生物制剂对哮喘疗效的时间变化:患者特征变化对疗效的影响

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Respiratory medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107802
{"title":"生物制剂对哮喘疗效的时间变化:患者特征变化对疗效的影响","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The underlying population of patients selected for each respiratory monoclonal antibody might change as other biologics are approved.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate effect modification by calendar time of the effectiveness of each respiratory biologics in asthma.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Effectiveness of Respiratory biologics in Asthma (ERA) is a retrospective cohort of severe asthma patients from the Mass General Brigham clinics between January 2013 and September 2023. Periods were pre-specified as the anti-IgE (2013–2015), anti-IL5 (2016–2018), anti-IL4/13 (2019–2021) or anti-alarmin (2022–2023) era. We evaluated each biologic's effect on asthma-related exacerbations comparing the one-year period before and after therapy initiation using Poisson regression and Cox regression for time-to-first exacerbation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 647 biologic-naïve patients, 165 initiated omalizumab, 235 anti-IL5, 227 dupilumab, and 20 tezepelumab. Omalizumab's effectiveness improved as more biologics were approved: incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.16 [0.94–1.43] anti-IgE era vs. 0.54 [0.37–0.80] anti-IL4/13-alarmin era. Omalizumab patients in the anti-IL4/13-alarmin era had lower blood eosinophil counts and less chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). For anti-IL5s, effectiveness peaked in the anti-IL4/13 era (IRR 0.52 [0.42–0.64]) when patients had higher BMI and less concomitant CRSwNP. Dupilumab was most effective in the anti-IL4/13 era (IRR 0.60 [0.50–0.72]). There were fewer current smokers in dupilumab patients in the anti-IL4/13 era. Results were similar in time-to-event analyses and in sensitivity analyses accounting for the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There are temporal variations in the effectiveness of biologics partly explained by the shift in the underlying population, particularly for omalizumab. Though having more choices was associated with better patient selection for omalizumab, this was inconsistent for other biologics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21057,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611124002774/pdfft?md5=8857e65b3c3824bea2a0983a72f60893&pid=1-s2.0-S0954611124002774-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal variation in the effectiveness of biologics in asthma: Effect modification by changing patient characteristics\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The underlying population of patients selected for each respiratory monoclonal antibody might change as other biologics are approved.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate effect modification by calendar time of the effectiveness of each respiratory biologics in asthma.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Effectiveness of Respiratory biologics in Asthma (ERA) is a retrospective cohort of severe asthma patients from the Mass General Brigham clinics between January 2013 and September 2023. Periods were pre-specified as the anti-IgE (2013–2015), anti-IL5 (2016–2018), anti-IL4/13 (2019–2021) or anti-alarmin (2022–2023) era. We evaluated each biologic's effect on asthma-related exacerbations comparing the one-year period before and after therapy initiation using Poisson regression and Cox regression for time-to-first exacerbation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 647 biologic-naïve patients, 165 initiated omalizumab, 235 anti-IL5, 227 dupilumab, and 20 tezepelumab. Omalizumab's effectiveness improved as more biologics were approved: incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.16 [0.94–1.43] anti-IgE era vs. 0.54 [0.37–0.80] anti-IL4/13-alarmin era. Omalizumab patients in the anti-IL4/13-alarmin era had lower blood eosinophil counts and less chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). For anti-IL5s, effectiveness peaked in the anti-IL4/13 era (IRR 0.52 [0.42–0.64]) when patients had higher BMI and less concomitant CRSwNP. Dupilumab was most effective in the anti-IL4/13 era (IRR 0.60 [0.50–0.72]). There were fewer current smokers in dupilumab patients in the anti-IL4/13 era. Results were similar in time-to-event analyses and in sensitivity analyses accounting for the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There are temporal variations in the effectiveness of biologics partly explained by the shift in the underlying population, particularly for omalizumab. Though having more choices was associated with better patient selection for omalizumab, this was inconsistent for other biologics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611124002774/pdfft?md5=8857e65b3c3824bea2a0983a72f60893&pid=1-s2.0-S0954611124002774-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611124002774\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611124002774","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景随着其他生物制剂的批准,每种呼吸系统单克隆抗体所选患者的基本人群可能会发生变化。目的评估每种呼吸系统生物制剂在哮喘中的疗效随日历时间变化的影响。方法哮喘中呼吸系统生物制剂的疗效(ERA)是对2013年1月至2023年9月期间布里格姆综合医院门诊重症哮喘患者的回顾性队列研究。我们预先设定了抗IgE(2013-2015年)、抗IL5(2016-2018年)、抗IL4/13(2019-2021年)或抗armin(2022-2023年)时代。我们使用泊松回归和首次加重时间的 Cox 回归评估了每种生物制剂在开始治疗前后一年内对哮喘相关加重的影响。结果 在 647 例未使用过生物制剂的患者中,165 例开始使用奥马珠单抗,235 例开始使用抗 IL5,227 例开始使用杜匹单抗,20 例开始使用替塞单抗。随着越来越多的生物制剂获得批准,奥马珠单抗的疗效也得到了改善:抗IgE时代的发病率比(IRR)为1.16 [0.94-1.43] ,而抗IL4/13-armin时代的发病率比(IRR)为0.54 [0.37-0.80] 。抗IL4/13-armin时代的奥马珠单抗患者血液中嗜酸性粒细胞计数较低,慢性鼻炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)较少。就抗IL5s而言,抗IL4/13时代的疗效达到顶峰(IRR为0.52 [0.42-0.64]),此时患者的体重指数(BMI)较高,并发CRSwNP较少。在抗IL4/13时代,杜比鲁单抗的疗效最好(IRR为0.60 [0.50-0.72])。抗IL4/13时代的杜匹鲁单抗患者中吸烟者较少。结论生物制剂的疗效存在时间差异,部分原因是基础人群发生了变化,尤其是奥马珠单抗。虽然有更多的选择与更好地选择奥马珠单抗的患者有关,但其他生物制剂的情况却不尽相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Temporal variation in the effectiveness of biologics in asthma: Effect modification by changing patient characteristics

