基于紫杉醇或 S-1 方案的同期化放疗治疗老年食管鳞状细胞癌的疗效和安全性: 一项多中心倾向分数匹配研究

IF 5 2区 医学 Q2 Medicine Translational Oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102123
Yiyu Guo , Tian Wang , Hui Li , Xuefeng Zhou , Haifeng Shi , Daguang Wu , Huiguo Shan , Guoren Zhou , Zhi Zhang , Jinjun Ye
{"title":"基于紫杉醇或 S-1 方案的同期化放疗治疗老年食管鳞状细胞癌的疗效和安全性: 一项多中心倾向分数匹配研究","authors":"Yiyu Guo ,&nbsp;Tian Wang ,&nbsp;Hui Li ,&nbsp;Xuefeng Zhou ,&nbsp;Haifeng Shi ,&nbsp;Daguang Wu ,&nbsp;Huiguo Shan ,&nbsp;Guoren Zhou ,&nbsp;Zhi Zhang ,&nbsp;Jinjun Ye","doi":"10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Elderly patients with esophageal cancer can benefit from concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). However, the optimal concurrent chemotherapy regimen remains undetermined. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of CCRT with paclitaxel-based or S-1 regimens in treating elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>From January 2016 to November 2022, a total of 349 patients aged 70 and above with ESCC were included. The patient population was divided into two treatment groups: patients receiving paclitaxel-based CCRT were allocated to the TP group, and those receiving S-1 regimen CCRT were allocated to the S-1 group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance potential biases. Survival outcomes, overall response rate, and treatment-related toxicities were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After PSM, there were 82 patients in each group. The median follow up of the surviving patients was 42.6 months (IQR 28.0–58.8 months). The 2-year overall survival (OS) rate (71.4% vs 65.4%; log-rank <em>P</em> = 0.010) and progression-free survival (PFS) rate (64.4% vs 58.0%; log-rank <em>P</em> = 0.048) were significantly higher in the TP group. Compared with the S-1 group, the TP group experienced a higher rate of grade 3 and above hematologic toxicities, such as leukopenia (47.6% vs 15.9%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and neutropenia (35.4% vs 6.1%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). One patient in the TP group and two patients in the S-1 group had grade 5 toxic effects.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings suggest that paclitaxel-based CCRT was well tolerated in elderly patients with ESCC and provided significant survival benefits over S-1 regimen.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48975,"journal":{"name":"Translational Oncology","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 102123"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193652332400250X/pdfft?md5=4201e3c09f1e50c74b2414b9c43fffc3&pid=1-s2.0-S193652332400250X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel-based or S-1 regimens in treating elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A multi-center propensity-score matched study\",\"authors\":\"Yiyu Guo ,&nbsp;Tian Wang ,&nbsp;Hui Li ,&nbsp;Xuefeng Zhou ,&nbsp;Haifeng Shi ,&nbsp;Daguang Wu ,&nbsp;Huiguo Shan ,&nbsp;Guoren Zhou ,&nbsp;Zhi Zhang ,&nbsp;Jinjun Ye\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Elderly patients with esophageal cancer can benefit from concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). However, the optimal concurrent chemotherapy regimen remains undetermined. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of CCRT with paclitaxel-based or S-1 regimens in treating elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>From January 2016 to November 2022, a total of 349 patients aged 70 and above with ESCC were included. The patient population was divided into two treatment groups: patients receiving paclitaxel-based CCRT were allocated to the TP group, and those receiving S-1 regimen CCRT were allocated to the S-1 group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance potential biases. Survival outcomes, overall response rate, and treatment-related toxicities were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After PSM, there were 82 patients in each group. The median follow up of the surviving patients was 42.6 months (IQR 28.0–58.8 months). The 2-year overall survival (OS) rate (71.4% vs 65.4%; log-rank <em>P</em> = 0.010) and progression-free survival (PFS) rate (64.4% vs 58.0%; log-rank <em>P</em> = 0.048) were significantly higher in the TP group. Compared with the S-1 group, the TP group experienced a higher rate of grade 3 and above hematologic toxicities, such as leukopenia (47.6% vs 15.9%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and neutropenia (35.4% vs 6.1%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). One patient in the TP group and two patients in the S-1 group had grade 5 toxic effects.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings suggest that paclitaxel-based CCRT was well tolerated in elderly patients with ESCC and provided significant survival benefits over S-1 regimen.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Oncology\",\"volume\":\"50 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193652332400250X/pdfft?md5=4201e3c09f1e50c74b2414b9c43fffc3&pid=1-s2.0-S193652332400250X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193652332400250X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193652332400250X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景老年食管癌患者可从同期化放疗(CCRT)中获益。然而,最佳的同期化疗方案仍未确定。我们旨在比较CCRT与基于紫杉醇或S-1方案治疗老年食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者的疗效和安全性。方法从2016年1月至2022年11月,共纳入349例70岁及以上的ESCC患者。患者分为两个治疗组:接受紫杉醇为基础的CCRT的患者被分配到TP组,接受S-1方案CCRT的患者被分配到S-1组。采用倾向评分匹配法(PSM)来平衡潜在的偏倚。对生存结果、总体反应率和治疗相关毒性反应进行了评估。存活患者的中位随访时间为 42.6 个月(IQR 28.0-58.8 个月)。TP组的2年总生存率(71.4% vs 65.4%;log-rank P = 0.010)和无进展生存率(64.4% vs 58.0%;log-rank P = 0.048)明显高于S-1组。与 S-1 组相比,TP 组出现 3 级及以上血液学毒性的比例更高,如白细胞减少症(47.6% vs 15.9%,P < 0.001)和中性粒细胞减少症(35.4% vs 6.1%,P < 0.001)。结论我们的研究结果表明,以紫杉醇为基础的CCRT在老年ESCC患者中耐受性良好,与S-1方案相比生存率显著提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel-based or S-1 regimens in treating elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A multi-center propensity-score matched study

