验证用于法医缉获药物筛查的快速气相色谱-质谱法

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Forensic Chemistry Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1016/j.forc.2024.100609
Briana A. Capistran , Edward Sisco
{"title":"验证用于法医缉获药物筛查的快速气相色谱-质谱法","authors":"Briana A. Capistran ,&nbsp;Edward Sisco","doi":"10.1016/j.forc.2024.100609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the lack of standardized validation protocols across the forensic chemistry community, validation of instrumentation can be a challenging and time-consuming task. However, this process is crucial to understanding the associated capabilities and limitations, especially for nascent technologies. Rapid GC–MS is one such emerging analytical technique being increasingly implemented in forensic laboratories due to its fast and informative screening capabilities. However, a full validation for forensic samples has yet to be published since its debut. This work presents the results of a comprehensive validation of a rapid GC–MS system for seized drug screening through the assessment of nine components: selectivity, matrix effects, precision, accuracy, range, carryover/contamination, robustness, ruggedness, and stability. Single- and/or multi-compound test solutions of commonly encountered seized drug compounds were used to assess method and system performance. Results met the designated acceptance criteria for a majority of components. For example, retention time and mass spectral search score % RSDs were ≤10 % for precision and robustness studies. Limitations were identified for components that did not meet the acceptance criteria (<em>e.g.</em>, inability to differentiate some isomers). The study design is part of a larger validation package developed for rapid GC–MS that includes a validation plan and automated workbook. The template, available for adoption by laboratories, ultimately aims to reduce the barrier of implementation for rapid GC–MS technology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":324,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Chemistry","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100609"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a rapid GC–MS method for forensic seized drug screening applications\",\"authors\":\"Briana A. Capistran ,&nbsp;Edward Sisco\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forc.2024.100609\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>With the lack of standardized validation protocols across the forensic chemistry community, validation of instrumentation can be a challenging and time-consuming task. However, this process is crucial to understanding the associated capabilities and limitations, especially for nascent technologies. Rapid GC–MS is one such emerging analytical technique being increasingly implemented in forensic laboratories due to its fast and informative screening capabilities. However, a full validation for forensic samples has yet to be published since its debut. This work presents the results of a comprehensive validation of a rapid GC–MS system for seized drug screening through the assessment of nine components: selectivity, matrix effects, precision, accuracy, range, carryover/contamination, robustness, ruggedness, and stability. Single- and/or multi-compound test solutions of commonly encountered seized drug compounds were used to assess method and system performance. Results met the designated acceptance criteria for a majority of components. For example, retention time and mass spectral search score % RSDs were ≤10 % for precision and robustness studies. Limitations were identified for components that did not meet the acceptance criteria (<em>e.g.</em>, inability to differentiate some isomers). The study design is part of a larger validation package developed for rapid GC–MS that includes a validation plan and automated workbook. The template, available for adoption by laboratories, ultimately aims to reduce the barrier of implementation for rapid GC–MS technology.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100609\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170924000614\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170924000614","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于法医化学界缺乏标准化的验证协议,仪器验证可能是一项具有挑战性且耗时的任务。然而,这一过程对于了解相关能力和局限性至关重要,尤其是对于新兴技术而言。快速气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)就是这样一种新兴的分析技术,因其快速、信息量大的筛选能力而越来越多地应用于法医实验室。然而,自其问世以来,针对法医样本的全面验证尚未公布。本研究通过对选择性、基质效应、精确性、准确性、范围、携带/污染、稳健性、坚固性和稳定性等九个方面的评估,展示了用于缉获毒品筛查的快速气相色谱-质谱系统的全面验证结果。使用常见缉获毒品化合物的单化合物和/或多化合物测试溶液来评估方法和系统性能。大多数成分的结果都符合指定的验收标准。例如,在精确度和稳健性研究中,保留时间和质谱搜索得分 RSD ≤10 %。对于不符合验收标准的成分(如无法区分某些异构体),则确定了其局限性。该研究设计是为快速气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)开发的大型验证包的一部分,其中包括验证计划和自动工作手册。该模板可供实验室采用,最终目的是减少快速气相色谱-质谱技术的实施障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of a rapid GC–MS method for forensic seized drug screening applications

With the lack of standardized validation protocols across the forensic chemistry community, validation of instrumentation can be a challenging and time-consuming task. However, this process is crucial to understanding the associated capabilities and limitations, especially for nascent technologies. Rapid GC–MS is one such emerging analytical technique being increasingly implemented in forensic laboratories due to its fast and informative screening capabilities. However, a full validation for forensic samples has yet to be published since its debut. This work presents the results of a comprehensive validation of a rapid GC–MS system for seized drug screening through the assessment of nine components: selectivity, matrix effects, precision, accuracy, range, carryover/contamination, robustness, ruggedness, and stability. Single- and/or multi-compound test solutions of commonly encountered seized drug compounds were used to assess method and system performance. Results met the designated acceptance criteria for a majority of components. For example, retention time and mass spectral search score % RSDs were ≤10 % for precision and robustness studies. Limitations were identified for components that did not meet the acceptance criteria (e.g., inability to differentiate some isomers). The study design is part of a larger validation package developed for rapid GC–MS that includes a validation plan and automated workbook. The template, available for adoption by laboratories, ultimately aims to reduce the barrier of implementation for rapid GC–MS technology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic Chemistry
Forensic Chemistry CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
14.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Chemistry publishes high quality manuscripts focusing on the theory, research and application of any chemical science to forensic analysis. The scope of the journal includes fundamental advancements that result in a better understanding of the evidentiary significance derived from the physical and chemical analysis of materials. The scope of Forensic Chemistry will also include the application and or development of any molecular and atomic spectrochemical technique, electrochemical techniques, sensors, surface characterization techniques, mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, chemometrics and statistics, and separation sciences (e.g. chromatography) that provide insight into the forensic analysis of materials. Evidential topics of interest to the journal include, but are not limited to, fingerprint analysis, drug analysis, ignitable liquid residue analysis, explosives detection and analysis, the characterization and comparison of trace evidence (glass, fibers, paints and polymers, tapes, soils and other materials), ink and paper analysis, gunshot residue analysis, synthetic pathways for drugs, toxicology and the analysis and chemistry associated with the components of fingermarks. The journal is particularly interested in receiving manuscripts that report advances in the forensic interpretation of chemical evidence. Technology Readiness Level: When submitting an article to Forensic Chemistry, all authors will be asked to self-assign a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) to their article. The purpose of the TRL system is to help readers understand the level of maturity of an idea or method, to help track the evolution of readiness of a given technique or method, and to help filter published articles by the expected ease of implementation in an operation setting within a crime lab.
期刊最新文献
Development and evaluation of a nontargeted electrochemical surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (EC-SERS) screening method applied to forensic seized drug casework samples Observation of chromatographic differences by non-specialist viewers for one-dimensional gas chromatography and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography output Assessment of two benzylation strategies for the analysis of nerve-agent derived ethyl- and pinacolyl methyl phosphonic acids in sandy loam soil by GC–MS Portable near-infrared detection to replace color tests in an analytical scheme for forensic drug identification Halogen-bond mediated charge transfer for visual competitive colorimetric detection of fentanyl
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1