel in Posthistorical Times by Betty Joseph (review)","authors":"Anne Stewart","doi":"10.1353/sdn.2024.a935477","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2024.a935477","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;In lieu of&lt;/span&gt; an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:&lt;/span&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt; &lt;span&gt;Reviewed by:&lt;/span&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;!-- html_title --&gt; &lt;em&gt;From Empire to Anthropocene: The Novel in Posthistorical Times&lt;/em&gt; by Betty Joseph &lt;!-- /html_title --&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt; Anne Stewart &lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt; JOSEPH, BETTY. &lt;em&gt;From Empire to Anthropocene: The Novel in Posthistorical Times&lt;/em&gt;. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2023. 235 pp. $114.95 hardcover; $34.95 paperback; $34.95 e-book. &lt;p&gt;Betty Joseph's &lt;em&gt;From Empire to Anthropocene&lt;/em&gt; is driven by a provocative premise: literary and critical theory, particularly as it is engaged with questions of globality and globalization, pays a lot of attention to space, but what if we paid more attention to time? Joseph's introduction makes a case for a critical reorientation toward temporal axes: in a present moment marked by geopolitical and ecological strife, what we encounter again and again are contests over not so much what time it is, but whose time? Joseph calls this the force of \"chronopolitics,\" captured in rhetorical contests such as those embedded in the Trump campaign slogan: \"Make America Great &lt;em&gt;Again&lt;/em&gt;\" (for whom? since when?), and in the race to &lt;em&gt;slow&lt;/em&gt; the Covid-19 pandemic (the speed of the virus a temporality at odds with the speed of global flows). Joseph identifies contests over temporality as increasingly definitive of a ruptured or \"uneven\" contemporaneity that challenges conceptions of globality and of how we understand contemporary literature. What timeline is this? To whom does it belong? To whom (and to when) does the future belong? The project asks readers to think about how novelistic narration of lived experience cuts across multiple different timelines, presenting \"a conflict over time\" (151) that challenges theorists with perhaps greater questions of unevenness than those already offered by geo-critical theories of the spatial.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The book's title, which does not mention globalization or temporality, can best be understood as tracking our shifting understandings of globalization, first as the expansion of colonial empires and the creation of a capitalist world system, and then as a world remade &lt;strong&gt;[End Page 327]&lt;/strong&gt; two times over into a problem of planetarity posed by anthropogenic climate change. Across five chapters, Joseph takes us from postcolonialist considerations of \"migrant temporality\" (57), to retheorizations of Manuel Castells's network society and the neoliberal global marketplace via the \"bumps, delays, and lags\" that trouble the smooth operations of global flows (97), and finally to the time of global environmental crisis. Each chapter is theoretically dense as it takes up a different complex of temporalities, critical concepts, and rhetorical figures used by the novels under investigation. The final chapter, for example, looks at the temporality of environmental change as it operates through the assemblages found in the proleptic d","PeriodicalId":54138,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142224483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
"I wouldn't trust that map": Fraudulent Geographies in Late Victorian Lost World Novels "我不会相信那张地图":维多利亚晚期失落世界小说中的虚假地理学
IF 0.2 2区 文学 N/A LITERATURE Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.1353/sdn.2024.a935470
Elly Mccausland

Abstract:

This article examines the connection between the late Victorian lost world novel and the fraudulent or flawed maps that frequently punctuate its narratives. Drawing on sociological risk theory, it argues that the model of adventure structuring these texts is one of liminality and 'experiential tension,' and that their fraudulent geographies are a spatial counterpart to this liminal model. They promote an adventure characterized by perpetual potential and possibility, one we might more accurately term 'meta-adventure.' This model was central to both the imperialist enterprise during the late nineteenth century and to the discourse of 'hypothetical masculinity' that helped bolster and uphold it. The problematic geographies of these texts illuminate the ways in which fiction, masculinity, and adventure were mutually productive processes during the fin de siècle, and the ways in which this interrelationship was facilitated, at least in part, by the 'unmapping' of adventurous space.

