院际重症监护转运后的结果

Q3 Nursing Air Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.005
Meghan E. Edmondson PhD, RN, CCRN , Andrew P. Reimer PhD, RN, CFRN
{"title":"院际重症监护转运后的结果","authors":"Meghan E. Edmondson PhD, RN, CCRN ,&nbsp;Andrew P. Reimer PhD, RN, CFRN","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Patients who undergo interhospital transfer, particularly for intensive care unit (ICU) care, experience greater length of stay and mortality. There is evidence that patients transferred for surgical ICU care experience higher mortality rates; however, differences in length of stay or mortality across other ICU types remain unclear. The goals of this work were to assess how length of stay and mortality differ by ICU subspecialties.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective analysis of an existing critical care transfer data repository. We used multiple and logistic regression to identify significant factors that contribute to differences in length of stay and mortality for surgical ICU patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were no differences in length of stay or mortality based on ICU subspecialty. For every 1-year increase in age, mortality odds increased by 8.6% (<em>P</em> = .002). Patients transferred from an ICU had a longer length of stay by 6.3 days (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). Non-Caucasian patients had a shorter length of stay by 3.4 days (<em>P</em> = .012).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Length of stay and mortality are not influenced by ICU subspecialty. Further research is needed to determine the mechanism by which sending unit type and race influence length of stay and identify other factors that predict mortality for SICU patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"43 5","pages":"Pages 406-411"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X24000907/pdfft?md5=4cf8da2cde50d4795db9cf9dc21269f3&pid=1-s2.0-S1067991X24000907-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes After Interhospital Critical Care Transfer\",\"authors\":\"Meghan E. Edmondson PhD, RN, CCRN ,&nbsp;Andrew P. Reimer PhD, RN, CFRN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Patients who undergo interhospital transfer, particularly for intensive care unit (ICU) care, experience greater length of stay and mortality. There is evidence that patients transferred for surgical ICU care experience higher mortality rates; however, differences in length of stay or mortality across other ICU types remain unclear. The goals of this work were to assess how length of stay and mortality differ by ICU subspecialties.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective analysis of an existing critical care transfer data repository. We used multiple and logistic regression to identify significant factors that contribute to differences in length of stay and mortality for surgical ICU patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were no differences in length of stay or mortality based on ICU subspecialty. For every 1-year increase in age, mortality odds increased by 8.6% (<em>P</em> = .002). Patients transferred from an ICU had a longer length of stay by 6.3 days (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). Non-Caucasian patients had a shorter length of stay by 3.4 days (<em>P</em> = .012).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Length of stay and mortality are not influenced by ICU subspecialty. Further research is needed to determine the mechanism by which sending unit type and race influence length of stay and identify other factors that predict mortality for SICU patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Air Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"43 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 406-411\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X24000907/pdfft?md5=4cf8da2cde50d4795db9cf9dc21269f3&pid=1-s2.0-S1067991X24000907-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Air Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X24000907\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X24000907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的接受院间转院的患者,尤其是接受重症监护病房(ICU)护理的患者,住院时间和死亡率都会延长。有证据表明,转院接受外科重症监护室治疗的患者死亡率较高;但其他重症监护室类型的住院时间或死亡率的差异仍不清楚。我们对现有的重症监护转院数据存储库进行了回顾性分析。我们使用多元回归和逻辑回归来确定导致外科 ICU 患者住院时间和死亡率差异的重要因素。年龄每增加 1 岁,死亡率就会增加 8.6% (P = .002)。从重症监护室转来的患者住院时间延长了 6.3 天(P = .001)。结论:住院时间和死亡率不受 ICU 亚专科的影响。还需要进一步研究,以确定重症监护病房类型和种族对住院时间的影响机制,并找出预测重症监护病房患者死亡率的其他因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes After Interhospital Critical Care Transfer

Objective

Patients who undergo interhospital transfer, particularly for intensive care unit (ICU) care, experience greater length of stay and mortality. There is evidence that patients transferred for surgical ICU care experience higher mortality rates; however, differences in length of stay or mortality across other ICU types remain unclear. The goals of this work were to assess how length of stay and mortality differ by ICU subspecialties.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of an existing critical care transfer data repository. We used multiple and logistic regression to identify significant factors that contribute to differences in length of stay and mortality for surgical ICU patients.

Results

There were no differences in length of stay or mortality based on ICU subspecialty. For every 1-year increase in age, mortality odds increased by 8.6% (P = .002). Patients transferred from an ICU had a longer length of stay by 6.3 days (P < .001). Non-Caucasian patients had a shorter length of stay by 3.4 days (P = .012).

Conclusion

Length of stay and mortality are not influenced by ICU subspecialty. Further research is needed to determine the mechanism by which sending unit type and race influence length of stay and identify other factors that predict mortality for SICU patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Air Medical Journal
Air Medical Journal Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Air Medical Journal is the official journal of the five leading air medical transport associations in the United States. AMJ is the premier provider of information for the medical transport industry, addressing the unique concerns of medical transport physicians, nurses, pilots, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, communication specialists, and program administrators. The journal contains practical how-to articles, debates on controversial industry issues, legislative updates, case studies, and peer-reviewed original research articles covering all aspects of the medical transport profession.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board Psychomotor Vigilance Testing on Neonatal Transport: A Western Australian Experience Pericardiocentesis During Transport for Cardiac Tamponade Complicating Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Recent Outcomes Research in Helicopter Emergency Medical Services: A Scoping Review of Publication Year 2023 Additions to the Helicopter Outcomes Assessment Research Database
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1