Elena Achótegui Sebastián, Carlos Calhaz-Jorge, Christian De Geyter, Thomas Ebner, Carlos E Plancha, Veerle Goossens, Anja Pinborg, Nikolaos P Polyzos, Laura Rossignoli, Ioana Adina Rugescu, Jesper Smeenk, Thomas Strowitzki, Johanna Tassot, Edgar V Mocanu, Nathalie Vermeulen, Christine Wyns, M Cristina Magli
{"title":"EuMAR 利益攸关方参与:欧盟国家医疗辅助生殖 (MAR) 数据收集做法分析","authors":"Elena Achótegui Sebastián, Carlos Calhaz-Jorge, Christian De Geyter, Thomas Ebner, Carlos E Plancha, Veerle Goossens, Anja Pinborg, Nikolaos P Polyzos, Laura Rossignoli, Ioana Adina Rugescu, Jesper Smeenk, Thomas Strowitzki, Johanna Tassot, Edgar V Mocanu, Nathalie Vermeulen, Christine Wyns, M Cristina Magli","doi":"10.1093/humrep/deae209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"STUDY QUESTION What are the current national medically assisted reproduction (MAR) data collection systems across EU Member States, and how can these countries contribute to a unique, cycle-by-cycle registry for the European Monitoring of Medically Assisted Reproduction (EuMAR) project? SUMMARY ANSWER The study identified significant variation in MAR data collection practices across Member States, with differences in data types, collection methods, and reporting requirements; the EuMAR project emerges as an opportunity to enhance data standardization and improve MAR data collection in the EU. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY There is a need for new approaches in MAR data collection that include long-term and cross border follow-up. The EuMAR project intends to establish a unified, cycle-by-cycle registry of data on MAR treatments in EU countries, from which accurate cumulative outcomes can be calculated. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This cross-sectional study involved a survey and interviews with stakeholders from 26 EU Member States conducted in 2023 over a period of seven months. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Representatives from national competent authorities and professional associations involved in MAR data collection in EU countries were invited to complete the survey and interviewed to assess current data flows, information requirements, and their interest in the EuMAR project. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Half of the participating countries reported having a national MAR registry with cycle-by-cycle data (n = 13), while 31% reported having a national registry with aggregated data (n = 8) and 19% reported having no national registry (n = 5). Of the countries with a national cycle-by-cycle registry, eight countries collect identifiable data, five countries collect pseudonymized data, and one country collects fully anonymized data. Informed consent is required in 10 countries. The main advantages that participants expected from a European registry like EuMAR were the possibility of obtaining national statistics in the absence of a national registry and improving the calculation of cumulative outcomes. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The results of the study are based on self-reported data, which may be subject to bias, however, the validity of the collected information was verified with different means, including follow-up calls for clarifications and sharing final transcript reports. The feasibility of the proposed data flow models will be tested in a pilot study. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Despite the heterogeneity of data collection practices across EU countries, the results show that stakeholders have high expectations of the benefits that the EuMAR registry can bring, namely the improvement of data consistency, cross-border comparability, and cumulative live birth rates, leading to better information for patients, health care providers and policy makers. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The EuMAR project was co-founded by ESHRE and the European Commission (101079865—EuMAR–EU4H-2021-PJ2). No competing interests were declared. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.","PeriodicalId":13003,"journal":{"name":"Human reproduction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EuMAR stakeholder engagement: an analysis of medically assisted reproduction (MAR) data collection practices in EU countries\",\"authors\":\"Elena Achótegui Sebastián, Carlos Calhaz-Jorge, Christian De Geyter, Thomas Ebner, Carlos E Plancha, Veerle Goossens, Anja Pinborg, Nikolaos P Polyzos, Laura Rossignoli, Ioana Adina Rugescu, Jesper Smeenk, Thomas Strowitzki, Johanna Tassot, Edgar V Mocanu, Nathalie Vermeulen, Christine Wyns, M Cristina Magli\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/humrep/deae209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"STUDY QUESTION What are the current national medically assisted reproduction (MAR) data collection systems across EU Member States, and how can these countries contribute to a unique, cycle-by-cycle registry for the European Monitoring of Medically Assisted Reproduction (EuMAR) project? SUMMARY ANSWER The study identified significant variation in MAR data collection practices across Member States, with differences in data types, collection methods, and reporting requirements; the EuMAR project emerges as an opportunity to enhance data standardization and improve MAR data collection in the EU. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY There is a need for new approaches in MAR data collection that include long-term and cross border follow-up. The EuMAR project intends to establish a unified, cycle-by-cycle registry of data on MAR treatments in EU countries, from which accurate cumulative outcomes can be calculated. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This cross-sectional study involved a survey and interviews with stakeholders from 26 EU Member States conducted in 2023 over a period of seven months. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Representatives from national competent authorities and professional associations involved in MAR data collection in EU countries were invited to complete the survey and interviewed to assess current data flows, information requirements, and their interest in the EuMAR project. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Half of the participating countries reported having a national MAR registry with cycle-by-cycle data (n = 13), while 31% reported having a national registry with aggregated data (n = 8) and 19% reported having no national registry (n = 5). Of the countries with a national cycle-by-cycle registry, eight countries collect identifiable data, five countries collect pseudonymized data, and one country collects fully anonymized data. Informed consent is required in 10 countries. The main advantages that participants expected from a European registry like EuMAR were the possibility of obtaining national statistics in the absence of a national registry and improving the calculation of cumulative outcomes. