像骑士一样学习移动和规划:利用新颖的运动映射进行顺序决策

Carlos Alan Velazquez Vargas, Jordan A. Taylor
{"title":"像骑士一样学习移动和规划:利用新颖的运动映射进行顺序决策","authors":"Carlos Alan Velazquez Vargas, Jordan A. Taylor","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.29.610359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many skills that humans acquire throughout their lives, such as playing video games or sports, require substantial motor learning and multi-step planning. While both processes are typically studied separately, they are likely to interact during the acquisition of complex motor skills. In this work, we studied this interaction by assessing human performance in a sequential decision-making task that requires the learning of a non-trivial motor mapping. Participants were tasked to move a cursor from start to target locations in a grid world, using a standard keyboard. Notably, the specific keys were arbitrarily mapped to a movement rule resembling the Knight chess piece. In Experiment 1, we showed the learning of this mapping in the absence of planning, led to significant improvements in the task when presented with sequential decisions at a later stage. Computational modeling analysis revealed that such improvements resulted from an increased learning rate about the state transitions of the motor mapping, which also resulted in more flexible planning from trial to trial (less perseveration or habitual responses). In Experiment 2, we showed that incorporating mapping learning into the planning process, allows us to capture (1) differential task improvements for distinct planning horizons and (2) overall lower performance for longer horizons. Additionally, model analysis suggested that participants may limit their search to three steps ahead. We hypothesize that this limitation in planning horizon arises from capacity constraints in working memory, and may be the reason complex skills are often broken down into individual subroutines or components during learning.","PeriodicalId":501210,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Animal Behavior and Cognition","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning to Move and Plan like the Knight: Sequential Decision Making with a Novel Motor Mapping\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Alan Velazquez Vargas, Jordan A. Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.08.29.610359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many skills that humans acquire throughout their lives, such as playing video games or sports, require substantial motor learning and multi-step planning. While both processes are typically studied separately, they are likely to interact during the acquisition of complex motor skills. In this work, we studied this interaction by assessing human performance in a sequential decision-making task that requires the learning of a non-trivial motor mapping. Participants were tasked to move a cursor from start to target locations in a grid world, using a standard keyboard. Notably, the specific keys were arbitrarily mapped to a movement rule resembling the Knight chess piece. In Experiment 1, we showed the learning of this mapping in the absence of planning, led to significant improvements in the task when presented with sequential decisions at a later stage. Computational modeling analysis revealed that such improvements resulted from an increased learning rate about the state transitions of the motor mapping, which also resulted in more flexible planning from trial to trial (less perseveration or habitual responses). In Experiment 2, we showed that incorporating mapping learning into the planning process, allows us to capture (1) differential task improvements for distinct planning horizons and (2) overall lower performance for longer horizons. Additionally, model analysis suggested that participants may limit their search to three steps ahead. We hypothesize that this limitation in planning horizon arises from capacity constraints in working memory, and may be the reason complex skills are often broken down into individual subroutines or components during learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"bioRxiv - Animal Behavior and Cognition\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"bioRxiv - Animal Behavior and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.29.610359\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Animal Behavior and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.29.610359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类一生中掌握的许多技能,例如玩电子游戏或运动,都需要大量的运动学习和多步骤规划。虽然这两个过程通常是分开研究的,但在掌握复杂运动技能的过程中,它们很可能是相互作用的。在这项研究中,我们通过评估人类在一项需要学习非复杂运动映射的连续决策任务中的表现来研究这种相互作用。参与者的任务是使用标准键盘在网格世界中将光标从起始位置移动到目标位置。值得注意的是,特定的按键被任意映射到类似国际象棋马的运动规则上。在实验 1 中,我们发现,在没有计划的情况下学习这种映射规则,会在后期面临顺序决策时显著提高任务能力。计算建模分析表明,这种改进源于对运动映射状态转换的学习率的提高,这也导致了更灵活的试验到试验的计划(更少的锲而不舍或习惯性反应)。在实验 2 中,我们发现将映射学习纳入计划过程,可以捕捉到:(1)不同计划时间段的任务改进;(2)较长时间段的整体表现较差。此外,模型分析表明,参与者可能会将搜索范围限制在三步之内。我们推测,这种计划视野的限制来自于工作记忆的容量限制,这可能也是复杂技能在学习过程中经常被分解成单个子程序或组件的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Learning to Move and Plan like the Knight: Sequential Decision Making with a Novel Motor Mapping
Many skills that humans acquire throughout their lives, such as playing video games or sports, require substantial motor learning and multi-step planning. While both processes are typically studied separately, they are likely to interact during the acquisition of complex motor skills. In this work, we studied this interaction by assessing human performance in a sequential decision-making task that requires the learning of a non-trivial motor mapping. Participants were tasked to move a cursor from start to target locations in a grid world, using a standard keyboard. Notably, the specific keys were arbitrarily mapped to a movement rule resembling the Knight chess piece. In Experiment 1, we showed the learning of this mapping in the absence of planning, led to significant improvements in the task when presented with sequential decisions at a later stage. Computational modeling analysis revealed that such improvements resulted from an increased learning rate about the state transitions of the motor mapping, which also resulted in more flexible planning from trial to trial (less perseveration or habitual responses). In Experiment 2, we showed that incorporating mapping learning into the planning process, allows us to capture (1) differential task improvements for distinct planning horizons and (2) overall lower performance for longer horizons. Additionally, model analysis suggested that participants may limit their search to three steps ahead. We hypothesize that this limitation in planning horizon arises from capacity constraints in working memory, and may be the reason complex skills are often broken down into individual subroutines or components during learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emotional contexts influence vocal individuality in ungulates Athene cunicularia hypugaea wintering in a central California urban setting arrive later, leave earlier, prefer sheltered micro-habitat, tolerate rain, and contend with diverse predators Monkeys Predict US Elections Meat transfers follow social ties in the multi-level society of Guinea baboons but are not related to male reproductive success Jumping spiders are not fooled by the peripheral drift illusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1