摘要:本文研究了维多利亚晚期失落世界小说与经常点缀其叙事的欺诈性或有缺陷的地图之间的联系。文章借鉴社会学的风险理论,认为这些文本所构建的冒险模式是一种边缘性和 "体验张力",而其欺诈性地理图则是这种边缘模式的空间对应物。它们提倡一种以永恒的潜力和可能性为特征的冒险,我们可以更准确地称之为'元冒险'。这种模式是 19 世纪末帝国主义事业的核心,也是有助于支持和维护帝国主义的 "假想男性 "话语的核心。这些文本的问题地理学揭示了小说、男性气质和冒险在世纪末是如何相互促进的,以及这种相互关系是如何通过 "揭开 "冒险空间的 "地图 "而得到促进的,至少在一定程度上是这样。
{"title":"\"I wouldn't trust that map\": Fraudulent Geographies in Late Victorian Lost World Novels","authors":"Elly Mccausland","doi":"10.1353/sdn.2024.a935470","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2024.a935470","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>This article examines the connection between the late Victorian lost world novel and the fraudulent or flawed maps that frequently punctuate its narratives. Drawing on sociological risk theory, it argues that the model of adventure structuring these texts is one of liminality and 'experiential tension,' and that their fraudulent geographies are a spatial counterpart to this liminal model. They promote an adventure characterized by perpetual potential and possibility, one we might more accurately term 'meta-adventure.' This model was central to both the imperialist enterprise during the late nineteenth century and to the discourse of 'hypothetical masculinity' that helped bolster and uphold it. The problematic geographies of these texts illuminate the ways in which fiction, masculinity, and adventure were mutually productive processes during the fin de siècle, and the ways in which this interrelationship was facilitated, at least in part, by the 'unmapping' of adventurous space.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":54138,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142189719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Losing the Plot: Film and Feeling in the Modern Novel by Pardis Dabashi (review) 失去情节:现代小说中的电影与情感》,Pardis Dabashi 著(评论)
IF 0.2 2区 文学 N/A LITERATURE Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.1353/sdn.2024.a935476
Seo Hee Im
<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span><p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Losing the Plot: Film and Feeling in the Modern Novel</em> by Pardis Dabashi <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Seo Hee Im </li> </ul> DABASHI, PARDIS. <em>Losing the Plot: Film and Feeling in the Modern Novel</em>. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2023. $30.00 paperback; $99.00 cloth; $29.99 e-book. <p>Pardis Dabashi's <em>Losing the Plot</em> begins in familiar territory: even as manifestos declaimed the need to make it new, actually existing modernist writing remained conflicted about jettisoning plot. After all, plotted narratives were compelling for good reason. They provided "existential promises" (8) by making imaginable nice things like "possessive liberal individualism, heterosexual marriage, and a progressive and teleological view of history" (8). Quickly, though, Dabashi departs for riskier and more hypothetical terrains, into claims about the payoffs of taking seriously the feelings of various writers (as humans) and characters (also, surprisingly, as humans). Often exhilarating and never boring, <em>Losing the Plot</em> is perhaps most valuable as an occasion to reflect on what it means to do criticism, or more specifically, which kinds of evidence we are willing to admit into a reading.