消费者再次称赞公用事业,但仍需努力

IF 0.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal ‐ American Water Works Association Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1002/awwa.2331
Adam T. Carpenter, Carita Parks
{"title":"消费者再次称赞公用事业,但仍需努力","authors":"Adam T. Carpenter,&nbsp;Carita Parks","doi":"10.1002/awwa.2331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Since 2020, AWWA has commissioned an annual study of public confidence in drinking water. This study has provided valuable context and insight into how the public feels about water utilities.</p><p>The numbers could be even better. Evidence shows that proactive communication from utilities works. Those who recall receiving recent communication (other than a bill) from their utility gave higher ratings to their utilities and their water on many different metrics, and we’ve seen this for several years in a row.</p><p>It is likely proactive communication will better instill confidence than letting someone else take the narrative. Although we can only demonstrate correlation and not causation, there's reason to think that hearing information from a trusted source helps increase confidence.</p><p>Another area for improvement is closing the gap in ratings among Hispanic and Black respondents compared with White respondents, although Hispanic respondents’ ratings edged higher overall this year. This gap presents an opportunity to ensure all groups are receiving the same level of service as well as further targeted outreach and education.</p><p>Other SDWA-related questions were harder to interpret. When presented with the statement “The Safe Drinking Water Act has effectively regulated drinking water for the past 50 years,” while considerably more agreed (55%) than disagreed (14%), nearly a third (30%) did not know or had no opinion. Given the complexity of federal laws and regulations, these results are not so surprising and likely represent unfamiliarity with SDWA regulations. This suggests another topic utilities could further educate their consumers about.</p><p>Similar uncertainty was seen in responses to statements such as “Water utilities will show resilience in light of extreme events and climate change” and “Water utilities are prepared to face the challenges that they will see in the future.” This uncertainty represents key opportunities to talk about current activities and future plans with the public.</p><p>Utilities are encouraged to review all the detailed results and use them to gather insights on the national picture of public confidence and use that as context for inquiry and engagement in their own communities. We encourage readers to view the press release, infographic, and AWWA's Value of Water page.</p><p>Throughout the year, we receive questions on how the survey was conducted. We hired a top polling firm, Morning Consult (MC), who walks us through the whole process for each study, making sure we ask questions free from avoidable bias, and seeks to provide meaningful insights. The survey is nationally representative per MC's methodology used in hundreds of other surveys. The more than 2,000 respondents did not know the survey's sponsor and had self-reported, before taking the survey, that they were served by a water utility.</p><p>This survey also has some limits, of course. It is nationally representative by key demographics, but water utilities themselves are not distributed in exactly the same ways as customers are. Also, we lack information about the compliance history or other key characteristics about the utilities serving these customers. Instead, this is a perceptions survey and relies on what the public thinks and feels about the utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":14785,"journal":{"name":"Journal ‐ American Water Works Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/awwa.2331","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consumers Again Praise Utilities, But Work Remains\",\"authors\":\"Adam T. Carpenter,&nbsp;Carita Parks\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/awwa.2331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Since 2020, AWWA has commissioned an annual study of public confidence in drinking water. This study has provided valuable context and insight into how the public feels about water utilities.</p><p>The numbers could be even better. Evidence shows that proactive communication from utilities works. Those who recall receiving recent communication (other than a bill) from their utility gave higher ratings to their utilities and their water on many different metrics, and we’ve seen this for several years in a row.</p><p>It is likely proactive communication will better instill confidence than letting someone else take the narrative. Although we can only demonstrate correlation and not causation, there's reason to think that hearing information from a trusted source helps increase confidence.</p><p>Another area for improvement is closing the gap in ratings among Hispanic and Black respondents compared with White respondents, although Hispanic respondents’ ratings edged higher overall this year. This gap presents an opportunity to ensure all groups are receiving the same level of service as well as further targeted outreach and education.</p><p>Other SDWA-related questions were harder to interpret. When presented with the statement “The Safe Drinking Water Act has effectively regulated drinking water for the past 50 years,” while considerably more agreed (55%) than disagreed (14%), nearly a third (30%) did not know or had no opinion. Given the complexity of federal laws and regulations, these results are not so surprising and likely represent unfamiliarity with SDWA regulations. This suggests another topic utilities could further educate their consumers about.</p><p>Similar uncertainty was seen in responses to statements such as “Water utilities will show resilience in light of extreme events and climate change” and “Water utilities are prepared to face the challenges that they will see in the future.” This uncertainty represents key opportunities to talk about current activities and future plans with the public.</p><p>Utilities are encouraged to review all the detailed results and use them to gather insights on the national picture of public confidence and use that as context for inquiry and engagement in their own communities. We encourage readers to view the press release, infographic, and AWWA's Value of Water page.</p><p>Throughout the year, we receive questions on how the survey was conducted. We hired a top polling firm, Morning Consult (MC), who walks us through the whole process for each study, making sure we ask questions free from avoidable bias, and seeks to provide meaningful insights. The survey is nationally representative per MC's methodology used in hundreds of other surveys. The more than 2,000 respondents did not know the survey's sponsor and had self-reported, before taking the survey, that they were served by a water utility.</p><p>This survey also has some limits, of course. It is nationally representative by key demographics, but water utilities themselves are not distributed in exactly the same ways as customers are. Also, we lack information about the compliance history or other key characteristics about the utilities serving these customers. Instead, this is a perceptions survey and relies on what the public thinks and feels about the utility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal ‐ American Water Works Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/awwa.2331\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal ‐ American Water Works Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/awwa.2331\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal ‐ American Water Works Association","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/awwa.2331","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自 2020 年以来,AWWA 每年都会委托开展一项有关公众对饮用水信心的研究。这项研究为了解公众对供水公司的看法提供了宝贵的背景和见解。有证据表明,供水公司的主动沟通是有效的。那些记得最近收到过自来水公司沟通信息(账单除外)的人在许多不同的指标上对自来水公司和自来水给予了更高的评价,而且我们已经连续几年看到这种情况。虽然我们只能证明相关性而非因果关系,但我们有理由认为,从可信来源获得信息有助于增强信心。另一个需要改进的方面是缩小西班牙裔和黑人受访者与白人受访者之间的评分差距,尽管今年西班牙裔受访者的评分总体上有所上升。这一差距为确保所有群体获得同等水平的服务以及进一步开展有针对性的宣传和教育提供了机会。当问及 "过去 50 年来,《安全饮用水法》对饮用水进行了有效监管 "时,同意的人数(55%)大大多于不同意的人数(14%),近三分之一(30%)的人不知道或没有意见。鉴于联邦法律法规的复杂性,这些结果并不令人惊讶,而且很可能代表了对 SDWA 法规的不熟悉。对于 "水务公司将在极端事件和气候变化中表现出适应能力 "和 "水务公司已准备好面对未来的挑战 "等说法的回答也存在类似的不确定性。我们鼓励水务公司审查所有详细结果,并利用这些结果收集对全国公众信心状况的见解,并以此为背景在自己的社区开展调查和参与活动。我们鼓励读者查看新闻稿、信息图表和 AWWA 的 "水的价值 "网页。我们聘请了一家顶级民意调查公司 Morning Consult (MC),该公司会指导我们完成每项调查的整个过程,确保我们提出的问题不存在可避免的偏见,并力求提供有意义的见解。根据 MC 在数百项其他调查中使用的方法,本次调查具有全国代表性。2000 多名受访者不知道调查的发起人,他们在接受调查前都曾自称接受过自来水公司的服务。当然,这项调查也有一定的局限性,它在全国范围内的主要人口统计数据具有代表性,但供水公司本身的分布情况与用户的分布情况并不完全相同。此外,我们还缺乏有关为这些用户提供服务的供水公司的履约历史或其他关键特征的信息。相反,这是一项认知调查,依赖于公众对供水公司的看法和感受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consumers Again Praise Utilities, But Work Remains

