Laura Hancox , Monica Balasch , Jose Angulo , Emer Scott-Baird , Choew Kong Mah
{"title":"接种三种市售 PRRS 改良活病毒疫苗后,PRRSV-1 病毒血症和鼻腔脱落情况的比较","authors":"Laura Hancox , Monica Balasch , Jose Angulo , Emer Scott-Baird , Choew Kong Mah","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2024.105416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The effectiveness of three Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) Modified Live Virus (MLV) vaccines against PRRSV viraemia and nasal shedding following experimental challenge was compared. The study comprised a negative control (T01), and three treatment groups (T02, T03 and T04) each vaccinated with a single dose of a commercial PRRS MLV vaccine, given in accordance with the vaccine's Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC). Pigs aged 21 days were vaccinated (day 0), challenged intranasally (day 28) with heterologous PRRSV-1-1 strain Olot/91, then monitored for PRRSV viraemia and nasal shedding for 12 days. After challenge, pigs were viraemic on fewer days in group T04 (0.67) than groups T01 (0.91), T02 (0.81) and T03 (0.97) (<em>P</em> < 0.0296). From day 34, inclusive, serum PRRSV titres were lower in group T04 than negative controls (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.0001) and groups T02 and T03 (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.0047); serum PRRSV titre Area Under the Curve (AUC) for group T04 (42.34) was lower than in T01 (65.49), T02 (60.67) and T03 (67.38) (<em>P</em> < 0.0100); pigs exhibited nasal shedding on fewer days in group T04 (0.40) than T01 (0.78), T02 (0.64) and T03 (0.56) (<em>P</em> < 0.0101); and nasal shedding AUC for group T04 (8.52) was lower than in groups T01 (23.59, <em>P</em> < 0.0001) and T02 (19.37, <em>P</em> = 0.0001). The ability of PRRS MLV vaccines to reduce the duration of viraemia and nasal shedding after intranasal challenge with a heterologous PRRSV-1-1 strain differ significantly.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 105416"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528824002832/pdfft?md5=4487ef95589da9ebbef05ed76549eec9&pid=1-s2.0-S0034528824002832-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of viraemia and nasal shedding after PRRSV-1 challenge following vaccination with three commercially available PRRS modified live virus vaccines\",\"authors\":\"Laura Hancox , Monica Balasch , Jose Angulo , Emer Scott-Baird , Choew Kong Mah\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rvsc.2024.105416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The effectiveness of three Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) Modified Live Virus (MLV) vaccines against PRRSV viraemia and nasal shedding following experimental challenge was compared. The study comprised a negative control (T01), and three treatment groups (T02, T03 and T04) each vaccinated with a single dose of a commercial PRRS MLV vaccine, given in accordance with the vaccine's Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC). Pigs aged 21 days were vaccinated (day 0), challenged intranasally (day 28) with heterologous PRRSV-1-1 strain Olot/91, then monitored for PRRSV viraemia and nasal shedding for 12 days. After challenge, pigs were viraemic on fewer days in group T04 (0.67) than groups T01 (0.91), T02 (0.81) and T03 (0.97) (<em>P</em> < 0.0296). From day 34, inclusive, serum PRRSV titres were lower in group T04 than negative controls (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.0001) and groups T02 and T03 (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.0047); serum PRRSV titre Area Under the Curve (AUC) for group T04 (42.34) was lower than in T01 (65.49), T02 (60.67) and T03 (67.38) (<em>P</em> < 0.0100); pigs exhibited nasal shedding on fewer days in group T04 (0.40) than T01 (0.78), T02 (0.64) and T03 (0.56) (<em>P</em> < 0.0101); and nasal shedding AUC for group T04 (8.52) was lower than in groups T01 (23.59, <em>P</em> < 0.0001) and T02 (19.37, <em>P</em> = 0.0001). The ability of PRRS MLV vaccines to reduce the duration of viraemia and nasal shedding after intranasal challenge with a heterologous PRRSV-1-1 strain differ significantly.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in veterinary science\",\"volume\":\"180 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105416\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528824002832/pdfft?md5=4487ef95589da9ebbef05ed76549eec9&pid=1-s2.0-S0034528824002832-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in veterinary science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528824002832\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528824002832","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of viraemia and nasal shedding after PRRSV-1 challenge following vaccination with three commercially available PRRS modified live virus vaccines
The effectiveness of three Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) Modified Live Virus (MLV) vaccines against PRRSV viraemia and nasal shedding following experimental challenge was compared. The study comprised a negative control (T01), and three treatment groups (T02, T03 and T04) each vaccinated with a single dose of a commercial PRRS MLV vaccine, given in accordance with the vaccine's Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC). Pigs aged 21 days were vaccinated (day 0), challenged intranasally (day 28) with heterologous PRRSV-1-1 strain Olot/91, then monitored for PRRSV viraemia and nasal shedding for 12 days. After challenge, pigs were viraemic on fewer days in group T04 (0.67) than groups T01 (0.91), T02 (0.81) and T03 (0.97) (P < 0.0296). From day 34, inclusive, serum PRRSV titres were lower in group T04 than negative controls (P ≤ 0.0001) and groups T02 and T03 (P ≤ 0.0047); serum PRRSV titre Area Under the Curve (AUC) for group T04 (42.34) was lower than in T01 (65.49), T02 (60.67) and T03 (67.38) (P < 0.0100); pigs exhibited nasal shedding on fewer days in group T04 (0.40) than T01 (0.78), T02 (0.64) and T03 (0.56) (P < 0.0101); and nasal shedding AUC for group T04 (8.52) was lower than in groups T01 (23.59, P < 0.0001) and T02 (19.37, P = 0.0001). The ability of PRRS MLV vaccines to reduce the duration of viraemia and nasal shedding after intranasal challenge with a heterologous PRRSV-1-1 strain differ significantly.
期刊介绍:
Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research.
The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally.
High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health.
Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.