</p> <p>Dabashi rightly reminds us that modernist extrications from realist plot must be understood in the context of the rise of Hollywood cinema. For Dabashi, that means understanding the ambivalence that modernist writers would have felt personally. The writers examined—Nella Larsen, Djuna Barnes, and William Faulkner—must have looked on with envy and dismay as film, inheriting plots that modernist fiction abandoned, took over "the cultural, formal, and psychic work of the bourgeois novel" (8). Authorial intent, let alone authorial feeling, is a notoriously tricky thing, and most of us learn in graduate school to avoid contact with it, like Medusa's hair, by keeping our eyes studiously trained on the text. But <em>Losing the Plot</em> engages freely in hypotheses (at the end of each chapter with rhetorical questions) about how authors must have found private comfort in watching films or in identifying with specific actors. Such speculations sometimes fly in the face of historical evidence, as in the case of Faulkner, who, as Jordan Brower has recently shown (<em>Classical Hollywood, American Modernism</em>, Cambridge UP, 2024), nursed public grudges against the Hollywood film industry in general and MGM Studios in particular.</p> <p>A key hypothesis is that once modernist authors got over their ugly feelings, or at least managed them well enough to persist in writing plotless novels, they did so at <strong>[End Page 325]</strong> the expense of their characters. According to this account, modernist novels perpetrate egregious acts of abuse, for the authors who sought the solaces of plot in theater
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 失去情节:现代小说中的电影与情感》,帕迪斯-达巴希 Seo Hee Im 著 达巴希,帕迪斯。Losing the Plot: Film and Feeling in the Modern Novel.芝加哥:芝加哥大学出版社,2023 年。平装书 30.00 美元;布书 99.00 美元;电子书 29.99 美元。帕迪斯-达巴希(Pardis Dabashi)的《失去情节》(Losing the Plot)一书从我们熟悉的领域开始:即使宣言宣称需要推陈出新,但实际上现有的现代主义写作在抛弃情节方面仍然存在矛盾。毕竟,有情节的叙事引人入胜是有道理的。它们提供了 "存在的承诺"(8),使 "占有欲极强的自由个人主义、异性婚姻以及进步的目的论历史观"(8)等美好事物变得可以想象。不过,达巴希很快就转向了风险更大、假设性更强的领域,开始论述认真对待不同作家(作为人类)和人物(令人惊讶的是,也是作为人类)的情感所带来的回报。失去情节》常常令人兴奋,从不枯燥乏味,它的最大价值或许在于让我们反思批评的意义,或者更具体地说,反思我们愿意在阅读中接受哪些证据。达巴希正确地提醒我们,必须在好莱坞电影崛起的背景下理解现代主义从现实主义情节中解脱出来的过程。对于达巴希来说,这意味着要理解现代主义作家个人所感受到的矛盾心理。当电影继承了现代主义小说放弃的情节,接管了 "资产阶级小说的文化、形式和心理工作"(8)时,被研究的作家--娜拉-拉尔森、朱娜-巴恩斯和威廉-福克纳--一定会怀着羡慕和沮丧的心情旁观。作者的意图,更不用说作者的感情,是一个出了名的棘手问题,我们中的大多数人在研究生阶段就学会了避免与它接触,就像美杜莎的头发一样,把眼睛专注地盯着文本。但是,《失去情节》一书却自由地进行假设(每章末尾都有反问句),探讨作者如何在观看电影或认同特定演员的过程中找到私人慰藉。这种推测有时会与历史证据相悖,比如福克纳,正如乔丹-布劳尔(Jordan Brower)最近指出的那样(《古典好莱坞,美国现代主义》,剑桥大学出版社,2024 年),福克纳对好莱坞电影业,尤其是米高梅制片厂怀恨在心。一个重要的假设是,一旦现代主义作家摆脱了丑恶的情绪,或者至少能够很好地控制这种情绪,坚持写作无情节的小说,他们这样做是以[第325页完]牺牲人物为代价的。根据这种说法,现代派小说犯下了令人震惊的虐待行为,因为那些在戏剧中寻求情节慰藉的作者拒绝为他们的人物提供同样的慰藉。例如,关于福克纳的第三章指出,《我弥留之际》中的现在时叙述表明,作者拒绝让他的人物 "在小说时间上获得牵引力"(165),"福克纳承认,在形式上偏离现实主义的前置时态涉及现代主义创作者对其人物的某种残忍"(164)。福克纳还说,"为了结果而争斗 "的 "受难人物 "是在与创作者作斗争,"不是与其他人物争斗,而是与他们自己的小说争斗,因为小说赋予了他们以苦难为定义的生活,也是与他们的作者争斗......"(26)。卢卡奇在现代主义中发现的精神病理学,以一种奇幻的、意想不到的方式回归,人物活灵活现,与作者分离。达巴希承认,把人物当作有意图、有感情的人来对待是犯了 "现实主义谬误"(25),但他还是找到了这样做的理由。认为演员可能与他们表演的剧本角色不一致并不奇怪。然而,下一步却令人好奇:本书从电影中人物的外在性残余中汲取灵感,从而倾向于而非远离文学中的现实谬误......《失去情节》借鉴了文学表述中现实谬误的错误性,因为这样做有助于我们认识到这些文学人物的欲望与他们所居住的小说在形式上有何不同,往往是截然不同的。(25)不过,一种与既定世界不匹配的委屈感是小说形式的一个决定性特征(注:同样是左黑格尔主义的卢卡奇),而...