Since 2020, AWWA has commissioned an annual study of public confidence in drinking water. This study has provided valuable context and insight into how the public feels about water utilities.

The numbers could be even better. Evidence shows that proactive communication from utilities works. Those who recall receiving recent communication (other than a bill) from their utility gave higher ratings to their utilities and their water on many different metrics, and we’ve seen this for several years in a row.

It is likely proactive communication will better instill confidence than letting someone else take the narrative. Although we can only demonstrate correlation and not causation, there's reason to think that hearing information from a trusted source helps increase confidence.

Another area for improvement is closing the gap in ratings among Hispanic and Black respondents compared with White respondents, although Hispanic respondents’ ratings edged higher overall this year. This gap presents an opportunity to ensure all groups are receiving the same level of service as well as further targeted outreach and education.

Other SDWA-related questions were harder to interpret. When presented with the statement “The Safe Drinking Water Act has effectively regulated drinking water for the past 50 years,” while considerably more agreed (55%) than disagreed (14%), nearly a third (30%) did not know or had no opinion. Given the complexity of federal laws and regulations, these results are not so surprising and likely represent unfamiliarity with SDWA regulations. This suggests another topic utilities could further educate their consumers about.

Similar uncertainty was seen in responses to statements such as “Water utilities will show resilience in light of extreme events and climate change” and “Water utilities are prepared to face the challenges that they will see in the future.” This uncertainty represents key opportunities to talk about current activities and future plans with the public.

Utilities are encouraged to review all the detailed results and use them to gather insights on the national picture of public confidence and use that as context for inquiry and engagement in their own communities. We encourage readers to view the press release, infographic, and AWWA's Value of Water page.

Throughout the year, we receive questions on how the survey was conducted. We hired a top polling firm, Morning Consult (MC), who walks us through the whole process for each study, making sure we ask questions free from avoidable bias, and seeks to provide meaningful insights. The survey is nationally representative per MC's methodology used in hundreds of other surveys. The more than 2,000 respondents did not know the survey's sponsor and had self-reported, before taking the survey, that they were served by a water utility.

This survey also has some limits, of course. It is nationally representative by key demographics, but water utilities themselves are not distributed in exactly the same ways as customers are. Also, we lack information about the compliance history or other key characteristics about the utilities serving these customers. Instead, this is a perceptions survey and relies on what the public thinks and feels about the utility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
28.60%
发文量
179
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal AWWA serves as the voice of the water industry and is an authoritative source of information for water professionals and the communities they serve. Journal AWWA provides an international forum for the industry’s thought and practice leaders to share their perspectives and experiences with the goal of continuous improvement of all water systems. Journal AWWA publishes articles about the water industry’s innovations, trends, controversies, and challenges, covering subjects such as public works planning, infrastructure management, human health, environmental protection, finance, and law. Journal AWWA will continue its long history of publishing in-depth and innovative articles on protecting the safety of our water, the reliability and resilience of our water systems, and the health of our environment and communities.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Educational Opportunities Standards Official Notice A One Water Approach Meets Regulatory Requirements, Increases Water Supply Resilience Industry News
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1