达尔齐的国家医疗服务体系审查显示了工党问题的严重性

The BMJ Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1136/bmj.q2032
Hugh Alderwick, Phoebe Dunn
{"title":"达尔齐的国家医疗服务体系审查显示了工党问题的严重性","authors":"Hugh Alderwick, Phoebe Dunn","doi":"10.1136/bmj.q2032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Findings may buy time but highlight government policy tensions Ara Darzi’s independent review into the performance of the NHS in England, commissioned soon after Labour’s election victory in July 2024, was published on 12 September.1 The idea was to provide a rapid assessment of the state of the health system—focusing on problems, not solutions. Darzi’s findings are intended to inform the government’s 10 year plan for reforming the English NHS—expected in spring next year.2 The report comes around 16 years after Darzi’s last review into the English NHS.3 Darzi paints a bleak picture of a health system in crisis.1 People are waiting too long for care in hospitals, primary care, mental health services—everywhere. Long waits in major hospital emergency departments are pulling at the social contract underpinning the NHS and likely to be contributing to thousands of additional deaths. Quality of care is mixed. And care in some areas, such as for people with cardiovascular disease, seems to be going in the wrong direction. The share of NHS resources going to hospitals is increasing, despite repeated political promises to do the opposite, and NHS productivity has stalled. The NHS’s problems …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Darzi’s NHS review shows depth of problems for Labour\",\"authors\":\"Hugh Alderwick, Phoebe Dunn\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmj.q2032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Findings may buy time but highlight government policy tensions Ara Darzi’s independent review into the performance of the NHS in England, commissioned soon after Labour’s election victory in July 2024, was published on 12 September.1 The idea was to provide a rapid assessment of the state of the health system—focusing on problems, not solutions. Darzi’s findings are intended to inform the government’s 10 year plan for reforming the English NHS—expected in spring next year.2 The report comes around 16 years after Darzi’s last review into the English NHS.3 Darzi paints a bleak picture of a health system in crisis.1 People are waiting too long for care in hospitals, primary care, mental health services—everywhere. Long waits in major hospital emergency departments are pulling at the social contract underpinning the NHS and likely to be contributing to thousands of additional deaths. Quality of care is mixed. And care in some areas, such as for people with cardiovascular disease, seems to be going in the wrong direction. The share of NHS resources going to hospitals is increasing, despite repeated political promises to do the opposite, and NHS productivity has stalled. The NHS’s problems …\",\"PeriodicalId\":22388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The BMJ\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The BMJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q2032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q2032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1 其目的是对医疗系统的状况进行快速评估,重点关注问题,而非解决方案。达齐的研究结果旨在为政府的英国国民医疗服务体系十年改革计划提供参考,该计划预计将于明年春季出台。2 该报告距离达齐上一次对英国国民医疗服务体系的审查已经过去了约 16 年。大医院急诊科的漫长等待正在破坏支撑英国国民医疗服务体系的社会契约,并可能导致数千人死亡。医疗质量参差不齐。某些领域的医疗服务,如对心血管疾病患者的治疗,似乎正朝着错误的方向发展。尽管政府一再承诺要反其道而行之,但医院在国民医疗服务系统资源中所占的份额却在不断增加,国民医疗服务系统的生产力也停滞不前。NHS 的问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Darzi’s NHS review shows depth of problems for Labour
Findings may buy time but highlight government policy tensions Ara Darzi’s independent review into the performance of the NHS in England, commissioned soon after Labour’s election victory in July 2024, was published on 12 September.1 The idea was to provide a rapid assessment of the state of the health system—focusing on problems, not solutions. Darzi’s findings are intended to inform the government’s 10 year plan for reforming the English NHS—expected in spring next year.2 The report comes around 16 years after Darzi’s last review into the English NHS.3 Darzi paints a bleak picture of a health system in crisis.1 People are waiting too long for care in hospitals, primary care, mental health services—everywhere. Long waits in major hospital emergency departments are pulling at the social contract underpinning the NHS and likely to be contributing to thousands of additional deaths. Quality of care is mixed. And care in some areas, such as for people with cardiovascular disease, seems to be going in the wrong direction. The share of NHS resources going to hospitals is increasing, despite repeated political promises to do the opposite, and NHS productivity has stalled. The NHS’s problems …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leprosy: Jordan becomes first country to eliminate disease. Partha Kar: We need honest, sensible conversation about physician associates-not false promises. Abolish NHS England and overhaul management to improve NHS productivity, says think tank. Optimising inhaled therapy for patients with asthma. Are India's regulatory gaps leaving patients with substandard mental health counsellors?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1