{"title":"Losing the Plot: Film and Feeling in the Modern Novel by Pardis Dabashi (review)","authors":"Seo Hee Im","doi":"10.1353/sdn.2024.a935476","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2024.a935476","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;In lieu of&lt;/span&gt; an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:&lt;/span&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt; &lt;span&gt;Reviewed by:&lt;/span&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;!-- html_title --&gt; &lt;em&gt;Losing the Plot: Film and Feeling in the Modern Novel&lt;/em&gt; by Pardis Dabashi &lt;!-- /html_title --&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt; Seo Hee Im &lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt; DABASHI, PARDIS. &lt;em&gt;Losing the Plot: Film and Feeling in the Modern Novel&lt;/em&gt;. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2023. $30.00 paperback; $99.00 cloth; $29.99 e-book. &lt;p&gt;Pardis Dabashi's &lt;em&gt;Losing the Plot&lt;/em&gt; begins in familiar territory: even as manifestos declaimed the need to make it new, actually existing modernist writing remained conflicted about jettisoning plot. After all, plotted narratives were compelling for good reason. They provided \"existential promises\" (8) by making imaginable nice things like \"possessive liberal individualism, heterosexual marriage, and a progressive and teleological view of history\" (8). Quickly, though, Dabashi departs for riskier and more hypothetical terrains, into claims about the payoffs of taking seriously the feelings of various writers (as humans) and characters (also, surprisingly, as humans). Often exhilarating and never boring, &lt;em&gt;Losing the Plot&lt;/em&gt; is perhaps most valuable as an occasion to reflect on what it means to do criticism, or more specifically, which kinds of evidence we are willing to admit into a reading.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Dabashi rightly reminds us that modernist extrications from realist plot must be understood in the context of the rise of Hollywood cinema. For Dabashi, that means understanding the ambivalence that modernist writers would have felt personally. The writers examined—Nella Larsen, Djuna Barnes, and William Faulkner—must have looked on with envy and dismay as film, inheriting plots that modernist fiction abandoned, took over \"the cultural, formal, and psychic work of the bourgeois novel\" (8). Authorial intent, let alone authorial feeling, is a notoriously tricky thing, and most of us learn in graduate school to avoid contact with it, like Medusa's hair, by keeping our eyes studiously trained on the text. But &lt;em&gt;Losing the Plot&lt;/em&gt; engages freely in hypotheses (at the end of each chapter with rhetorical questions) about how authors must have found private comfort in watching films or in identifying with specific actors. Such speculations sometimes fly in the face of historical evidence, as in the case of Faulkner, who, as Jordan Brower has recently shown (&lt;em&gt;Classical Hollywood, American Modernism&lt;/em&gt;, Cambridge UP, 2024), nursed public grudges against the Hollywood film industry in general and MGM Studios in particular.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;A key hypothesis is that once modernist authors got over their ugly feelings, or at least managed them well enough to persist in writing plotless novels, they did so at &lt;strong&gt;[End Page 325]&lt;/strong&gt; the expense of their characters. According to this account, modernist novels perpetrate egregious acts of abuse, for the authors who sought the solaces of plot in theater","PeriodicalId":54138,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142189727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Contributors 贡献者
IF 0.2 2区 文学 N/A LITERATURE Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.1353/sdn.2024.a935498
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Contributors

Laura Schrock Crawford is Visiting Assistant Professor of English at Samford University. Prior to coming to Samford, she served as English Department Head and Humanities and Fine Arts Division Chair at Judson College until its closure in 2021. Crawford completed her PhD at the University of Mississippi in 2015, and her current research and teaching interests include studies in life stages, selfhood, and the Gothic novel.

Derek Ettensohn is Associate Professor of English and the Humanities at Sewanee: The University of the South. He works in the fields of global Anglophone literature and the health humanities. His research is interested in the representation of illness and the ethics of care in film and the contemporary Anglophone novel.

Mi Jeong Lee is an assistant professor in the Department of English Language and Literature at Seoul National University, in South Korea, where she teaches modern and contemporary British literature. Her current research focuses on spatiality, forms of the global, and narratives of large-scale catastrophe. Her work has appeared in Journal of Modern Literature, The Journal of English Language & Literature, and elsewhere.

Elly McCausland is Associate Professor of English Literature at Ghent University. She is the author of Malory's Magic Book: King Arthur and the Child, 1862–1980 (2019) and Risk in Children's Adventure Literature (2024). Her research interests include medievalism, ecocriticism, children's literature, ludonarratology, Victorian literature, and imperial romance. She is also an award-winning food writer.

