Laurie Showler MBChB , Adam M. Deane MBBS PhD , Edward Litton MBChB MSc , Melissa J. Ankravs BPharm MClinPharm , Bradley Wibrow MBBS MSc , Deborah Barge RN RM CCRN , Jeremy Goldin MBBS MM , Naomi Hammond RN MN PhD , Manoj K. Saxena MMBChir BSc , Paul J. Young MBChB PhD , Bala Venkatesh MBBS MD , Mark Finnis MBBS MBiostat , Yasmine Ali Abdelhamid MBBS PhD
{"title":"关于澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护病房住院病人夜间清醒时间和肠道药物助眠的多中心点流行率研究","authors":"Laurie Showler MBChB , Adam M. Deane MBBS PhD , Edward Litton MBChB MSc , Melissa J. Ankravs BPharm MClinPharm , Bradley Wibrow MBBS MSc , Deborah Barge RN RM CCRN , Jeremy Goldin MBBS MM , Naomi Hammond RN MN PhD , Manoj K. Saxena MMBChir BSc , Paul J. Young MBChB PhD , Bala Venkatesh MBBS MD , Mark Finnis MBBS MBiostat , Yasmine Ali Abdelhamid MBBS PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ccrj.2024.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Critically ill patients suffer disrupted sleep. Hypnotic medications may improve sleep; however, local epidemiological data regarding the amount of nocturnal time awake and the use of such medications is needed.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Point prevalence study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Adult ICUs in Australia and New Zealand.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>All adult patients admitted to participating Intensive Care Units (ICUs) on the study day.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>Time awake overnight (22:00–06:00) was determined by structured nurse observation. The use of enterally administered sedative-hypnotic drugs prior to and during ICU admission was recorded, as was the use of a unit policy and non-pharmacological sleep promotion strategies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Data were available for 532 patients admitted to 40 ICUs (median age 60 years, 336 (63.2%) male, and 222 (41.7%) invasively ventilated). Forty-eight patients (9.0%) received an enteral pharmacological sleep aid, of which melatonin (28, 5.2%) was most frequently used. Patients not invasively ventilated were observed to be awake overnight for a median of 4.0 h (interquartile range (IQR): 2.5, 5.5), with no difference in those receiving an enteral hypnotic (p = 0.9). Non-pharmacological sleep aids were reportedly not offered or available for 52% (earplugs) and 63% of patients (eye masks). Only 7 (17.5%) participating ICUs had a policy informing sleep-optimising interventions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients not receiving invasive ventilation appeared to spend many nocturnal hours awake. Pharmacological sleep aid administration was not associated with a greater observed time asleep. Most patients did not receive any non-pharmacological aid, and most ICUs did not have a local guideline or unit policy on sleep promotion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49215,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","volume":"26 3","pages":"Pages 192-197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277224000255/pdfft?md5=57ab8f01891fcbe0c84f074506be7286&pid=1-s2.0-S1441277224000255-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multicentre point prevalence study of nocturnal hours awake and enteral pharmacological sleep aids in patients admitted to Australian and New Zealand intensive care units\",\"authors\":\"Laurie Showler MBChB , Adam M. Deane MBBS PhD , Edward Litton MBChB MSc , Melissa J. Ankravs BPharm MClinPharm , Bradley Wibrow MBBS MSc , Deborah Barge RN RM CCRN , Jeremy Goldin MBBS MM , Naomi Hammond RN MN PhD , Manoj K. Saxena MMBChir BSc , Paul J. Young MBChB PhD , Bala Venkatesh MBBS MD , Mark Finnis MBBS MBiostat , Yasmine Ali Abdelhamid MBBS PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ccrj.2024.06.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Critically ill patients suffer disrupted sleep. Hypnotic medications may improve sleep; however, local epidemiological data regarding the amount of nocturnal time awake and the use of such medications is needed.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Point prevalence study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Adult ICUs in Australia and New Zealand.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>All adult patients admitted to participating Intensive Care Units (ICUs) on the study day.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>Time awake overnight (22:00–06:00) was determined by structured nurse observation. The use of enterally administered sedative-hypnotic drugs prior to and during ICU admission was recorded, as was the use of a unit policy and non-pharmacological sleep promotion strategies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Data were available for 532 patients admitted to 40 ICUs (median age 60 years, 336 (63.2%) male, and 222 (41.7%) invasively ventilated). Forty-eight patients (9.0%) received an enteral pharmacological sleep aid, of which melatonin (28, 5.2%) was most frequently used. Patients not invasively ventilated were observed to be awake overnight for a median of 4.0 h (interquartile range (IQR): 2.5, 5.5), with no difference in those receiving an enteral hypnotic (p = 0.9). Non-pharmacological sleep aids were reportedly not offered or available for 52% (earplugs) and 63% of patients (eye masks). Only 7 (17.5%) participating ICUs had a policy informing sleep-optimising interventions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients not receiving invasive ventilation appeared to spend many nocturnal hours awake. Pharmacological sleep aid administration was not associated with a greater observed time asleep. Most patients did not receive any non-pharmacological aid, and most ICUs did not have a local guideline or unit policy on sleep promotion.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care and Resuscitation\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 192-197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277224000255/pdfft?md5=57ab8f01891fcbe0c84f074506be7286&pid=1-s2.0-S1441277224000255-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care and Resuscitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277224000255\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277224000255","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
A multicentre point prevalence study of nocturnal hours awake and enteral pharmacological sleep aids in patients admitted to Australian and New Zealand intensive care units
Objective
Critically ill patients suffer disrupted sleep. Hypnotic medications may improve sleep; however, local epidemiological data regarding the amount of nocturnal time awake and the use of such medications is needed.
Design
Point prevalence study.
Setting
Adult ICUs in Australia and New Zealand.
Participants
All adult patients admitted to participating Intensive Care Units (ICUs) on the study day.
Main outcome measures
Time awake overnight (22:00–06:00) was determined by structured nurse observation. The use of enterally administered sedative-hypnotic drugs prior to and during ICU admission was recorded, as was the use of a unit policy and non-pharmacological sleep promotion strategies.
Results
Data were available for 532 patients admitted to 40 ICUs (median age 60 years, 336 (63.2%) male, and 222 (41.7%) invasively ventilated). Forty-eight patients (9.0%) received an enteral pharmacological sleep aid, of which melatonin (28, 5.2%) was most frequently used. Patients not invasively ventilated were observed to be awake overnight for a median of 4.0 h (interquartile range (IQR): 2.5, 5.5), with no difference in those receiving an enteral hypnotic (p = 0.9). Non-pharmacological sleep aids were reportedly not offered or available for 52% (earplugs) and 63% of patients (eye masks). Only 7 (17.5%) participating ICUs had a policy informing sleep-optimising interventions.
Conclusions
Patients not receiving invasive ventilation appeared to spend many nocturnal hours awake. Pharmacological sleep aid administration was not associated with a greater observed time asleep. Most patients did not receive any non-pharmacological aid, and most ICUs did not have a local guideline or unit policy on sleep promotion.
期刊介绍:
ritical Care and Resuscitation (CC&R) is the official scientific journal of the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM). The Journal is a quarterly publication (ISSN 1441-2772) with original articles of scientific and clinical interest in the specialities of Critical Care, Intensive Care, Anaesthesia, Emergency Medicine and related disciplines.
The Journal is received by all Fellows and trainees, along with an increasing number of subscribers from around the world.
The CC&R Journal currently has an impact factor of 3.3, placing it in 8th position in world critical care journals and in first position in the world outside the USA and Europe.