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The results of the study are based on self-reported data, which may be subject to bias, however, the validity of the collected information was verified with different means, including follow-up calls for clarifications and sharing final transcript reports. The feasibility of the proposed data flow models will be tested in a pilot study. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Despite the heterogeneity of data collection practices across EU countries, the results show that stakeholders have high expectations of the benefits that the EuMAR registry can bring, namely the improvement of data consistency, cross-border comparability, and cumulative live birth rates, leading to better information for patients, health care providers and policy makers. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The EuMAR project was co-founded by ESHRE and the European Commission (101079865—EuMAR–EU4H-2021-PJ2). No competing interests were declared. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human reproduction\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human reproduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deae209\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deae209","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究问题 目前欧盟各成员国的国家医疗辅助生殖(MAR)数据收集系统如何,这些国家如何为欧洲医疗辅助生殖监测(EuMAR)项目的独特、逐周期登记做出贡献?简要回答 研究发现,各成员国在 MAR 数据收集做法上存在很大差异,数据类型、收集方法和报告要求也不尽相同;EuMAR 项目是加强欧盟数据标准化和改进 MAR 数据收集的一个机会。现有知识 在 MAR 数据收集方面需要新的方法,包括长期和跨境跟踪。EuMAR 项目旨在建立一个统一的、逐周期的欧盟国家 MAR 治疗数据登记册,并从中计算出准确的累积结果。研究设计、规模和持续时间 这项横断面研究涉及一项调查,并在 2023 年对来自 26 个欧盟成员国的利益相关者进行了为期 7 个月的访谈。受试者/材料、环境、方法 来自欧盟国家参与 MAR 数据收集的国家主管机构和专业协会的代表受邀完成了调查和访谈,以评估当前的数据流、信息要求以及他们对 EuMAR 项目的兴趣。主要结果和机会的作用 参与调查的国家中,有一半报告称已建立了国家逐周期 MAR 数据登记册(13 个国家),31% 报告称已建立了国家汇总数据登记册(8 个国家),19% 报告称未建立国家登记册(5 个国家)。在拥有国家逐周期登记册的国家中,8 个国家收集可识别数据,5 个国家收集化名数据,1 个国家收集完全匿名的数据。有 10 个国家要求获得知情同意。与会者期望欧洲登记处(如 EuMAR)带来的主要优势是,在没有国家登记处的情况下也能获得国家统计数据,并改进累积结果的计算。局限性、注意事项 研究结果基于自我报告的数据,可能存在偏差,但已通过不同方式验证了所收集信息的有效性,包括后续电话澄清和共享最终成绩单报告。建议的数据流模型的可行性将在试点研究中进行测试。研究结果的广泛影响 尽管欧盟各国的数据收集方法不尽相同,但研究结果表明,利益相关者对 EuMAR 登记册所能带来的益处抱有很高的期望,即提高数据的一致性、跨国可比性和累积活产率,从而为患者、医疗服务提供者和政策制定者提供更好的信息。研究经费/合作利益 EuMAR 项目由 ESHRE 和欧盟委员会(101079865-EuMAR-EU4H-2021-PJ2)共同发起。未申报任何竞争利益。试验注册号 n/a。
EuMAR stakeholder engagement: an analysis of medically assisted reproduction (MAR) data collection practices in EU countries
STUDY QUESTION What are the current national medically assisted reproduction (MAR) data collection systems across EU Member States, and how can these countries contribute to a unique, cycle-by-cycle registry for the European Monitoring of Medically Assisted Reproduction (EuMAR) project? SUMMARY ANSWER The study identified significant variation in MAR data collection practices across Member States, with differences in data types, collection methods, and reporting requirements; the EuMAR project emerges as an opportunity to enhance data standardization and improve MAR data collection in the EU. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY There is a need for new approaches in MAR data collection that include long-term and cross border follow-up. The EuMAR project intends to establish a unified, cycle-by-cycle registry of data on MAR treatments in EU countries, from which accurate cumulative outcomes can be calculated. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This cross-sectional study involved a survey and interviews with stakeholders from 26 EU Member States conducted in 2023 over a period of seven months. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Representatives from national competent authorities and professional associations involved in MAR data collection in EU countries were invited to complete the survey and interviewed to assess current data flows, information requirements, and their interest in the EuMAR project. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Half of the participating countries reported having a national MAR registry with cycle-by-cycle data (n = 13), while 31% reported having a national registry with aggregated data (n = 8) and 19% reported having no national registry (n = 5). Of the countries with a national cycle-by-cycle registry, eight countries collect identifiable data, five countries collect pseudonymized data, and one country collects fully anonymized data. Informed consent is required in 10 countries. The main advantages that participants expected from a European registry like EuMAR were the possibility of obtaining national statistics in the absence of a national registry and improving the calculation of cumulative outcomes. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The results of the study are based on self-reported data, which may be subject to bias, however, the validity of the collected information was verified with different means, including follow-up calls for clarifications and sharing final transcript reports. The feasibility of the proposed data flow models will be tested in a pilot study. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Despite the heterogeneity of data collection practices across EU countries, the results show that stakeholders have high expectations of the benefits that the EuMAR registry can bring, namely the improvement of data consistency, cross-border comparability, and cumulative live birth rates, leading to better information for patients, health care providers and policy makers. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The EuMAR project was co-founded by ESHRE and the European Commission (101079865—EuMAR–EU4H-2021-PJ2). No competing interests were declared. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
期刊介绍:
Human Reproduction features full-length, peer-reviewed papers reporting original research, concise clinical case reports, as well as opinions and debates on topical issues.
Papers published cover the clinical science and medical aspects of reproductive physiology, pathology and endocrinology; including andrology, gonad function, gametogenesis, fertilization, embryo development, implantation, early pregnancy, genetics, genetic diagnosis, oncology, infectious disease, surgery, contraception, infertility treatment, psychology, ethics and social issues.