{"title":"对企业温室气体核算和报告的温室气体议定书方法与电子负债方法进行比较的评述","authors":"Janet Ranganathan","doi":"10.1080/17583004.2024.2397498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"E-liability is a GHG data management approach that has been proposed as an alternative to the GHG Protocol corporate standards, already widely adopted by businesses and voluntary and regulatory pro...","PeriodicalId":48941,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Management","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A commentary comparing the GHG Protocol and E-liability approaches to corporate GHG accounting and reporting\",\"authors\":\"Janet Ranganathan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17583004.2024.2397498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"E-liability is a GHG data management approach that has been proposed as an alternative to the GHG Protocol corporate standards, already widely adopted by businesses and voluntary and regulatory pro...\",\"PeriodicalId\":48941,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Carbon Management\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Carbon Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2024.2397498\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2024.2397498","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A commentary comparing the GHG Protocol and E-liability approaches to corporate GHG accounting and reporting
E-liability is a GHG data management approach that has been proposed as an alternative to the GHG Protocol corporate standards, already widely adopted by businesses and voluntary and regulatory pro...
期刊介绍：
Carbon Management is a scholarly peer-reviewed forum for insights from the diverse array of disciplines that enhance our understanding of carbon dioxide and other GHG interactions – from biology, ecology, chemistry and engineering to law, policy, economics and sociology.
The core aim of Carbon Management is it to examine the options and mechanisms for mitigating the causes and impacts of climate change, which includes mechanisms for reducing emissions and enhancing the removal of GHGs from the atmosphere, as well as metrics used to measure performance of options and mechanisms resulting from international treaties, domestic policies, local regulations, environmental markets, technologies, industrial efforts and consumer choices.
One key aim of the journal is to catalyse intellectual debate in an inclusive and scientific manner on the practical work of policy implementation related to the long-term effort of managing our global GHG emissions and impacts. Decisions made in the near future will have profound impacts on the global climate and biosphere. Carbon Management delivers research findings in an accessible format to inform decisions in the fields of research, education, management and environmental policy.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
