马来西亚光伏系统的报废:采用生命周期方法评估管理战略

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Sustainable Production and Consumption Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1016/j.spc.2024.08.008
Atiqah Hamizah Mohd Nordin , Shahril Irwan Sulaiman , Sulaiman Shaari , Rijalul Fahmi Mustapa
{"title":"马来西亚光伏系统的报废:采用生命周期方法评估管理战略","authors":"Atiqah Hamizah Mohd Nordin ,&nbsp;Shahril Irwan Sulaiman ,&nbsp;Sulaiman Shaari ,&nbsp;Rijalul Fahmi Mustapa","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents the development of photovoltaic (PV) end-of-life (EoL) policy options in Malaysia with consideration of the respective environmental impacts and economic implication. Five policy options were initially formulated based on different combinations of voluntary and regulatory approaches, PV module EoL pathways, i.e. recycling, landfill and incineration, and types of EoL PV modules. Then, the environmental impacts of each option were evaluated using life cycle assessment based on seven relevant impact categories. Later, the economic implication of each policy option was determined based on revenue gained from recovered materials and cost of recycling. Results showed that recycling yields net environmental benefits in all impact categories for crystalline silicon (c-Si) modules and almost all impact categories for cadmium telluride (CdTe) modules. While both regulatory and voluntary approaches offer reduced environmental impacts, the former is more beneficial than the latter as it provides higher quantity of recycled EoL PV modules, net environmental benefit, net primary energy avoidance and net economic benefit. Also, the inclusion of both c-Si and CdTe in recycling is preferred as it yields higher quantity of recycled PV modules as well as higher net environmental benefit and net primary energy avoidance gained in most impact categories. However, the net economic benefit is lower than recycling c-Si alone because the cost of recycling CdTe modules is higher than the revenue gained from recovered materials. These findings seek to assist in establishing sustainable EoL PV management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"50 ","pages":"Pages 587-609"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards end-of-life of photovoltaic systems in Malaysia: An assessment of management strategies using a life cycle approach\",\"authors\":\"Atiqah Hamizah Mohd Nordin ,&nbsp;Shahril Irwan Sulaiman ,&nbsp;Sulaiman Shaari ,&nbsp;Rijalul Fahmi Mustapa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spc.2024.08.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper presents the development of photovoltaic (PV) end-of-life (EoL) policy options in Malaysia with consideration of the respective environmental impacts and economic implication. Five policy options were initially formulated based on different combinations of voluntary and regulatory approaches, PV module EoL pathways, i.e. recycling, landfill and incineration, and types of EoL PV modules. Then, the environmental impacts of each option were evaluated using life cycle assessment based on seven relevant impact categories. Later, the economic implication of each policy option was determined based on revenue gained from recovered materials and cost of recycling. Results showed that recycling yields net environmental benefits in all impact categories for crystalline silicon (c-Si) modules and almost all impact categories for cadmium telluride (CdTe) modules. While both regulatory and voluntary approaches offer reduced environmental impacts, the former is more beneficial than the latter as it provides higher quantity of recycled EoL PV modules, net environmental benefit, net primary energy avoidance and net economic benefit. Also, the inclusion of both c-Si and CdTe in recycling is preferred as it yields higher quantity of recycled PV modules as well as higher net environmental benefit and net primary energy avoidance gained in most impact categories. However, the net economic benefit is lower than recycling c-Si alone because the cost of recycling CdTe modules is higher than the revenue gained from recovered materials. These findings seek to assist in establishing sustainable EoL PV management.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Production and Consumption\",\"volume\":\"50 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 587-609\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Production and Consumption\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550924002343\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550924002343","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了马来西亚光伏(PV)报废(EoL)政策选择的发展情况,并考虑了各自对环境的影响和经济影响。根据自愿和监管方法的不同组合、光伏组件的 EoL 途径(即回收、填埋和焚烧)以及 EoL 光伏组件的类型,初步制定了五个政策选项。然后,利用基于七个相关影响类别的生命周期评估对每种方案的环境影响进行评估。随后,根据从回收材料中获得的收入和回收成本,确定了每种政策方案的经济影响。结果表明,对于晶体硅(c-Si)组件,回收利用在所有影响类别中都产生了净环境效益,而对于碲化镉(CdTe)组件,回收利用几乎在所有影响类别中都产生了净环境效益。虽然监管方法和自愿方法都能减少对环境的影响,但前者比后者更有利,因为它能提供更多的可回收 EoL 光伏组件、净环境效益、净一次能源避免量和净经济效益。此外,将晶体硅和碲化镉同时纳入回收范围更可取,因为这样可获得更高的回收光伏组件数量,以及在大多数影响类别中获得更高的净环境效益和净初级能源避免量。不过,净经济效益低于单独回收晶体硅,因为碲化镉模块的回收成本高于从回收材料中获得的收益。这些发现有助于建立可持续的 EoL 光伏管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards end-of-life of photovoltaic systems in Malaysia: An assessment of management strategies using a life cycle approach

This paper presents the development of photovoltaic (PV) end-of-life (EoL) policy options in Malaysia with consideration of the respective environmental impacts and economic implication. Five policy options were initially formulated based on different combinations of voluntary and regulatory approaches, PV module EoL pathways, i.e. recycling, landfill and incineration, and types of EoL PV modules. Then, the environmental impacts of each option were evaluated using life cycle assessment based on seven relevant impact categories. Later, the economic implication of each policy option was determined based on revenue gained from recovered materials and cost of recycling. Results showed that recycling yields net environmental benefits in all impact categories for crystalline silicon (c-Si) modules and almost all impact categories for cadmium telluride (CdTe) modules. While both regulatory and voluntary approaches offer reduced environmental impacts, the former is more beneficial than the latter as it provides higher quantity of recycled EoL PV modules, net environmental benefit, net primary energy avoidance and net economic benefit. Also, the inclusion of both c-Si and CdTe in recycling is preferred as it yields higher quantity of recycled PV modules as well as higher net environmental benefit and net primary energy avoidance gained in most impact categories. However, the net economic benefit is lower than recycling c-Si alone because the cost of recycling CdTe modules is higher than the revenue gained from recovered materials. These findings seek to assist in establishing sustainable EoL PV management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
期刊最新文献
A value-sensitive approach for integrated seawater desalination and brine treatment Conceptualizing circular economy policy instruments: The case of recycled content standards A review of life cycle impacts and costs of precision agriculture for cultivation of field crops An interlinked dynamic model of timber and carbon stocks in Japan's wooden houses and plantation forests Lithium from clay: Assessing the environmental impacts of extraction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1