新生儿重症监护室中开放式和封闭式抽吸系统对新生儿疼痛和生命体征的影响

Aslı Alaca MSc , Hatice Yildirim Sari , Hanife Karaöz , Hatice Akın Bostan , Defne Engür
{"title":"新生儿重症监护室中开放式和封闭式抽吸系统对新生儿疼痛和生命体征的影响","authors":"Aslı Alaca MSc ,&nbsp;Hatice Yildirim Sari ,&nbsp;Hanife Karaöz ,&nbsp;Hatice Akın Bostan ,&nbsp;Defne Engür","doi":"10.1016/j.pedn.2024.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Endotracheal suctioning is a procedure used by neonatal intensive care unit nurses to maximize oxygenation and clear airways of secretions, and is one of the most common painful procedures causing stress in intubated newborns.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This aim of this study is to compare the effects of open and closed endotracheal suctioning on pain, peak heart rate and oxygen saturation in neonates on mechanicalventilation.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This experimental-design study was conducted on 30 newborns who were mechanically ventilated in the tertiary neonatal intensive care unit of a public hospital. First, closed suctioning and then open suctioning was performed on patients during the day. Pain, peak heart rate and oxygen saturation levels were evaluated before, during and 30 min after each suctioning procedure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the newborns included in the study, 53.3 % were male and 36.6 % were admitted to intensive care unit due to a heart defect. No statistically significant differences were found in pain, peak heart rate, or oxygen saturation between the open and closed suctioning methods. However, oxygen saturation levels during suctioning were lower compared to levels before and 30 min after the procedure. Additionally, peak heart rate was lower during suctioning compared to 30 min afterward.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study concludes that there is no significant difference between open and closed suctioning techniques concerning pain, peak heart rate, and oxygen saturation.</p></div><div><h3>Implications to practice</h3><p>Given its sterility and ease of use, the closed suction method may be preferable in clinical settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Nursing-Nursing Care of Children & Families","volume":"79 ","pages":"Pages 181-185"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of open and closed suctioning systems on neonatal pain and vital signs in neonatal intensive care units\",\"authors\":\"Aslı Alaca MSc ,&nbsp;Hatice Yildirim Sari ,&nbsp;Hanife Karaöz ,&nbsp;Hatice Akın Bostan ,&nbsp;Defne Engür\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pedn.2024.09.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Endotracheal suctioning is a procedure used by neonatal intensive care unit nurses to maximize oxygenation and clear airways of secretions, and is one of the most common painful procedures causing stress in intubated newborns.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This aim of this study is to compare the effects of open and closed endotracheal suctioning on pain, peak heart rate and oxygen saturation in neonates on mechanicalventilation.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This experimental-design study was conducted on 30 newborns who were mechanically ventilated in the tertiary neonatal intensive care unit of a public hospital. First, closed suctioning and then open suctioning was performed on patients during the day. Pain, peak heart rate and oxygen saturation levels were evaluated before, during and 30 min after each suctioning procedure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the newborns included in the study, 53.3 % were male and 36.6 % were admitted to intensive care unit due to a heart defect. No statistically significant differences were found in pain, peak heart rate, or oxygen saturation between the open and closed suctioning methods. However, oxygen saturation levels during suctioning were lower compared to levels before and 30 min after the procedure. Additionally, peak heart rate was lower during suctioning compared to 30 min afterward.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study concludes that there is no significant difference between open and closed suctioning techniques concerning pain, peak heart rate, and oxygen saturation.</p></div><div><h3>Implications to practice</h3><p>Given its sterility and ease of use, the closed suction method may be preferable in clinical settings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Nursing-Nursing Care of Children & Families\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 181-185\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Nursing-Nursing Care of Children & Families\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0882596324003488\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Nursing-Nursing Care of Children & Families","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0882596324003488","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景气管内吸引是新生儿重症监护室护士用来最大限度地增加氧合和清除气道分泌物的一种程序,也是导致插管新生儿紧张的最常见的疼痛程序之一。本研究旨在比较开放式和封闭式气管内吸痰对接受机械通气的新生儿的疼痛、峰值心率和血氧饱和度的影响。首先在白天对患者进行封闭式抽吸,然后进行开放式抽吸。在每次抽吸前、抽吸过程中和抽吸后 30 分钟,对疼痛、心率峰值和血氧饱和度进行了评估。在疼痛、峰值心率或氧饱和度方面,开放式和封闭式抽吸法没有发现明显的统计学差异。不过,抽吸过程中的血氧饱和度低于手术前和手术后 30 分钟的水平。该研究得出结论,开放式和封闭式抽吸技术在疼痛、心率峰值和血氧饱和度方面没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effects of open and closed suctioning systems on neonatal pain and vital signs in neonatal intensive care units

Background

Endotracheal suctioning is a procedure used by neonatal intensive care unit nurses to maximize oxygenation and clear airways of secretions, and is one of the most common painful procedures causing stress in intubated newborns.

Aim

This aim of this study is to compare the effects of open and closed endotracheal suctioning on pain, peak heart rate and oxygen saturation in neonates on mechanicalventilation.

Materials and methods

This experimental-design study was conducted on 30 newborns who were mechanically ventilated in the tertiary neonatal intensive care unit of a public hospital. First, closed suctioning and then open suctioning was performed on patients during the day. Pain, peak heart rate and oxygen saturation levels were evaluated before, during and 30 min after each suctioning procedure.

Results

Of the newborns included in the study, 53.3 % were male and 36.6 % were admitted to intensive care unit due to a heart defect. No statistically significant differences were found in pain, peak heart rate, or oxygen saturation between the open and closed suctioning methods. However, oxygen saturation levels during suctioning were lower compared to levels before and 30 min after the procedure. Additionally, peak heart rate was lower during suctioning compared to 30 min afterward.

Conclusions

The study concludes that there is no significant difference between open and closed suctioning techniques concerning pain, peak heart rate, and oxygen saturation.

Implications to practice

Given its sterility and ease of use, the closed suction method may be preferable in clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
291
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the Society of Pediatric Nurses and the Pediatric Endocrinology Nursing Society (PENS) The Journal of Pediatric Nursing: Nursing Care of Children and Families (JPN) is interested in publishing evidence-based practice, quality improvement, theory, and research papers on a variety of topics from US and international authors. JPN is the official journal of the Society of Pediatric Nurses and the Pediatric Endocrinology Nursing Society. Cecily L. Betz, PhD, RN, FAAN is the Founder and Editor in Chief. Journal content covers the life span from birth to adolescence. Submissions should be pertinent to the nursing care needs of healthy and ill infants, children, and adolescents, addressing their biopsychosocial needs. JPN also features the following regular columns for which authors may submit brief papers: Hot Topics and Technology.
期刊最新文献
Identifying missed care in pediatric nursing: A scoping review The development of sudden infant death syndrome awareness scale-mother form and examination of its psychometric properties Effects of hospital treatment for congenital heart defects on mother-infant bonding, maternal stress, and parenting Psychosocial factors correlating self-care management among Jordanian adolescents with type 1 diabetes The social inclusion of care leavers during their transitioning to independent life from aftercare services – A mixed method, retrospective document analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1