Alejandra Ortega is Assistant Professor of English at the College of DuPage. A scholar of twentieth- and twenty-first-century literature, she has previously held a fellowship with the American Association of University Women. Her research interests include spatial theory, ecocriticism, postcolonial theory, gender, and narratology. Her work has been published in ISLE and Rhizomes, among other venues. She has also contributed a chapter to Michigan Salvage: The Fiction of Bonnie Jo Campbell (Michigan State UP, 2023).

Copyright © 2024 The Johns Hopkins University Press and the University of North Texas ...

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 作者劳拉-施罗克-克劳福德(Laura Schrock Crawford)是桑福德大学英语客座助理教授。在来到桑福德大学之前,她曾担任贾德森学院英语系主任和人文与艺术分部主席,直至该学院于 2021 年关闭。克劳福德于 2015 年在密西西比大学获得博士学位,她目前的研究和教学兴趣包括人生阶段、自我身份和哥特式小说研究。德里克-埃滕森(Derek Ettensohn)是南方大学西瓦尼分校英语和人文科学副教授。他从事全球英语文学和健康人文领域的研究。他的研究领域是电影和当代英语小说中对疾病和护理伦理的表现。Mi Jeong Lee 是韩国首尔国立大学英语语言文学系助理教授,教授现当代英国文学。她目前的研究重点是空间性、全球形式和大规模灾难叙事。她的作品发表在《现代文学杂志》、《英语语言与文学期刊》等刊物上。Elly McCausland 是根特大学英国文学副教授。她是《马洛里的魔法书》的作者:亚瑟王与儿童,1862-1980》(2019 年)和《儿童冒险文学中的风险》(2024 年)。她的研究兴趣包括中世纪主义、生态批评、儿童文学、鲁东叙事学、维多利亚文学和帝国浪漫主义。她还是一位屡获殊荣的美食作家。Alejandra Ortega 是杜帕奇学院英语系助理教授。她是二十世纪和二十一世纪文学学者,曾获得美国大学妇女协会奖学金。她的研究兴趣包括空间理论、生态批评、后殖民理论、性别和叙事学。她的作品曾发表在《ISLE》和《Rhizomes》等刊物上。她还为《密歇根打捞:邦妮-乔-坎贝尔的小说》(密歇根州立大学,2023 年)撰写了一章。版权所有 © 2024 约翰-霍普金斯大学出版社和北德克萨斯大学 ...
{"title":"Contributors","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/sdn.2024.a935498","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2024.a935498","url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\u0000<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Contributors <!-- /html_title --></li> </ul> <p>Laura Schrock Crawford is Visiting Assistant Professor of English at Samford University. Prior to coming to Samford, she served as English Department Head and Humanities and Fine Arts Division Chair at Judson College until its closure in 2021. Crawford completed her PhD at the University of Mississippi in 2015, and her current research and teaching interests include studies in life stages, selfhood, and the Gothic novel.</p> <p>Derek Ettensohn is Associate Professor of English and the Humanities at Sewanee: The University of the South. He works in the fields of global Anglophone literature and the health humanities. His research is interested in the representation of illness and the ethics of care in film and the contemporary Anglophone novel.</p> <p>Mi Jeong Lee is an assistant professor in the Department of English Language and Literature at Seoul National University, in South Korea, where she teaches modern and contemporary British literature. Her current research focuses on spatiality, forms of the global, and narratives of large-scale catastrophe. Her work has appeared in <em>Journal of Modern Literature, The Journal of English Language &amp; Literature</em>, and elsewhere.</p> <p>Elly McCausland is Associate Professor of English Literature at Ghent University. She is the author of <em>Malory's Magic Book: King Arthur and the Child, 1862–1980</em> (2019) and <em>Risk in Children's Adventure Literature</em> (2024). Her research interests include medievalism, ecocriticism, children's literature, ludonarratology, Victorian literature, and imperial romance. She is also an award-winning food writer.</p> <p>Alejandra Ortega is Assistant Professor of English at the College of DuPage. A scholar of twentieth- and twenty-first-century literature, she has previously held a fellowship with the American Association of University Women. Her research interests include spatial theory, ecocriticism, postcolonial theory, gender, and narratology. Her work has been published in <em>ISLE</em> and <em>Rhizomes</em>, among other venues. She has also contributed a chapter to <em>Michigan Salvage: The Fiction of Bonnie Jo Campbell</em> (Michigan State UP, 2023).</p> Copyright © 2024 The Johns Hopkins University Press and the University of North Texas ... </p>","PeriodicalId":54138,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142189730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What Proust Heard: Novels and the Ethnography of Talk by Michael Lucey (review) What Proust Heard:小说与谈话的民族志》,迈克尔-卢西著(评论)
