北美过敏症执业医师评估支气管扩张剂反应性测试中的无菌技术

Kabir Chhabra MD , Dhruva Gupta BS , Neel Singh , Naba Sharif MD , Sudhir Sekhsaria MD
{"title":"北美过敏症执业医师评估支气管扩张剂反应性测试中的无菌技术","authors":"Kabir Chhabra MD ,&nbsp;Dhruva Gupta BS ,&nbsp;Neel Singh ,&nbsp;Naba Sharif MD ,&nbsp;Sudhir Sekhsaria MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The American Thoracic Society has published general guidelines for sterility when testing for bronchodilator responsiveness. However, the extent to which practicing allergists implement sterility measures is currently unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aims to understand the adherence to the American Thoracic Society guidelines for sterility among practicing allergists.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In 2015, a questionnaire was approved and distributed by the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma &amp; Immunology to all its members. The anonymous responses were recorded and tabulated after a 3-week period.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 6800 allergists who received surveys from the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma &amp; Immunology members, 496 participated in the survey (response rate 7.3%). Using metered dose inhalers with a spacer and nebulizers were the most common bronchodilator administration techniques, as indicated by 59.35% and 58.52% of responses, respectively. Whereas 69.25% of the allergists considered their bronchodilator administration techniques to be sterile, 14.05% did not consider their administration technique to be sterile and 16.70% were unsure. For maintaining sterility, 38.75% of the respondents indicated using a new disposable attachment for reused inhalers, 18.71% indicated using a new inhaler for each patient, and 9.13% reported wiping inhalers with a cleaning agent.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>When asked about the sterility of the techniques used by them, nearly one-third of the allergists either stated that the measures used by them were unsterile or stated that they were were unsure. To increase adherence to sterility measures among North American allergists, promoting guideline awareness and proposing updated guidelines focused on the most common bronchodilator administration techniques is essential.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75041,"journal":{"name":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","volume":"3 4","pages":"Article 100325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772829324001218/pdfft?md5=ce28dc83b22cc5f27087df6f09c55fc8&pid=1-s2.0-S2772829324001218-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing sterility techniques in bronchodilator responsiveness testing by practicing allergists in North America\",\"authors\":\"Kabir Chhabra MD ,&nbsp;Dhruva Gupta BS ,&nbsp;Neel Singh ,&nbsp;Naba Sharif MD ,&nbsp;Sudhir Sekhsaria MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The American Thoracic Society has published general guidelines for sterility when testing for bronchodilator responsiveness. However, the extent to which practicing allergists implement sterility measures is currently unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aims to understand the adherence to the American Thoracic Society guidelines for sterility among practicing allergists.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In 2015, a questionnaire was approved and distributed by the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma &amp; Immunology to all its members. The anonymous responses were recorded and tabulated after a 3-week period.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 6800 allergists who received surveys from the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma &amp; Immunology members, 496 participated in the survey (response rate 7.3%). Using metered dose inhalers with a spacer and nebulizers were the most common bronchodilator administration techniques, as indicated by 59.35% and 58.52% of responses, respectively. Whereas 69.25% of the allergists considered their bronchodilator administration techniques to be sterile, 14.05% did not consider their administration technique to be sterile and 16.70% were unsure. For maintaining sterility, 38.75% of the respondents indicated using a new disposable attachment for reused inhalers, 18.71% indicated using a new inhaler for each patient, and 9.13% reported wiping inhalers with a cleaning agent.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>When asked about the sterility of the techniques used by them, nearly one-third of the allergists either stated that the measures used by them were unsterile or stated that they were were unsure. To increase adherence to sterility measures among North American allergists, promoting guideline awareness and proposing updated guidelines focused on the most common bronchodilator administration techniques is essential.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772829324001218/pdfft?md5=ce28dc83b22cc5f27087df6f09c55fc8&pid=1-s2.0-S2772829324001218-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772829324001218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772829324001218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景美国胸科学会发布了支气管扩张剂反应性测试无菌性一般指南。方法 2015 年,美国过敏、哮喘及免疫学学会批准并向其所有会员分发了一份调查问卷。结果在6800名收到美国过敏、哮喘及免疫学学会会员调查问卷的过敏学家中,有496人参与了调查(回复率为7.3%)。59.35%和58.52%的受访者表示,最常用的支气管扩张剂给药方法是使用带间隔器的定量吸入器和雾化器。69.25%的过敏症医生认为他们的支气管扩张剂给药技术是无菌的,14.05%的过敏症医生认为他们的给药技术不是无菌的,16.70%的过敏症医生不确定。在保持无菌方面,38.75% 的受访者表示对重复使用的吸入器使用新的一次性附件,18.71% 的受访者表示对每位患者使用新的吸入器,9.13% 的受访者表示使用清洁剂擦拭吸入器。为了提高北美过敏症医生对无菌措施的遵守程度,必须提高对指南的认识,并针对最常见的支气管扩张剂给药技术提出最新指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing sterility techniques in bronchodilator responsiveness testing by practicing allergists in North America

Background

The American Thoracic Society has published general guidelines for sterility when testing for bronchodilator responsiveness. However, the extent to which practicing allergists implement sterility measures is currently unknown.

Objective

This study aims to understand the adherence to the American Thoracic Society guidelines for sterility among practicing allergists.

Methods

In 2015, a questionnaire was approved and distributed by the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology to all its members. The anonymous responses were recorded and tabulated after a 3-week period.

Results

Of the 6800 allergists who received surveys from the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology members, 496 participated in the survey (response rate 7.3%). Using metered dose inhalers with a spacer and nebulizers were the most common bronchodilator administration techniques, as indicated by 59.35% and 58.52% of responses, respectively. Whereas 69.25% of the allergists considered their bronchodilator administration techniques to be sterile, 14.05% did not consider their administration technique to be sterile and 16.70% were unsure. For maintaining sterility, 38.75% of the respondents indicated using a new disposable attachment for reused inhalers, 18.71% indicated using a new inhaler for each patient, and 9.13% reported wiping inhalers with a cleaning agent.

Conclusions

When asked about the sterility of the techniques used by them, nearly one-third of the allergists either stated that the measures used by them were unsterile or stated that they were were unsure. To increase adherence to sterility measures among North American allergists, promoting guideline awareness and proposing updated guidelines focused on the most common bronchodilator administration techniques is essential.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global Immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
92 days
期刊最新文献
Reply Editorial board A different lens to explore health literacy skills in atopic conditions Anti–IL-4Ra therapy is superior to other biologic classes in treating allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis Investigating health care pathways for anaphylaxis: Seeing the bigger picture through linked data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1