{"title":"能效义务中的社会公平条款:法国项目的事后分析","authors":"Amélie Darmais , Matthieu Glachant , Victor Kahn","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We evaluate the distributional effects of the French energy efficiency obligations, focusing on a reform implemented from 2016 to 2018. This reform introduced two social equity measures: a sub-obligation requiring energy suppliers to achieve energy savings in residences occupied by fuel-poor households, and a bonus system granting additional certificates to suppliers supporting investments in such dwellings. Our analysis, based on aggregated data from 2019, reveals that the program initially succeeded in channeling financial benefits towards low-income households. However, the primary driver of this positive outcome – generous bonuses – went to pose a risk of reversing the intended effect. We provide a detailed explanation of this shift and offer policy recommendations for improving social equity provisions. Our findings indicate that there may be no discernible advantage in combining both measures to address social equity concerns, advocating instead for a program based solely on the sub-obligation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 114348"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social equity provisions in energy efficiency obligations: An ex-post analysis of the French program\",\"authors\":\"Amélie Darmais , Matthieu Glachant , Victor Kahn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We evaluate the distributional effects of the French energy efficiency obligations, focusing on a reform implemented from 2016 to 2018. This reform introduced two social equity measures: a sub-obligation requiring energy suppliers to achieve energy savings in residences occupied by fuel-poor households, and a bonus system granting additional certificates to suppliers supporting investments in such dwellings. Our analysis, based on aggregated data from 2019, reveals that the program initially succeeded in channeling financial benefits towards low-income households. However, the primary driver of this positive outcome – generous bonuses – went to pose a risk of reversing the intended effect. We provide a detailed explanation of this shift and offer policy recommendations for improving social equity provisions. Our findings indicate that there may be no discernible advantage in combining both measures to address social equity concerns, advocating instead for a program based solely on the sub-obligation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Policy\",\"volume\":\"195 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114348\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524003689\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524003689","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Social equity provisions in energy efficiency obligations: An ex-post analysis of the French program
We evaluate the distributional effects of the French energy efficiency obligations, focusing on a reform implemented from 2016 to 2018. This reform introduced two social equity measures: a sub-obligation requiring energy suppliers to achieve energy savings in residences occupied by fuel-poor households, and a bonus system granting additional certificates to suppliers supporting investments in such dwellings. Our analysis, based on aggregated data from 2019, reveals that the program initially succeeded in channeling financial benefits towards low-income households. However, the primary driver of this positive outcome – generous bonuses – went to pose a risk of reversing the intended effect. We provide a detailed explanation of this shift and offer policy recommendations for improving social equity provisions. Our findings indicate that there may be no discernible advantage in combining both measures to address social equity concerns, advocating instead for a program based solely on the sub-obligation.
期刊介绍:
Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques.
Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.