IF 0.2 2区 文学 N/A LITERATURE Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.1353/sdn.2024.a935478
Maury Bruhn
<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span><p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>What Proust Heard: Novels and the Ethnography of Talk</em> by Michael Lucey <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Maury Bruhn </li> </ul> LUCEY, MICHAEL. <em>What Proust Heard: Novels and the Ethnography of Talk</em>. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2022. 346 pp. $35.00 paperback; $105.00 cloth; $34.99 e-book. <p>In 1979's <em>Shikasta</em>, Doris Lessing has a parenthetical aside about "Marcel Proust, sociologist and anthropologist," implying that from the perspective of the far-distant future when her novel takes place these will be the epithets chosen to describe Proust's work. Michael Lucey's <em>What Proust Heard: Novels and the Ethnography of Talk</em> suggests a similar reframing for the author of <em>In Search of Lost Time</em>. Against early critics like Jacques Rivière who proposed Proust as the psychological novelist par excellence, and against the received idea of Proust as champion of the solitary artist, the Proust that emerges in <em>What Proust Heard</em> is exquisitely attentive to talk: what is said, how it is said, and what that indicates about social structures. Lucey deftly weaves close readings from <em>In Search of Lost Time</em> with insights drawn from linguistic anthropologist Michael Silverstein and sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, among many others, to convincingly demonstrate that the linguistic anthropological and sociological aspects of Proust are essential to understanding his novel's structure. <strong>[End Page 329]</strong></p> <p><em>What Proust Heard</em> is divided into three chapters and three interludes (dedicated to Balzac and George Eliot, Virginia Woolf, and Nathalie Sarraute and Rachel Cusk). Lucey's first chapter, "Proust the Linguistic Anthropologist," outlines the "linguistic anthropological disposition of <em>Search</em>" (23), exploring Proust's descriptions of three levels of speech: general qualities such as accent and intonation; use of specific words; and the ways speech provides social scientific information for analysis. This chapter also introduces two of the central propositions running through <em>What Proust Heard</em>. The first is Lucey's insistence that, when we attend to the narrator's analysis of speech (how he enjoys the sound of Albertine and her friends talking, how he dislikes the talk of Mme. de Cambremer, how he highlights in both cases the conscious and unconscious class markers in their speech), we must also attend to the ways in which "the narrator's own language is part of the aesthetic and analytical arrangement of utterances that the novel offers for our consideration" (82). Lucey rightly maintains that the narrator is not a neutral observer and reporter, instead showing in his close readings how the narrator's own talk and reactions to the talk of others are also material offered by Proust for analysis. The second
