Timothy John Acosta , Yitian Guo , Jin Wang , Stefano Brusco , Gregory A. Kopp
{"title":"使用非维度湍流能量贡献进行部分湍流模拟的要求","authors":"Timothy John Acosta , Yitian Guo , Jin Wang , Stefano Brusco , Gregory A. Kopp","doi":"10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Quantifying turbulence effects is crucial for understanding building aerodynamics and for ensuring accurate wind tunnel test methods. This is especially important in wind tunnel methods that require post-experiment adjustments because approximate wind fields are used, such as the Partial Turbulence Simulation (PTS) approach. Understanding and analyzing these effects enables load adjustments since the PTS method only requires matching the high frequency portions of the upstream spectra of the longitudinal velocity component in model and full-scale. However, the limits for which the PTS method is applicable are unclear in terms of the allowable range of wind field characteristics that can be used in the wind tunnel simulation. To address this, the paper utilizes two nondimensional parameters, one representing the small-scale turbulence energy, E<sub>S</sub>, and the other the large-scale turbulence energy, E<sub>L</sub>, to elaborate the aerodynamic effects of turbulence intensity and integral length scales in the upstream wind. The results show that the maximum allowable mismatch ratio of integral length scales and of Jensen numbers between model and full-scale simulations depend on the target small-scale turbulence energy and the maximum allowable deviation of small-scale energy. By quantifying the effects of E<sub>S</sub> and E<sub>L</sub> on area-averaged pressure coefficients, the allowable limits are identified for wind tunnel test parameters that lead to negligible differences in the resultant pressure coefficient statistics in regions of separated-reattaching flow on the roof of a low-rise building.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54752,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 105886"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610524002496/pdfft?md5=2d3806fb3d750a5768da61fc1b0a2633&pid=1-s2.0-S0167610524002496-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Requirements for partial turbulence simulations using nondimensional turbulence energy contributions\",\"authors\":\"Timothy John Acosta , Yitian Guo , Jin Wang , Stefano Brusco , Gregory A. Kopp\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Quantifying turbulence effects is crucial for understanding building aerodynamics and for ensuring accurate wind tunnel test methods. This is especially important in wind tunnel methods that require post-experiment adjustments because approximate wind fields are used, such as the Partial Turbulence Simulation (PTS) approach. Understanding and analyzing these effects enables load adjustments since the PTS method only requires matching the high frequency portions of the upstream spectra of the longitudinal velocity component in model and full-scale. However, the limits for which the PTS method is applicable are unclear in terms of the allowable range of wind field characteristics that can be used in the wind tunnel simulation. To address this, the paper utilizes two nondimensional parameters, one representing the small-scale turbulence energy, E<sub>S</sub>, and the other the large-scale turbulence energy, E<sub>L</sub>, to elaborate the aerodynamic effects of turbulence intensity and integral length scales in the upstream wind. The results show that the maximum allowable mismatch ratio of integral length scales and of Jensen numbers between model and full-scale simulations depend on the target small-scale turbulence energy and the maximum allowable deviation of small-scale energy. By quantifying the effects of E<sub>S</sub> and E<sub>L</sub> on area-averaged pressure coefficients, the allowable limits are identified for wind tunnel test parameters that lead to negligible differences in the resultant pressure coefficient statistics in regions of separated-reattaching flow on the roof of a low-rise building.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics\",\"volume\":\"254 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105886\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610524002496/pdfft?md5=2d3806fb3d750a5768da61fc1b0a2633&pid=1-s2.0-S0167610524002496-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610524002496\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610524002496","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
量化湍流效应对于理解建筑空气动力学和确保风洞试验方法的准确性至关重要。这对于因使用近似风场而需要进行试验后调整的风洞试验方法尤为重要,例如部分湍流模拟(PTS)方法。了解和分析这些影响可实现载荷调整,因为 PTS 方法只要求模型和全尺寸纵向速度分量上游频谱的高频部分相匹配。然而,就风洞模拟中可使用的风场特性的允许范围而言,PTS 方法的适用范围并不明确。为了解决这个问题,本文采用了两个二维参数,一个代表小尺度湍流能量 ES,另一个代表大尺度湍流能量 EL,来阐述上游风中湍流强度和积分长度尺度对空气动力学的影响。结果表明,模型和全尺度模拟之间整体长度尺度和詹森数的最大允许不匹配比取决于目标小尺度湍流能量和小尺度能量的最大允许偏差。通过量化 ES 和 EL 对区域平均压力系数的影响,确定了风洞试验参数的允许极限,这些参数会导致低层建筑屋顶上的分离喘振流区域的压力系数统计结果出现可忽略不计的差异。
Requirements for partial turbulence simulations using nondimensional turbulence energy contributions
Quantifying turbulence effects is crucial for understanding building aerodynamics and for ensuring accurate wind tunnel test methods. This is especially important in wind tunnel methods that require post-experiment adjustments because approximate wind fields are used, such as the Partial Turbulence Simulation (PTS) approach. Understanding and analyzing these effects enables load adjustments since the PTS method only requires matching the high frequency portions of the upstream spectra of the longitudinal velocity component in model and full-scale. However, the limits for which the PTS method is applicable are unclear in terms of the allowable range of wind field characteristics that can be used in the wind tunnel simulation. To address this, the paper utilizes two nondimensional parameters, one representing the small-scale turbulence energy, ES, and the other the large-scale turbulence energy, EL, to elaborate the aerodynamic effects of turbulence intensity and integral length scales in the upstream wind. The results show that the maximum allowable mismatch ratio of integral length scales and of Jensen numbers between model and full-scale simulations depend on the target small-scale turbulence energy and the maximum allowable deviation of small-scale energy. By quantifying the effects of ES and EL on area-averaged pressure coefficients, the allowable limits are identified for wind tunnel test parameters that lead to negligible differences in the resultant pressure coefficient statistics in regions of separated-reattaching flow on the roof of a low-rise building.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the journal is to provide a means for the publication and interchange of information, on an international basis, on all those aspects of wind engineering that are included in the activities of the International Association for Wind Engineering http://www.iawe.org/. These are: social and economic impact of wind effects; wind characteristics and structure, local wind environments, wind loads and structural response, diffusion, pollutant dispersion and matter transport, wind effects on building heat loss and ventilation, wind effects on transport systems, aerodynamic aspects of wind energy generation, and codification of wind effects.
Papers on these subjects describing full-scale measurements, wind-tunnel simulation studies, computational or theoretical methods are published, as well as papers dealing with the development of techniques and apparatus for wind engineering experiments.