2019-2020 年美国流感季节期间,佐剂与非佐剂流感疫苗对有流感并发症风险因素的老年人的相对有效性

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Vaccine Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126316
{"title":"2019-2020 年美国流感季节期间,佐剂与非佐剂流感疫苗对有流感并发症风险因素的老年人的相对有效性","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study estimated the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of the MF59®-adjuvanted trivalent influenza vaccine (aTIV) versus standard-dose nonadjuvanted egg-based quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIVe) for the prevention of influenza-related medical encounters (IRMEs), outpatient IRMEs, and influenza- and pneumonia-related hospitalizations during the 2019–2020 US influenza season among adults ≥65 years of age who had ≥1 high-risk condition. A secondary objective evaluated the rVE of aTIV versus QIVe in preventing these outcomes among older adults with specific high-risk conditions. This retrospective cohort study included US adults ≥65 years of age vaccinated with aTIV or QIVe between August 1, 2019, and January 31, 2020. Exposures, covariates, risk factors, and outcomes were captured from a linked dataset comprised of electronic health records (EHR) (Veradigm Network EHR) linked to insurance claims (Komodo Healthcare Map). A doubly robust approach was applied wherein multivariable-adjusted odds ratios were derived using inverse probability of treatment-weighted samples to calculate rVEs and 95 % confidence interval independently for individuals ≥1 high-risk condition and those with specific high-risk conditions. The study included 954,707 aTIV and 719,125 QIVe recipients. For all outcomes, aTIV was more effective than QIVe among adults ≥65 years of age who had ≥1 high-risk condition (any IMRE: 23.6 % [20.9 %–26.1 %]), outpatient IRME: 23.3 % [20.4 %–26.1 %], and influenza- or pneumonia-related hospitalizations: 19.0 % [16.3 %–21.6 %]), during the 2019–2020 influenza season. Similarly, aTIV was more effective than QIVe at preventing outcomes among individuals with specific high-risk conditions except for body mass index ≥40. This study demonstrated higher effectiveness of aTIV versus QIVe in preventing any IRMEs, outpatient IRMEs, and influenza- or pneumonia-related hospitalizations among adults ≥65 years of age who had ≥1 high-risk condition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24009988/pdfft?md5=2d165c033e767cf5f1c2827dfed52da4&pid=1-s2.0-S0264410X24009988-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative effectiveness of adjuvanted versus non-adjuvanted influenza vaccines in older adults with risk factors for influenza complications during the 2019–2020 U.S. influenza season\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study estimated the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of the MF59®-adjuvanted trivalent influenza vaccine (aTIV) versus standard-dose nonadjuvanted egg-based quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIVe) for the prevention of influenza-related medical encounters (IRMEs), outpatient IRMEs, and influenza- and pneumonia-related hospitalizations during the 2019–2020 US influenza season among adults ≥65 years of age who had ≥1 high-risk condition. A secondary objective evaluated the rVE of aTIV versus QIVe in preventing these outcomes among older adults with specific high-risk conditions. This retrospective cohort study included US adults ≥65 years of age vaccinated with aTIV or QIVe between August 1, 2019, and January 31, 2020. Exposures, covariates, risk factors, and outcomes were captured from a linked dataset comprised of electronic health records (EHR) (Veradigm Network EHR) linked to insurance claims (Komodo Healthcare Map). A doubly robust approach was applied wherein multivariable-adjusted odds ratios were derived using inverse probability of treatment-weighted samples to calculate rVEs and 95 % confidence interval independently for individuals ≥1 high-risk condition and those with specific high-risk conditions. The study included 954,707 aTIV and 719,125 QIVe recipients. For all outcomes, aTIV was more effective than QIVe among adults ≥65 years of age who had ≥1 high-risk condition (any IMRE: 23.6 % [20.9 %–26.1 %]), outpatient IRME: 23.3 % [20.4 %–26.1 %], and influenza- or pneumonia-related hospitalizations: 19.0 % [16.3 %–21.6 %]), during the 2019–2020 influenza season. Similarly, aTIV was more effective than QIVe at preventing outcomes among individuals with specific high-risk conditions except for body mass index ≥40. This study demonstrated higher effectiveness of aTIV versus QIVe in preventing any IRMEs, outpatient IRMEs, and influenza- or pneumonia-related hospitalizations among adults ≥65 years of age who had ≥1 high-risk condition.