Background

Elderly patients with esophageal cancer can benefit from concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). However, the optimal concurrent chemotherapy regimen remains undetermined. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of CCRT with paclitaxel-based or S-1 regimens in treating elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

From January 2016 to November 2022, a total of 349 patients aged 70 and above with ESCC were included. The patient population was divided into two treatment groups: patients receiving paclitaxel-based CCRT were allocated to the TP group, and those receiving S-1 regimen CCRT were allocated to the S-1 group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance potential biases. Survival outcomes, overall response rate, and treatment-related toxicities were assessed.

Results

After PSM, there were 82 patients in each group. The median follow up of the surviving patients was 42.6 months (IQR 28.0–58.8 months). The 2-year overall survival (OS) rate (71.4% vs 65.4%; log-rank P = 0.010) and progression-free survival (PFS) rate (64.4% vs 58.0%; log-rank P = 0.048) were significantly higher in the TP group. Compared with the S-1 group, the TP group experienced a higher rate of grade 3 and above hematologic toxicities, such as leukopenia (47.6% vs 15.9%, P < 0.001) and neutropenia (35.4% vs 6.1%, P < 0.001). One patient in the TP group and two patients in the S-1 group had grade 5 toxic effects.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that paclitaxel-based CCRT was well tolerated in elderly patients with ESCC and provided significant survival benefits over S-1 regimen.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.00%
发文量
314
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Translational Oncology publishes the results of novel research investigations which bridge the laboratory and clinical settings including risk assessment, cellular and molecular characterization, prevention, detection, diagnosis and treatment of human cancers with the overall goal of improving the clinical care of oncology patients. Translational Oncology will publish laboratory studies of novel therapeutic interventions as well as clinical trials which evaluate new treatment paradigms for cancer. Peer reviewed manuscript types include Original Reports, Reviews and Editorials.
期刊最新文献
Clinical efficacies of different neoadjuvant therapies for non-small cell lung cancer Integrated multi-omics demonstrates enhanced antitumor efficacy of donafenib combined with FADS2 inhibition in hepatocellular carcinoma Disruption of bioenergetics enhances the radio-sensitivity of patient-derived glioblastoma tumorspheres KRas plays a negative role in regulating IDO1 expression Comparative transcriptomic analysis uncovers molecular heterogeneity in hepatobiliary cancers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1