Background

The underlying population of patients selected for each respiratory monoclonal antibody might change as other biologics are approved.

Objective

To evaluate effect modification by calendar time of the effectiveness of each respiratory biologics in asthma.

Methods

The Effectiveness of Respiratory biologics in Asthma (ERA) is a retrospective cohort of severe asthma patients from the Mass General Brigham clinics between January 2013 and September 2023. Periods were pre-specified as the anti-IgE (2013–2015), anti-IL5 (2016–2018), anti-IL4/13 (2019–2021) or anti-alarmin (2022–2023) era. We evaluated each biologic's effect on asthma-related exacerbations comparing the one-year period before and after therapy initiation using Poisson regression and Cox regression for time-to-first exacerbation.

Results

Of 647 biologic-naïve patients, 165 initiated omalizumab, 235 anti-IL5, 227 dupilumab, and 20 tezepelumab. Omalizumab's effectiveness improved as more biologics were approved: incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.16 [0.94–1.43] anti-IgE era vs. 0.54 [0.37–0.80] anti-IL4/13-alarmin era. Omalizumab patients in the anti-IL4/13-alarmin era had lower blood eosinophil counts and less chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). For anti-IL5s, effectiveness peaked in the anti-IL4/13 era (IRR 0.52 [0.42–0.64]) when patients had higher BMI and less concomitant CRSwNP. Dupilumab was most effective in the anti-IL4/13 era (IRR 0.60 [0.50–0.72]). There were fewer current smokers in dupilumab patients in the anti-IL4/13 era. Results were similar in time-to-event analyses and in sensitivity analyses accounting for the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusion

There are temporal variations in the effectiveness of biologics partly explained by the shift in the underlying population, particularly for omalizumab. Though having more choices was associated with better patient selection for omalizumab, this was inconsistent for other biologics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory medicine
Respiratory medicine 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Respiratory Medicine is an internationally-renowned journal devoted to the rapid publication of clinically-relevant respiratory medicine research. It combines cutting-edge original research with state-of-the-art reviews dealing with all aspects of respiratory diseases and therapeutic interventions. Topics include adult and paediatric medicine, epidemiology, immunology and cell biology, physiology, occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants. Respiratory Medicine is increasingly the journal of choice for publication of phased trial work, commenting on effectiveness, dosage and methods of action.
期刊最新文献
Real-world phenotyping and risk assessment of childhood asthma burden using national registries Predictive factors for tuberculous peripheral pulmonary lesions during radial endobronchial ultrasound Preserved ratio impaired spirometry and severity of obstructive sleep apnea: An observational cross-sectional study Is it worth screening quarry workers for TB infection in high-incidence areas? A cost-benefit analysis Temporal variation in the effectiveness of biologics in asthma: Effect modification by changing patient characteristics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1