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vaccine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24009988/pdfft?md5=2d165c033e767cf5f1c2827dfed52da4&pid=1-s2.0-S0264410X24009988-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vaccine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24009988\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24009988","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究估算了 MF59® 佐剂三价流感疫苗 (aTIV) 与标准剂量无佐剂蛋基四价流感疫苗 (QIVe) 的相对疫苗效力 (rVE),用于在 2019-2020 年美国流感季节期间预防年龄≥65 岁、患有≥1 种高风险疾病的成年人发生流感相关医疗事件 (IRME)、门诊 IRME 以及流感和肺炎相关住院。次要目标是评估 aTIV 与 QIVe 在预防患有特定高危疾病的老年人中出现这些结果方面的 RVE。这项回顾性队列研究纳入了在 2019 年 8 月 1 日至 2020 年 1 月 31 日期间接种 aTIV 或 QIVe 的年龄≥65 岁的美国成年人。暴露、协变量、风险因素和结果均来自一个链接数据集,该数据集由电子健康记录(EHR)(Veradigm Network EHR)与保险索赔(Komodo Healthcare Map)链接而成。该研究采用了一种双重稳健的方法,即使用治疗加权样本的反概率得出多变量调整后的几率比,从而独立计算出≥1 种高风险状况的个体和具有特定高风险状况的个体的 rVEs 和 95 % 置信区间。这项研究包括 954 707 名 aTIV 和 719 125 名 QIVe 接受者。就所有结果而言,在年龄≥65 岁、患有≥1 种高风险疾病的成年人中,aTIV 比 QIVe 更有效(任何 IMRE:23.6 % [20.9 %-26.1%]),门诊 IRME:23.3 % [20.4 %-26.1%],流感或肺炎相关住院:19.0 % [16.3 %]:在 2019-2020 年流感季节期间,aTIV 的死亡率为 19.0%[16.3%-21.6%]。同样,对于除体重指数≥40以外的特定高危人群,aTIV比QIVe更能有效预防结果。这项研究表明,对于年龄≥65岁、患有≥1种高风险疾病的成年人,aTIV比QIVe更能有效预防任何IRMEs、门诊IRMEs以及与流感或肺炎相关的住院治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relative effectiveness of adjuvanted versus non-adjuvanted influenza vaccines in older adults with risk factors for influenza complications during the 2019–2020 U.S. influenza season

This study estimated the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of the MF59®-adjuvanted trivalent influenza vaccine (aTIV) versus standard-dose nonadjuvanted egg-based quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIVe) for the prevention of influenza-related medical encounters (IRMEs), outpatient IRMEs, and influenza- and pneumonia-related hospitalizations during the 2019–2020 US influenza season among adults ≥65 years of age who had ≥1 high-risk condition. A secondary objective evaluated the rVE of aTIV versus QIVe in preventing these outcomes among older adults with specific high-risk conditions. This retrospective cohort study included US adults ≥65 years of age vaccinated with aTIV or QIVe between August 1, 2019, and January 31, 2020. Exposures, covariates, risk factors, and outcomes were captured from a linked dataset comprised of electronic health records (EHR) (Veradigm Network EHR) linked to insurance claims (Komodo Healthcare Map). A doubly robust approach was applied wherein multivariable-adjusted odds ratios were derived using inverse probability of treatment-weighted samples to calculate rVEs and 95 % confidence interval independently for individuals ≥1 high-risk condition and those with specific high-risk conditions. The study included 954,707 aTIV and 719,125 QIVe recipients. For all outcomes, aTIV was more effective than QIVe among adults ≥65 years of age who had ≥1 high-risk condition (any IMRE: 23.6 % [20.9 %–26.1 %]), outpatient IRME: 23.3 % [20.4 %–26.1 %], and influenza- or pneumonia-related hospitalizations: 19.0 % [16.3 %–21.6 %]), during the 2019–2020 influenza season. Similarly, aTIV was more effective than QIVe at preventing outcomes among individuals with specific high-risk conditions except for body mass index ≥40. This study demonstrated higher effectiveness of aTIV versus QIVe in preventing any IRMEs, outpatient IRMEs, and influenza- or pneumonia-related hospitalizations among adults ≥65 years of age who had ≥1 high-risk condition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
期刊最新文献
Effect of COVID-19 vaccination on the risk of developing post-COVID conditions: The VENUS study Unraveling COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Europeans 50 and older through a lens of preventive practices Corrigendum to “Evaluation of commercial quadrivalent foot-and-mouth disease vaccines against east African virus strains reveals limited immunogenicity and duration of protection” [Vaccine 42 (1–12) (2024) 126325] Cost effectiveness analysis of rotavirus vaccination in Indonesia Parental decisions regarding the vaccination of children and adolescents against SARS-CoV-2 from 2020 to 2023: A descriptive longitudinal study of parents and children in Montreal, Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1