{"title":"姑息关怀干预对社区成人心力衰竭患者报告结果和全因死亡率的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Current evidence that supports palliative care interventions predominantly focuses on individuals with cancer or hospitalized patients. However, the effectiveness of palliative care on patient-reported outcomes and mortality in community-dwelling adults with heart failure has not been evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of palliative care interventions on patient-reported outcomes and all-cause mortality in community-dwelling adults with heart failure.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases were searched from inception to October 2023. Randomized controlled trials were considered if they compared palliative care interventions with usual care, attention control, or waiting-list control primarily in a community-dwelling heart failure patient population. The primary outcome was patient-reported generic health-related or heart failure-specific quality of life. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported symptom burden, psychological health (anxiety and depression), spiritual well-being, and all-cause mortality. Two independent reviewers screened the retrieved articles and extracted data from the included studies. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to pool the data, followed by sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and meta-regression. All analyses were performed using R version 4.2.2.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eleven eligible studies were included in this review with a total of 1535 patients. Compared to usual care, palliative care interventions demonstrated statistically significant effects on improving generic health-related quality of life (SMD, 0.30 [95 % CI, 0.12 to 0.48]) and heart failure-specific quality of life (SMD, 0.17 [95 % CI, 0.03 to 0.31]). Palliative care interventions also reduced anxiety (SMD, −<!--> <!-->0.22 [95 % CI, −<!--> <!-->0.40 to −<!--> <!-->0.05]) and depression (SMD, −<!--> <!-->0.18 [95 % CI, −<!--> <!-->0.33 to −<!--> <!-->0.03]), and enhanced spiritual well-being (SMD, 0.43 [95 % CI, 0.05 to 0.81]), without adversely affecting all-cause mortality (RR, 1.00 [95 % CI, 0.76 to 1.33]). Yet, the interventions had no significant effects on symptom burden (SMD, −<!--> <!-->0.09 [95 % CI, −<!--> <!-->0.40 to 0.21]). The certainty of evidence across the outcomes ranged from very low to moderate based on the GRADE approach.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Palliative care interventions are beneficial for community-dwelling adults with heart failure in that the interventions improved patient-reported quality of life, psychological health, and spiritual well-being, and importantly, did not lead to higher mortality rates. Findings of this review support the implementation of palliative care for adults with heart failure in community settings.</p></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><p>CRD42023482495.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of palliative care interventions on patient-reported outcomes and all-cause mortality in community-dwelling adults with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Current evidence that supports palliative care interventions predominantly focuses on individuals with cancer or hospitalized patients. However, the effectiveness of palliative care on patient-reported outcomes and mortality in community-dwelling adults with heart failure has not been evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of palliative care interventions on patient-reported outcomes and all-cause mortality in community-dwelling adults with heart failure.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases were searched from inception to October 2023. Randomized controlled trials were considered if they compared palliative care interventions with usual care, attention control, or waiting-list control primarily in a community-dwelling heart failure patient population. The primary outcome was patient-reported generic health-related or heart failure-specific quality of life. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported symptom burden, psychological health (anxiety and depression), spiritual well-being, and all-cause mortality. Two independent reviewers screened the retrieved articles and extracted data from the included studies. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to pool the data, followed by sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and meta-regression. All analyses were performed using R version 4.2.2.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eleven eligible studies were included in this review with a total of 1535 patients. Compared to usual care, palliative care interventions demonstrated statistically significant effects on improving generic health-related quality of life (SMD, 0.30 [95 % CI, 0.12 to 0.48]) and heart failure-specific quality of life (SMD, 0.17 [95 % CI, 0.03 to 0.31]). Palliative care interventions also reduced anxiety (SMD, −<!--> <!-->0.22 [95 % CI, −<!--> <!-->0.40 to −<!--> <!-->0.05]) and depression (SMD, −<!--> <!-->0.18 [95 % CI, −<!--> <!-->0.33 to −<!--> <!-->0.03]), and enhanced spiritual well-being (SMD, 0.43 [95 % CI, 0.05 to 0.81]), without adversely affecting all-cause mortality (RR, 1.00 [95 % CI, 0.76 to 1.33]). Yet, the interventions had no significant effects on symptom burden (SMD, −<!--> <!-->0.09 [95 % CI, −<!--> <!-->0.40 to 0.21]). The certainty of evidence across the outcomes ranged from very low to moderate based on the GRADE approach.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Palliative care interventions are beneficial for community-dwelling adults with heart failure in that the interventions improved patient-reported quality of life, psychological health, and spiritual well-being, and importantly, did not lead to higher mortality rates. Findings of this review support the implementation of palliative care for adults with heart failure in community settings.</p></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><p>CRD42023482495.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748924002001\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748924002001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effectiveness of palliative care interventions on patient-reported outcomes and all-cause mortality in community-dwelling adults with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background
Current evidence that supports palliative care interventions predominantly focuses on individuals with cancer or hospitalized patients. However, the effectiveness of palliative care on patient-reported outcomes and mortality in community-dwelling adults with heart failure has not been evaluated.
Objective
We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of palliative care interventions on patient-reported outcomes and all-cause mortality in community-dwelling adults with heart failure.
Design
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Methods
MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases were searched from inception to October 2023. Randomized controlled trials were considered if they compared palliative care interventions with usual care, attention control, or waiting-list control primarily in a community-dwelling heart failure patient population. The primary outcome was patient-reported generic health-related or heart failure-specific quality of life. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported symptom burden, psychological health (anxiety and depression), spiritual well-being, and all-cause mortality. Two independent reviewers screened the retrieved articles and extracted data from the included studies. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to pool the data, followed by sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and meta-regression. All analyses were performed using R version 4.2.2.
Results
Eleven eligible studies were included in this review with a total of 1535 patients. Compared to usual care, palliative care interventions demonstrated statistically significant effects on improving generic health-related quality of life (SMD, 0.30 [95 % CI, 0.12 to 0.48]) and heart failure-specific quality of life (SMD, 0.17 [95 % CI, 0.03 to 0.31]). Palliative care interventions also reduced anxiety (SMD, − 0.22 [95 % CI, − 0.40 to − 0.05]) and depression (SMD, − 0.18 [95 % CI, − 0.33 to − 0.03]), and enhanced spiritual well-being (SMD, 0.43 [95 % CI, 0.05 to 0.81]), without adversely affecting all-cause mortality (RR, 1.00 [95 % CI, 0.76 to 1.33]). Yet, the interventions had no significant effects on symptom burden (SMD, − 0.09 [95 % CI, − 0.40 to 0.21]). The certainty of evidence across the outcomes ranged from very low to moderate based on the GRADE approach.
Conclusions
Palliative care interventions are beneficial for community-dwelling adults with heart failure in that the interventions improved patient-reported quality of life, psychological health, and spiritual well-being, and importantly, did not lead to higher mortality rates. Findings of this review support the implementation of palliative care for adults with heart failure in community settings.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Nursing Studies (IJNS) is a highly respected journal that has been publishing original peer-reviewed articles since 1963. It provides a forum for original research and scholarship about health care delivery, organisation, management, workforce, policy, and research methods relevant to nursing, midwifery, and other health related professions. The journal aims to support evidence informed policy and practice by publishing research, systematic and other scholarly reviews, critical discussion, and commentary of the highest standard. The IJNS is indexed in major databases including PubMed, Medline, Thomson Reuters - Science Citation Index, Scopus, Thomson Reuters - Social Science Citation Index, CINAHL, and the BNI (British Nursing Index).