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 What Proust Heard:小说和谈话的民族志》,作者:迈克尔-卢西(Michael Lucey)、莫里-布鲁恩(Maury Bruhn LUCEY, MICHAEL.What Proust Heard:Novels and the Ethnography of Talk.芝加哥和伦敦:芝加哥大学出版社,2022 年。346 pp.平装书 35.00 美元;布书 105.00 美元;电子书 34.99 美元。多丽丝-莱辛(Doris Lessing)在1979年出版的《希卡斯塔》(Shikasta)一书中有一段关于 "马塞尔-普鲁斯特,社会学家和人类学家 "的括号式旁白,暗示从遥远未来的视角来看,当她的小说发生时,这些都将成为描述普鲁斯特作品的称谓。迈克尔-卢西(Michael Lucey)的《普鲁斯特听到了什么》(What Proust Heard:小说与谈话民族学》为《寻找失去的时间》的作者提出了类似的重构建议。早期的评论家雅克-里维埃(Jacques Rivière)等人认为普鲁斯特是卓越的心理小说家,也有人认为普鲁斯特是孤独艺术家的拥护者,而《普鲁斯特听到了什么》一书中的普鲁斯特则对谈话给予了细致入微的关注:谈话的内容、方式以及谈话对社会结构的启示。卢西巧妙地将《寻找失去的时间》中的细读与语言人类学家迈克尔-西尔弗斯坦和社会学家皮埃尔-布尔迪厄等人的见解结合起来,令人信服地证明了普鲁斯特的语言人类学和社会学方面对于理解其小说结构至关重要。[普鲁斯特听见了什么》分为三章和三段插曲(献给巴尔扎克和乔治-艾略特、弗吉尼亚-伍尔夫以及娜塔莉-萨劳特和雷切尔-库斯克)。卢西的第一章 "语言人类学家普鲁斯特 "概述了"《搜索》的语言人类学倾向"(23),探讨了普鲁斯特对言语三个层面的描述:口音和语调等一般特质;特定词语的使用;以及言语提供社会科学信息以供分析的方式。本章还介绍了贯穿《普鲁斯特听见了什么》的两个核心命题。首先是卢西坚持认为,当我们关注叙述者对言语的分析时(他如何喜欢阿尔贝蒂娜和她的朋友们说话的声音,如何不喜欢德-康布雷默夫人的谈话,如何在这两种情况下强调他们言语中有意识和无意识的阶级标记),我们还必须关注 "叙述者自己的语言如何成为小说提供给我们思考的审美和分析语篇安排的一部分"(82)。卢西正确地认为,叙述者并不是一个中立的观察者和报道者,相反,他在细读中展示了叙述者自己的谈话和对他人谈话的反应也是普鲁斯特提供给我们分析的材料。第二个命题是,对言语的这些社会维度的关注如何使小说更大的结构特征显现出来。卢西分析了贵族夏吕斯与资产阶级凡尔杜林第一次聚餐时的社会动态,他指出 "在小说中,夏吕斯的身份是一系列跨越多年的此类聚餐中的一次......这涉及到几个相互竞争的广泛的社会项目。事实上,普鲁斯特的小说......最终想要揭示的似乎正是这些更为广泛的项目,以及它们与更大的社会进程之间的关系"(99)。对于不熟悉普鲁斯特小说整体的读者来说,《普鲁斯特听见了什么》有助于使其更大的结构成为焦点;而对于熟悉普鲁斯特小说的读者来说,《普鲁斯特听见了什么》则向我们展示了一种令人信服的可能性,即谈话不仅仅是小说中一个有趣的细节,而且是小说结构连贯性的关键之一。第二章"《寻找失去的时间》中的白痴言语(行为?卢西在引言中以查尔斯-斯旺和奥黛特之间的争吵为例,概述了这场争论的利害关系。斯旺试图让奥黛特表演演讲,发誓自己从未与其他女人在一起,但这一举动失败了。第二章继续论述卢西从这个例子中提出的论点,即在语言人类学对言语行为理论的批判中,以及在普鲁斯特的小说中,"某种通过重建来理解语言的计划......"。
{"title":"What Proust Heard: Novels and the Ethnography of Talk by Michael Lucey (review)","authors":"Maury Bruhn","doi":"10.1353/sdn.2024.a935478","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2024.a935478","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;In lieu of&lt;/span&gt; an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:&lt;/span&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt; &lt;span&gt;Reviewed by:&lt;/span&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;!-- html_title --&gt; &lt;em&gt;What Proust Heard: Novels and the Ethnography of Talk&lt;/em&gt; by Michael Lucey &lt;!-- /html_title --&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt; Maury Bruhn &lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt; LUCEY, MICHAEL. &lt;em&gt;What Proust Heard: Novels and the Ethnography of Talk&lt;/em&gt;. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2022. 346 pp. $35.00 paperback; $105.00 cloth; $34.99 e-book. &lt;p&gt;In 1979's &lt;em&gt;Shikasta&lt;/em&gt;, Doris Lessing has a parenthetical aside about \"Marcel Proust, sociologist and anthropologist,\" implying that from the perspective of the far-distant future when her novel takes place these will be the epithets chosen to describe Proust's work. Michael Lucey's &lt;em&gt;What Proust Heard: Novels and the Ethnography of Talk&lt;/em&gt; suggests a similar reframing for the author of &lt;em&gt;In Search of Lost Time&lt;/em&gt;. Against early critics like Jacques Rivière who proposed Proust as the psychological novelist par excellence, and against the received idea of Proust as champion of the solitary artist, the Proust that emerges in &lt;em&gt;What Proust Heard&lt;/em&gt; is exquisitely attentive to talk: what is said, how it is said, and what that indicates about social structures. Lucey deftly weaves close readings from &lt;em&gt;In Search of Lost Time&lt;/em&gt; with insights drawn from linguistic anthropologist Michael Silverstein and sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, among many others, to convincingly demonstrate that the linguistic anthropological and sociological aspects of Proust are essential to understanding his novel's structure. &lt;strong&gt;[End Page 329]&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;What Proust Heard&lt;/em&gt; is divided into three chapters and three interludes (dedicated to Balzac and George Eliot, Virginia Woolf, and Nathalie Sarraute and Rachel Cusk). Lucey's first chapter, \"Proust the Linguistic Anthropologist,\" outlines the \"linguistic anthropological disposition of &lt;em&gt;Search&lt;/em&gt;\" (23), exploring Proust's descriptions of three levels of speech: general qualities such as accent and intonation; use of specific words; and the ways speech provides social scientific information for analysis. This chapter also introduces two of the central propositions running through &lt;em&gt;What Proust Heard&lt;/em&gt;. The first is Lucey's insistence that, when we attend to the narrator's analysis of speech (how he enjoys the sound of Albertine and her friends talking, how he dislikes the talk of Mme. de Cambremer, how he highlights in both cases the conscious and unconscious class markers in their speech), we must also attend to the ways in which \"the narrator's own language is part of the aesthetic and analytical arrangement of utterances that the novel offers for our consideration\" (82). Lucey rightly maintains that the narrator is not a neutral observer and reporter, instead showing in his close readings how the narrator's own talk and reactions to the talk of others are also material offered by Proust for analysis. The second ","PeriodicalId":54138,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142189729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Swallowing the Whole: World, Planet, and Totality in the Planetary Fiction of H. G. Wells 吞噬整体:威尔斯行星小说中的世界、星球和整体
IF 0.2 2区 文学 N/A LITERATURE Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.1353/sdn.2024.a935471
Mi Jeong Lee

Abstract:

This essay examines the conflation between world and planet in H. G. Wells's turn-of-the-century science fiction. Writing when "world=planet" was not a given, Wells actively participated in the formation of the world-planet vocabulary across a range of genres and throughout the first half of the twentieth century. In particular, I look into the planetary experiments of his early fiction, where the materially limited planet continually thwarts the writer's attempts to equate that planet to the world he wished to develop as the ultimate political unit. Emerging through such attempts is a divergence between world and planet that enables us to think about the individual, the world, and the planet all on a commensurate scale, in a manner that is strikingly—and perhaps also troublingly—similar to what recent environmental discourse asks of us today.

摘要:这篇文章探讨了威尔斯(H. G. Wells)在世纪之交的科幻小说中将 "世界 "与 "星球 "混为一谈的问题。在 "世界=星球 "尚未成为定论的时代,威尔斯积极地参与了世界-星球词汇在20世纪上半叶各种体裁中的形成。在他的早期小说中,物质有限的星球不断阻挠作家将该星球等同于他希望发展为终极政治单位的世界的尝试。通过这种尝试,世界与星球之间出现了分歧,这使我们能够在一个相称的尺度上思考个人、世界和星球,其方式与当今环境论述对我们的要求惊人地相似,或许也令人不安。
{"title":"Swallowing the Whole: World, Planet, and Totality in the Planetary Fiction of H. G. Wells","authors":"Mi Jeong Lee","doi":"10.1353/sdn.2024.a935471","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2024.a935471","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>This essay examines the conflation between world and planet in H. G. Wells's turn-of-the-century science fiction. Writing when \"world=planet\" was not a given, Wells actively participated in the formation of the world-planet vocabulary across a range of genres and throughout the first half of the twentieth century. In particular, I look into the planetary experiments of his early fiction, where the materially limited planet continually thwarts the writer's attempts to equate that planet to the world he wished to develop as the ultimate political unit. Emerging through such attempts is a divergence between world and planet that enables us to think about the individual, the world, and the planet all on a commensurate scale, in a manner that is strikingly—and perhaps also troublingly—similar to what recent environmental discourse asks of us today.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":54138,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142189721","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
STUDIES IN THE NOVEL
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1